The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Farrell, Shawn, Shandra, Emma, Viswanathan, Anand, Schwamm, Lee H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109
Resumo: Background and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.)
id UFSP_fde46b69ffd7b7257dadf6cc8afc3ef9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/35109
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine ProgramstelemedicinetelestrokeinventorybarriersBackground and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.)Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, São Paulo, BrazilAlbert Einstein Hosp, Neurol Program, São Paulo, BrazilChildrens Hosp, Ctr Innovat, Boston, MA 02115 USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02114 USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02114 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceHealth Resource Services Administration RequisitionHealth Resource Services Administration Requisition: 09-HRS9923-ABLippincott Williams & WilkinsUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Albert Einstein HospChildrens HospMassachusetts Gen HospSilva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]Farrell, ShawnShandra, EmmaViswanathan, AnandSchwamm, Lee H.2016-01-24T14:27:29Z2016-01-24T14:27:29Z2012-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion2078-U138http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012.10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.6458610039-2499http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109WOS:000306689300021engStrokeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2022-07-08T10:33:25Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/35109Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652022-07-08T10:33:25Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
spellingShingle The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
telemedicine
telestroke
inventory
barriers
title_short The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title_full The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title_fullStr The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title_full_unstemmed The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title_sort The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
author Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
author_facet Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
Farrell, Shawn
Shandra, Emma
Viswanathan, Anand
Schwamm, Lee H.
author_role author
author2 Farrell, Shawn
Shandra, Emma
Viswanathan, Anand
Schwamm, Lee H.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Albert Einstein Hosp
Childrens Hosp
Massachusetts Gen Hosp
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
Farrell, Shawn
Shandra, Emma
Viswanathan, Anand
Schwamm, Lee H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv telemedicine
telestroke
inventory
barriers
topic telemedicine
telestroke
inventory
barriers
description Background and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.)
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-08-01
2016-01-24T14:27:29Z
2016-01-24T14:27:29Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012.
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
0039-2499
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109
WOS:000306689300021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109
identifier_str_mv Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012.
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
0039-2499
WOS:000306689300021
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Stroke
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2078-U138
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268294022037504