Training for “area” of Rural Education

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faleiro, Wender
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Geize Kelle Nunes, Farias, Magno Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo
Texto Completo: https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/article/view/7058
Resumo: Abstract: The theoretical-reflective study presents considerations on training by area of knowledge in the light of Historical-Critical Pedagogy, dialoguing mainly with Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) and Caldart (2011), in order to question why the Degree in Rural Education aims at a training model different from the other degrees implemented in Brazil. Training by area of knowledge will only be constituted if it is within the perspective of interdisciplinarity, in which Field Educators seek to articulate scientific knowledge, overcome its fragmentation and, mainly, have as a reference and give centrality for understanding the reality of the Field and its transformation. It is understood that this type of training is a way to build and produce counter-hegemonic knowledge, as it places the education process in a dynamic and integrated movement between more than one discipline, considering that fragmentation leads to limitation and alienation to understand the realities. Thus, we see the need to move forward in discussions on the structuring aspects of LEdoCs, the purpose and intentionality of the course through the struggle for the education of peasant subjects.
id UFT-5_1c977de561fd02c7af0cef2bd45d637e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.uft.edu.br:article/7058
network_acronym_str UFT-5
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo
repository_id_str
spelling Training for “area” of Rural EducationTraining for “area” of Rural EducationFormación por “área” de profesores de la Educación del CampoTraining for “area” of Rural EducationFormação por “área” de professores da Educação do CampoAbstract: The theoretical-reflective study presents considerations on training by area of knowledge in the light of Historical-Critical Pedagogy, dialoguing mainly with Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) and Caldart (2011), in order to question why the Degree in Rural Education aims at a training model different from the other degrees implemented in Brazil. Training by area of knowledge will only be constituted if it is within the perspective of interdisciplinarity, in which Field Educators seek to articulate scientific knowledge, overcome its fragmentation and, mainly, have as a reference and give centrality for understanding the reality of the Field and its transformation. It is understood that this type of training is a way to build and produce counter-hegemonic knowledge, as it places the education process in a dynamic and integrated movement between more than one discipline, considering that fragmentation leads to limitation and alienation to understand the realities. Thus, we see the need to move forward in discussions on the structuring aspects of LEdoCs, the purpose and intentionality of the course through the struggle for the education of peasant subjects.Abstract: The theoretical-reflective study presents considerations on training by area of knowledge in the light of Historical-Critical Pedagogy, dialoguing mainly with Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) and Caldart (2011), in order to question why the Degree in Rural Education aims at a training model different from the other degrees implemented in Brazil. Training by area of knowledge will only be constituted if it is within the perspective of interdisciplinarity, in which Field Educators seek to articulate scientific knowledge, overcome its fragmentation and, mainly, have as a reference and give centrality for understanding the reality of the Field and its transformation. It is understood that this type of training is a way to build and produce counter-hegemonic knowledge, as it places the education process in a dynamic and integrated movement between more than one discipline, considering that fragmentation leads to limitation and alienation to understand the realities. Thus, we see the need to move forward in discussions on the structuring aspects of LEdoCs, the purpose and intentionality of the course through the struggle for the education of peasant subjects.Resumen: El estudio teórico-reflexivo presenta consideraciones sobre la capacitación por área de conocimiento a la luz de la pedagogía histórico-crítica, dialogando principalmente con Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) y Caldart (2011), para cuestionar por qué el Grado en Educación Rural apunta a un modelo de capacitación diferente de los otros títulos implementados en Brasil. La capacitación por área de conocimiento solo se constituirá si está dentro de la perspectiva de la interdisciplinariedad, en la cual los educadores de campo buscan articular el conocimiento científico, superar su fragmentación y, principalmente, tener como referencia y dar centralidad para comprender la realidad del campo y su transformación Se entiende que este tipo de capacitación es una forma de construir y producir conocimiento contrahegemónico, ya que ubica el proceso educativo en un movimiento dinámico e integrado entre más de una disciplina, considerando que la fragmentación conduce a la limitación. y alienación para comprender las realidades. Por lo tanto, vemos la necesidad de avanzar en las discusiones sobre los aspectos estructurantes de los LEdoC, el propósito y la intencionalidad del curso a través de la lucha por la educación de los sujetos campesinos.Abstract: The theoretical-reflective study presents considerations on training by area of knowledge in the light of Historical-Critical Pedagogy, dialoguing mainly with Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) and Caldart (2011), in order to question why the Degree in Rural Education aims at a training model different from the other degrees implemented in Brazil. Training by area of knowledge will only be constituted if it is within the perspective of interdisciplinarity, in which Field Educators seek to articulate scientific knowledge, overcome its fragmentation and, mainly, have as a reference and give centrality for understanding the reality of the Field and its transformation. It is understood that this type of training is a way to build and produce counter-hegemonic knowledge, as it places the education process in a dynamic and integrated movement between more than one discipline, considering that fragmentation leads to limitation and alienation to understand the realities. Thus, we see the need to move forward in discussions on the structuring aspects of LEdoCs, the purpose and intentionality of the course through the struggle for the education of peasant subjects.O estudo teórico-reflexivo apresenta ponderações sobre a formação por área de conhecimento sob à luz da Pedagogia Histórico-Crítica, dialogando principalmente com Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) e Caldart (2011), com a finalidade de questionar o porquê da Licenciatura em Educação do Campo almejar um modelo formativo diferente das demais licenciaturas implantadas no Brasil. A formação por área de conhecimento só será constituída se estiver dentro da perspectiva da interdisciplinaridade, na qual os Educadores do Campo buscam articular conhecimentos científicos, superar sua fragmentação e, principalmente, ter como referência e dar centralidade para a compreensão da realidade do Campo e sua transformação. Entende-se que esse tipo de formação é uma forma de construir e produzir conhecimento contra-hegemônico, na medida em que coloca o processo de educação em um movimento dinâmico e integrado entre mais de uma disciplina, tendo em vista que a fragmentação leva a limitação e alienação para se compreender as realidades. Dessa forma, vemos a necessidade de avançarmos em discussões sobre os aspectos estruturantes das LEdoCs, a finalidade e intencionalidade do curso mediante a luta pela educação dos sujeitos campesinos. Palavras-chave: Formação de Professores, Educação do Campo, Pedagogia Histórico-Crítica.   Training for “area” of Rural Education Abstract: The theoretical-reflective study presents considerations on training by area of knowledge in the light of Historical-Critical Pedagogy, dialoguing mainly with Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) and Caldart (2011), in order to question why the Degree in Rural Education aims at a training model different from the other degrees implemented in Brazil. Training by area of knowledge will only be constituted if it is within the perspective of interdisciplinarity, in which Field Educators seek to articulate scientific knowledge, overcome its fragmentation and, mainly, have as a reference and give centrality for understanding the reality of the Field and its transformation. It is understood that this type of training is a way to build and produce counter-hegemonic knowledge, as it places the education process in a dynamic and integrated movement between more than one discipline, considering that fragmentation leads to limitation and alienation to understand the realities. Thus, we see the need to move forward in discussions on the structuring aspects of LEdoCs, the purpose and intentionality of the course through the struggle for the education of peasant subjects. Keywords: Teacher Training, Rural Education, Historic Pedagogy.   Formación por “área” de profesores de la Educación del Campo Resumen: El estudio teórico-reflexivo presenta consideraciones sobre la capacitación por área de conocimiento a la luz de la pedagogía histórico-crítica, dialogando principalmente con Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) y Caldart (2011), para cuestionar por qué el Grado en Educación Rural apunta a un modelo de capacitación diferente de los otros títulos implementados en Brasil. La capacitación por área de conocimiento solo se constituirá si está dentro de la perspectiva de la interdisciplinariedad, en la cual los educadores de campo buscan articular el conocimiento científico, superar su fragmentación y, principalmente, tener como referencia y dar centralidad para comprender la realidad del campo y su transformación Se entiende que este tipo de capacitación es una forma de construir y producir conocimiento contrahegemónico, ya que ubica el proceso educativo en un movimiento dinámico e integrado entre más de una disciplina, considerando que la fragmentación conduce a la limitación. y alienación para comprender las realidades. Por lo tanto, vemos la necesidad de avanzar en las discusiones sobre los aspectos estructurantes de los LEdoC, el propósito y la intencionalidad del curso a través de la lucha por la educación de los sujetos campesinos. Palabras-clave: Formación de Profesores, Educación del Campo, Pedagogía Histórico-Crítica.Universidade Federal do Tocantins2020-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdftext/htmlhttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/article/view/705810.20873/uft.rbec.e7058Brazilian Journal of Rural Education; Bd. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058Brazilian Journal of Rural Education; Vol. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058Revista Brasileña de Educación Rural; Vol. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058Brazilian Journal of Rural Education; Vol. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo; v. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e70582525-4863reponame:Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campoinstname:Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)instacron:UFTporhttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/article/view/7058/17818https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/article/view/7058/17819Copyright (c) 2020 Wender Faleiro, Geize Kelle Nunes Ribeiro, Magno Nunes Fariasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaleiro, WenderRibeiro, Geize Kelle NunesFarias, Magno Nunes2020-11-25T21:17:43Zoai:ojs.revista.uft.edu.br:article/7058Revistahttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campoPUBhttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/oaigustavo.araujo@uft.edu.br||rbec@uft.edu.br||gustavo.araujo@uft.edu.br|| rbec@uft.edu.br2525-48632525-4863opendoar:2020-11-25T21:17:43Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo - Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Training for “area” of Rural Education
Training for “area” of Rural Education
Formación por “área” de profesores de la Educación del Campo
Training for “area” of Rural Education
Formação por “área” de professores da Educação do Campo
title Training for “area” of Rural Education
spellingShingle Training for “area” of Rural Education
Faleiro, Wender
title_short Training for “area” of Rural Education
title_full Training for “area” of Rural Education
title_fullStr Training for “area” of Rural Education
title_full_unstemmed Training for “area” of Rural Education
title_sort Training for “area” of Rural Education
author Faleiro, Wender
author_facet Faleiro, Wender
Ribeiro, Geize Kelle Nunes
Farias, Magno Nunes
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Geize Kelle Nunes
Farias, Magno Nunes
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faleiro, Wender
Ribeiro, Geize Kelle Nunes
Farias, Magno Nunes
description Abstract: The theoretical-reflective study presents considerations on training by area of knowledge in the light of Historical-Critical Pedagogy, dialoguing mainly with Saviani (1999, 2011, 2016), Santos (2013) and Caldart (2011), in order to question why the Degree in Rural Education aims at a training model different from the other degrees implemented in Brazil. Training by area of knowledge will only be constituted if it is within the perspective of interdisciplinarity, in which Field Educators seek to articulate scientific knowledge, overcome its fragmentation and, mainly, have as a reference and give centrality for understanding the reality of the Field and its transformation. It is understood that this type of training is a way to build and produce counter-hegemonic knowledge, as it places the education process in a dynamic and integrated movement between more than one discipline, considering that fragmentation leads to limitation and alienation to understand the realities. Thus, we see the need to move forward in discussions on the structuring aspects of LEdoCs, the purpose and intentionality of the course through the struggle for the education of peasant subjects.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/article/view/7058
10.20873/uft.rbec.e7058
url https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/article/view/7058
identifier_str_mv 10.20873/uft.rbec.e7058
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/article/view/7058/17818
https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/campo/article/view/7058/17819
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Wender Faleiro, Geize Kelle Nunes Ribeiro, Magno Nunes Farias
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Wender Faleiro, Geize Kelle Nunes Ribeiro, Magno Nunes Farias
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Tocantins
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Tocantins
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Rural Education; Bd. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058
Brazilian Journal of Rural Education; Vol. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058
Revista Brasileña de Educación Rural; Vol. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058
Brazilian Journal of Rural Education; Vol. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058
Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo; v. 5 (2020): Publicação Contínua / Continuous Publication; e7058
2525-4863
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo
instname:Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)
instacron:UFT
instname_str Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)
instacron_str UFT
institution UFT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo
collection Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo - Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gustavo.araujo@uft.edu.br||rbec@uft.edu.br||gustavo.araujo@uft.edu.br|| rbec@uft.edu.br
_version_ 1798319757703774208