Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Massafra , Bruna Carbonari
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Dandara Anderle, Doglas Cecchin, Bruno Carlini Júnior, Matheus Albino Souza, De Carli, João Paulo, Migueli Durigon, Ana Paula Farina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/50035
Resumo: This study objectives to evaluate the fracture strength of upper central incisors (UCI) restored with composite resin (CR) in Class III cavities and endodontically treated teeth with or without glass fiber post (GFP), analyzing their failure mode. Sixty human UCI were randomly divided into four experimental groups: endodontically treated teeth without GFP (G1), endodontically treated teeth with GFP (G2), teeth with mesial/distal Class III cavities restored with CR without GFP (G3), and teeth with mesial/distal Class III cavities restored with CR with GFP (G4). The samples were submitted to the fracture strength test in a universal testing machine with a compression shear load applied at speed of 1.0 mm/min until fracture occurred. The data were submitted to one-way ANOVA (α=0.05) and the samples were analyzed for failure mode. The analysis did not show a significant statistical difference in fracture strength between the groups (p>0.05). The results showed that only endodontically treated teeth (G1) (753.4N) presented behavior similar to teeth with GFP (G2) (702.1N). The same occurred when comparing teeth with Class III cavities without GFP (G3) (670.2 N) and with GFP (G4) (746.1N). It can be concluded that glass fiber posts do not change the fracture strength of incisors with endodontic treatment and Class III cavities.
id UFU-14_042d28456a151916eb454281cacbffa5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/50035
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teethInfluencia de pinos de fibra de vidro e restaurações diretas em classe III na resistência de dentes anterioresCavities.Composite resinsEndodontically treated teeth.Fracture.Health ScienceCavidade.Resinas compostas.Dentes tratados endodonticamente.Fratura.This study objectives to evaluate the fracture strength of upper central incisors (UCI) restored with composite resin (CR) in Class III cavities and endodontically treated teeth with or without glass fiber post (GFP), analyzing their failure mode. Sixty human UCI were randomly divided into four experimental groups: endodontically treated teeth without GFP (G1), endodontically treated teeth with GFP (G2), teeth with mesial/distal Class III cavities restored with CR without GFP (G3), and teeth with mesial/distal Class III cavities restored with CR with GFP (G4). The samples were submitted to the fracture strength test in a universal testing machine with a compression shear load applied at speed of 1.0 mm/min until fracture occurred. The data were submitted to one-way ANOVA (α=0.05) and the samples were analyzed for failure mode. The analysis did not show a significant statistical difference in fracture strength between the groups (p>0.05). The results showed that only endodontically treated teeth (G1) (753.4N) presented behavior similar to teeth with GFP (G2) (702.1N). The same occurred when comparing teeth with Class III cavities without GFP (G3) (670.2 N) and with GFP (G4) (746.1N). It can be concluded that glass fiber posts do not change the fracture strength of incisors with endodontic treatment and Class III cavities.Este estudo objetiva avaliar a resistência à fratura de incisivos centrais superiores (ICS) restaurados com resina composta (RC) em cavidades Classe III e dentes tratados endodonticamente com ou sem pino de fibra de vidro (PFV), analisando seu padrão de fratura. Sessenta ICS humanos foram divididos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos experimentais: dentes tratados endodonticamente sem PFV (G1), dentes tratados endodonticamente com PFV (G2), dentes com cavidades mesiais/distais Classe III restauradas com RC sem PFV (G3), e dentes com cavidades mesiais/distais Classe III restauradas com RC com PFV (G4). As amostras foram submetidas ao teste de resistência à fratura em uma máquina universal de ensaios com uma carga de cisalhamento de compressão aplicada na velocidade de 1,0 mm / min até a ocorrência da fratura. Os dados foram submetidos à ANOVA unidirecional (α=0,05) e as amostras foram analisadas quanto ao modo de falha. A análise não mostrou diferença estatisticamente significativa na resistência à fratura entre os grupos (p>0,05). Os resultados mostraram que os dentes apenas tratados endodonticamente (G1) (753,4N) apresentaram comportamento semelhante aos dentes com PFV (G2) (702,1N). O mesmo ocorreu ao comparar dentes com cavidades Classe III sem PFV (G3) (670.2 N) e com PFV (G4) (746.1N). Pode-se concluir que pinos de fibra de vidro não alteram a resistência à fratura de incisivos com tratamento endodôntico e cavidades Classe III.EDUFU2020-08-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/5003510.14393/BJ-v36n5a2020-50035Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 5 (2020): Sept./Oct.; 1785-1793Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 5 (2020): Sept./Oct.; 1785-17931981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/50035/29642Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2020 Bruna Carbonari Massafra , Dandara Anderle, Doglas Cecchin, Bruno Carlini Júnior, Matheus Albino Souza, João Paulo De Carli, Migueli Durigon, Ana Paula Farinahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMassafra , Bruna Carbonari Dandara AnderleDoglas CecchinBruno Carlini JúniorMatheus Albino SouzaDe Carli, João PauloMigueli DurigonAna Paula Farina2022-06-14T11:33:30Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/50035Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-06-14T11:33:30Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth
Influencia de pinos de fibra de vidro e restaurações diretas em classe III na resistência de dentes anteriores
title Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth
spellingShingle Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth
Massafra , Bruna Carbonari
Cavities.
Composite resins
Endodontically treated teeth.
Fracture.
Health Science
Cavidade.
Resinas compostas.
Dentes tratados endodonticamente.
Fratura.
title_short Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth
title_full Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth
title_fullStr Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth
title_full_unstemmed Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth
title_sort Influence of glass fiber posts and class III direct restorations on the resistance of anterior teeth
author Massafra , Bruna Carbonari
author_facet Massafra , Bruna Carbonari
Dandara Anderle
Doglas Cecchin
Bruno Carlini Júnior
Matheus Albino Souza
De Carli, João Paulo
Migueli Durigon
Ana Paula Farina
author_role author
author2 Dandara Anderle
Doglas Cecchin
Bruno Carlini Júnior
Matheus Albino Souza
De Carli, João Paulo
Migueli Durigon
Ana Paula Farina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Massafra , Bruna Carbonari
Dandara Anderle
Doglas Cecchin
Bruno Carlini Júnior
Matheus Albino Souza
De Carli, João Paulo
Migueli Durigon
Ana Paula Farina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cavities.
Composite resins
Endodontically treated teeth.
Fracture.
Health Science
Cavidade.
Resinas compostas.
Dentes tratados endodonticamente.
Fratura.
topic Cavities.
Composite resins
Endodontically treated teeth.
Fracture.
Health Science
Cavidade.
Resinas compostas.
Dentes tratados endodonticamente.
Fratura.
description This study objectives to evaluate the fracture strength of upper central incisors (UCI) restored with composite resin (CR) in Class III cavities and endodontically treated teeth with or without glass fiber post (GFP), analyzing their failure mode. Sixty human UCI were randomly divided into four experimental groups: endodontically treated teeth without GFP (G1), endodontically treated teeth with GFP (G2), teeth with mesial/distal Class III cavities restored with CR without GFP (G3), and teeth with mesial/distal Class III cavities restored with CR with GFP (G4). The samples were submitted to the fracture strength test in a universal testing machine with a compression shear load applied at speed of 1.0 mm/min until fracture occurred. The data were submitted to one-way ANOVA (α=0.05) and the samples were analyzed for failure mode. The analysis did not show a significant statistical difference in fracture strength between the groups (p>0.05). The results showed that only endodontically treated teeth (G1) (753.4N) presented behavior similar to teeth with GFP (G2) (702.1N). The same occurred when comparing teeth with Class III cavities without GFP (G3) (670.2 N) and with GFP (G4) (746.1N). It can be concluded that glass fiber posts do not change the fracture strength of incisors with endodontic treatment and Class III cavities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/50035
10.14393/BJ-v36n5a2020-50035
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/50035
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n5a2020-50035
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/50035/29642
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 5 (2020): Sept./Oct.; 1785-1793
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 5 (2020): Sept./Oct.; 1785-1793
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069082328039424