The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109 |
Resumo: | Background and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.) |
id |
UFSP_fde46b69ffd7b7257dadf6cc8afc3ef9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/35109 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine ProgramstelemedicinetelestrokeinventorybarriersBackground and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.)Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, São Paulo, BrazilAlbert Einstein Hosp, Neurol Program, São Paulo, BrazilChildrens Hosp, Ctr Innovat, Boston, MA 02115 USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02114 USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02114 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceHealth Resource Services Administration RequisitionHealth Resource Services Administration Requisition: 09-HRS9923-ABLippincott Williams & WilkinsUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Albert Einstein HospChildrens HospMassachusetts Gen HospSilva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]Farrell, ShawnShandra, EmmaViswanathan, AnandSchwamm, Lee H.2016-01-24T14:27:29Z2016-01-24T14:27:29Z2012-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion2078-U138http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012.10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.6458610039-2499http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109WOS:000306689300021engStrokeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2022-07-08T10:33:25Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/35109Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652022-07-08T10:33:25Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs |
title |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs |
spellingShingle |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP] telemedicine telestroke inventory barriers |
title_short |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs |
title_full |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs |
title_fullStr |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs |
title_sort |
The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs |
author |
Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP] Farrell, Shawn Shandra, Emma Viswanathan, Anand Schwamm, Lee H. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Farrell, Shawn Shandra, Emma Viswanathan, Anand Schwamm, Lee H. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Albert Einstein Hosp Childrens Hosp Massachusetts Gen Hosp |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP] Farrell, Shawn Shandra, Emma Viswanathan, Anand Schwamm, Lee H. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
telemedicine telestroke inventory barriers |
topic |
telemedicine telestroke inventory barriers |
description |
Background and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.) |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-08-01 2016-01-24T14:27:29Z 2016-01-24T14:27:29Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861 Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861 0039-2499 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109 WOS:000306689300021 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109 |
identifier_str_mv |
Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861 0039-2499 WOS:000306689300021 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Stroke |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
2078-U138 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268294022037504 |