Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, Adriana Feliciana
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Dantas, Verônica de Mendonça, Chavaglia, Suzel Regina Ribeiro, Barbosa, Maria Helena, Júnior, Marcos Antônio Ferreira, Barichello, Elizabeth
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42442
Resumo: construct and validate an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds. The content and apparent validities were appreciated by experts, the reliability by the analysis of concordance between evaluators using the interclass correlation coefficient and to verify the construct validity was used the instrument Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. the analysis of the scores of the instrument by the ICC showed an excellent and significant correlation (K = 0.914) and to verify the construct validity of the instrument, the Pearson correlation coefficient, whose result was 0.573, showed a statistically significant and strong correlation between the scores instrument and the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. Most of the concordances of the items were classified as moderate or substantial.  The instrument is valid and reliable. It is suggest longitudinal studies in larger populations, semantic validation in a sample of nurses, and an illustrative guide to standardize concepts in order to improve the evaluation of metric properties.
id UFU-14_017f0807d189c15e77e34682b1de4dd9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42442
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic woundsConstrução, validação e confiabilidade de um instrumento para avaliação e evolução de feridas crônicasNursingWound HealingNursing RecordsValidation StudiesHealth sciencesconstruct and validate an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds. The content and apparent validities were appreciated by experts, the reliability by the analysis of concordance between evaluators using the interclass correlation coefficient and to verify the construct validity was used the instrument Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. the analysis of the scores of the instrument by the ICC showed an excellent and significant correlation (K = 0.914) and to verify the construct validity of the instrument, the Pearson correlation coefficient, whose result was 0.573, showed a statistically significant and strong correlation between the scores instrument and the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. Most of the concordances of the items were classified as moderate or substantial.  The instrument is valid and reliable. It is suggest longitudinal studies in larger populations, semantic validation in a sample of nurses, and an illustrative guide to standardize concepts in order to improve the evaluation of metric properties.construir e validar um instrumento de avaliação e evolução de feridas crônicas. As validades de conteúdo e aparente foram apreciada por experts, a confiabilidade pela análise de concordância entre avaliadoras com uso do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse  e para verificar a validade de construto foi utilizado o instrumento Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. A análise dos escores do instrumento pelo ICC apresentou correlação excelente e significativa (K=0,914) e para verificar a validade de construto do instrumento, o coeficiente de correlação de Pearson, cujo resultado foi de 0,573, apresentou correlação estatisticamente significativa e forte entre os escores do instrumento e o Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. A maioria das concordâncias dos itens foi classificada como moderada ou substancial. O instrumento é válido e confiável. Sugere-se estudos longitudinais em populações maiores, validação semântica em uma amostra de enfermeiros e um guia ilustrativo para padronizar conceitos afim de melhorar a avaliação das propriedades métricas.EDUFU2019-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4244210.14393/BJ-v35n4a2019-42442Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): July/Aug.; 1290-1299Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 4 (2019): July/Aug.; 1290-12991981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42442/26674Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Adriana Feliciana Melo, Verônica de Mendonça Dantas, Suzel Regina Ribeiro Chavaglia, Maria Helena Barbosa, Marcos Antônio Ferreira Júnior, Elizabeth Barichellohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Adriana FelicianaDantas, Verônica de MendonçaChavaglia, Suzel Regina RibeiroBarbosa, Maria HelenaJúnior, Marcos Antônio FerreiraBarichello, Elizabeth2022-01-31T22:22:45Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42442Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-31T22:22:45Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds
Construção, validação e confiabilidade de um instrumento para avaliação e evolução de feridas crônicas
title Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds
spellingShingle Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds
Melo, Adriana Feliciana
Nursing
Wound Healing
Nursing Records
Validation Studies
Health sciences
title_short Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds
title_full Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds
title_fullStr Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds
title_full_unstemmed Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds
title_sort Construction, validation and reliability of an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds
author Melo, Adriana Feliciana
author_facet Melo, Adriana Feliciana
Dantas, Verônica de Mendonça
Chavaglia, Suzel Regina Ribeiro
Barbosa, Maria Helena
Júnior, Marcos Antônio Ferreira
Barichello, Elizabeth
author_role author
author2 Dantas, Verônica de Mendonça
Chavaglia, Suzel Regina Ribeiro
Barbosa, Maria Helena
Júnior, Marcos Antônio Ferreira
Barichello, Elizabeth
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, Adriana Feliciana
Dantas, Verônica de Mendonça
Chavaglia, Suzel Regina Ribeiro
Barbosa, Maria Helena
Júnior, Marcos Antônio Ferreira
Barichello, Elizabeth
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nursing
Wound Healing
Nursing Records
Validation Studies
Health sciences
topic Nursing
Wound Healing
Nursing Records
Validation Studies
Health sciences
description construct and validate an instrument for evaluation and evolution of chronic wounds. The content and apparent validities were appreciated by experts, the reliability by the analysis of concordance between evaluators using the interclass correlation coefficient and to verify the construct validity was used the instrument Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. the analysis of the scores of the instrument by the ICC showed an excellent and significant correlation (K = 0.914) and to verify the construct validity of the instrument, the Pearson correlation coefficient, whose result was 0.573, showed a statistically significant and strong correlation between the scores instrument and the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing. Most of the concordances of the items were classified as moderate or substantial.  The instrument is valid and reliable. It is suggest longitudinal studies in larger populations, semantic validation in a sample of nurses, and an illustrative guide to standardize concepts in order to improve the evaluation of metric properties.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42442
10.14393/BJ-v35n4a2019-42442
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42442
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v35n4a2019-42442
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42442/26674
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): July/Aug.; 1290-1299
Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 4 (2019): July/Aug.; 1290-1299
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069080455282688

Registros relacionados