Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Domínios de Lingu@gem |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/60936 |
Resumo: | In this paper we have reviewed the concepts of standard language and careful style in texts to discuss the relevance of a sociolinguistic notion of style for written texts. For this purpose, we have revised the sociolinguistic literature on style from Labov (1966); Bell (1984) and Eckert (2000; 2008); Moore (2004) and Mendoza-Denton (2001) and bringing the discussion guided by Coulmas (2014) about a supposed lack of interest in linguistic and sociolinguistic studies about taking written productions as an object of analysis. Then, based on the discussion by Faraco (2008) and Preti (1999) about written standards, we present linguistic analysis’ results from a corpus composed by 12 opinion texts, from a national newspaper, with the purpose to observe the behavior of the variables “recovery of textual antecedent by verbal complement” and “construction of relative clauses”. Finally, as a contribution to theoretical discussion, articulated to the results’ discussion, we argue about the need of reconsidering the careful style’s concept as a guiding criterion for the written standards, proposing an approach to privilege the notion of stylistic agency and, lastly, speculating what in this discussion may interest linguistic education and the pedagogy of linguistic variation. |
id |
UFU-12_8170efacfcc1cbef4f8c124b0449f5de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/60936 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-12 |
network_name_str |
Domínios de Lingu@gem |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisitedSubsídios para uma noção sociolinguística de estilo para textos escritos: norma culta e estilo monitorado revisitadosEstiloTexto EscritoNorma CultaVariaçãoEducação LinguísticaStyleWritten textStandard languageVariationLinguistic EducationIn this paper we have reviewed the concepts of standard language and careful style in texts to discuss the relevance of a sociolinguistic notion of style for written texts. For this purpose, we have revised the sociolinguistic literature on style from Labov (1966); Bell (1984) and Eckert (2000; 2008); Moore (2004) and Mendoza-Denton (2001) and bringing the discussion guided by Coulmas (2014) about a supposed lack of interest in linguistic and sociolinguistic studies about taking written productions as an object of analysis. Then, based on the discussion by Faraco (2008) and Preti (1999) about written standards, we present linguistic analysis’ results from a corpus composed by 12 opinion texts, from a national newspaper, with the purpose to observe the behavior of the variables “recovery of textual antecedent by verbal complement” and “construction of relative clauses”. Finally, as a contribution to theoretical discussion, articulated to the results’ discussion, we argue about the need of reconsidering the careful style’s concept as a guiding criterion for the written standards, proposing an approach to privilege the notion of stylistic agency and, lastly, speculating what in this discussion may interest linguistic education and the pedagogy of linguistic variation.Revisitamos os conceitos de norma culta e de estilo monitorado em textos escritos para discutir a pertinência de uma noção sociolinguística de estilo para textos escritos. Para tanto, revisamos a literatura sociolinguística sobre estilo a partir de Labov (1966); Bell (1984) e Eckert (2000; 2008); Moore (2004) e Mendoza-Denton (2001) e apresentamos a discussão motivada por Coulmas (2014) sobre um suposto desinteresse dos estudos linguísticos e sociolinguísticos em tomar as produções escritas como objeto de análise. Em seguida, tendo em vista a discussão de Faraco (2008) e Preti (1999) sobre norma culta escrita, apresentamos resultados de análise linguística de um corpus composto por 12 textos de opinião, de jornal de circulação nacional, com vistas a observar o comportamento das variáveis ‘recuperação de antecedente textual por complemento verbal’ e ‘construção de orações relativas’. Por fim, como contribuição à discussão teórica, articulada à discussão dos resultados, argumentamos sobre a necessidade da revisão do conceito de monitoração estilística como critério balizador da norma culta escrita, propondo um enfoque que privilegie a noção de agência estilística e, finalmente, especulando sobre o que (dessa discussão) pode interessar à educação linguística e à pedagogia da variação linguística.PP/UFU2021-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/6093610.14393/DL50-v16n2a2022-11Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2022): Estudos sobre a relação entre gramática e língua: diversidade, unidade e métodos; 691-720Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2022): Estudos sobre a relação entre gramática e língua: diversidade, unidade e métodos; 691-720Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 16 n. 2 (2022): Estudos sobre a relação entre gramática e língua: diversidade, unidade e métodos; 691-7201980-5799reponame:Domínios de Lingu@geminstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/60936/32225https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/60936/35165Copyright (c) 2022 Adriano de Souza, Viviane de Vargas Geribonehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Adriano deGeribone, Viviane de Vargas2022-12-02T19:52:54Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/60936Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagemPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/oairevistadominios@ileel.ufu.br||1980-57991980-5799opendoar:2022-12-02T19:52:54Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited Subsídios para uma noção sociolinguística de estilo para textos escritos: norma culta e estilo monitorado revisitados |
title |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited |
spellingShingle |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited Souza, Adriano de Estilo Texto Escrito Norma Culta Variação Educação Linguística Style Written text Standard language Variation Linguistic Education |
title_short |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited |
title_full |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited |
title_fullStr |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited |
title_full_unstemmed |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited |
title_sort |
Subsidies for a sociolinguistic notion of style for written text: standard language and careful style revisited |
author |
Souza, Adriano de |
author_facet |
Souza, Adriano de Geribone, Viviane de Vargas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Geribone, Viviane de Vargas |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Adriano de Geribone, Viviane de Vargas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estilo Texto Escrito Norma Culta Variação Educação Linguística Style Written text Standard language Variation Linguistic Education |
topic |
Estilo Texto Escrito Norma Culta Variação Educação Linguística Style Written text Standard language Variation Linguistic Education |
description |
In this paper we have reviewed the concepts of standard language and careful style in texts to discuss the relevance of a sociolinguistic notion of style for written texts. For this purpose, we have revised the sociolinguistic literature on style from Labov (1966); Bell (1984) and Eckert (2000; 2008); Moore (2004) and Mendoza-Denton (2001) and bringing the discussion guided by Coulmas (2014) about a supposed lack of interest in linguistic and sociolinguistic studies about taking written productions as an object of analysis. Then, based on the discussion by Faraco (2008) and Preti (1999) about written standards, we present linguistic analysis’ results from a corpus composed by 12 opinion texts, from a national newspaper, with the purpose to observe the behavior of the variables “recovery of textual antecedent by verbal complement” and “construction of relative clauses”. Finally, as a contribution to theoretical discussion, articulated to the results’ discussion, we argue about the need of reconsidering the careful style’s concept as a guiding criterion for the written standards, proposing an approach to privilege the notion of stylistic agency and, lastly, speculating what in this discussion may interest linguistic education and the pedagogy of linguistic variation. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/60936 10.14393/DL50-v16n2a2022-11 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/60936 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/DL50-v16n2a2022-11 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/60936/32225 https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/60936/35165 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Adriano de Souza, Viviane de Vargas Geribone http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Adriano de Souza, Viviane de Vargas Geribone http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PP/UFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PP/UFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2022): Estudos sobre a relação entre gramática e língua: diversidade, unidade e métodos; 691-720 Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2022): Estudos sobre a relação entre gramática e língua: diversidade, unidade e métodos; 691-720 Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 16 n. 2 (2022): Estudos sobre a relação entre gramática e língua: diversidade, unidade e métodos; 691-720 1980-5799 reponame:Domínios de Lingu@gem instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Domínios de Lingu@gem |
collection |
Domínios de Lingu@gem |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadominios@ileel.ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797067717631541248 |