Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Torres, Francisco Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo, Benites, Simone Botelho, Oliveira, Elisa Pereira de, Corrêa, Caio Cezar Guedes, Silva, Flávia Alves da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29307
Resumo: The evaluation of the coefficient of repeatability (r) allows verify if the superiority or initial inferiority of an individual remains over the measurements, being important for genetic breading programs with forages. Thus, this research aimed to determine the minimum number of cuts for selection with greater efficiency and reliability and to phenotypic stabilization of P. maximum cultivars. The experiment was conducted during the months of September 2011 to October 2012 at the State University of Mato Grosso do Sul. It were used three P. maximum cultivars (Massai, Mombaça and Tanzânia) for evaluation of dry mass of leaves and stems and total dry mass in six cuts. From this cuts, it was estimated the coefficient of r repeatability by methods ANOVA, principal components (correlation and covariance matrices) and structural analysis, as well as the required number of cuts based on pre-established coefficients of determination (0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95 and 0.99). Seven harvests are necessary to discriminate with 85% accuracy in P. maximum cultivars based on the traits dry mass of leaves, dry mass of stems and total dry mass. The exclusion of the first three harvests promotes increase in coefficients of repeatability and determination due to forage production stabilization of P. maximum cultivars.
id UFU-14_26cfd40a37e0c8b885dc9e97fd9335a7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/29307
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum reliabilityexperimental precisionrepeatability.Agricultural SciencesThe evaluation of the coefficient of repeatability (r) allows verify if the superiority or initial inferiority of an individual remains over the measurements, being important for genetic breading programs with forages. Thus, this research aimed to determine the minimum number of cuts for selection with greater efficiency and reliability and to phenotypic stabilization of P. maximum cultivars. The experiment was conducted during the months of September 2011 to October 2012 at the State University of Mato Grosso do Sul. It were used three P. maximum cultivars (Massai, Mombaça and Tanzânia) for evaluation of dry mass of leaves and stems and total dry mass in six cuts. From this cuts, it was estimated the coefficient of r repeatability by methods ANOVA, principal components (correlation and covariance matrices) and structural analysis, as well as the required number of cuts based on pre-established coefficients of determination (0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95 and 0.99). Seven harvests are necessary to discriminate with 85% accuracy in P. maximum cultivars based on the traits dry mass of leaves, dry mass of stems and total dry mass. The exclusion of the first three harvests promotes increase in coefficients of repeatability and determination due to forage production stabilization of P. maximum cultivars.EDUFU2016-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/2930710.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-29307Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 172-178Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 172-1781981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29307/17764Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Francisco Eduardo Torres, Paulo Eduardo Teodoro, Simone Botelho Benites, Elisa Pereira de Oliveira, Caio Cezar Guedes Corrêa, Flávia Alves da Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTorres, Francisco EduardoTeodoro, Paulo EduardoBenites, Simone BotelhoOliveira, Elisa Pereira deCorrêa, Caio Cezar GuedesSilva, Flávia Alves da2022-02-23T12:06:27Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/29307Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-23T12:06:27Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum
title Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum
spellingShingle Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum
Torres, Francisco Eduardo
reliability
experimental precision
repeatability.
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum
title_full Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum
title_fullStr Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum
title_full_unstemmed Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum
title_sort Number of cuts for estimating forage productivity in P. maximum
author Torres, Francisco Eduardo
author_facet Torres, Francisco Eduardo
Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
Benites, Simone Botelho
Oliveira, Elisa Pereira de
Corrêa, Caio Cezar Guedes
Silva, Flávia Alves da
author_role author
author2 Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
Benites, Simone Botelho
Oliveira, Elisa Pereira de
Corrêa, Caio Cezar Guedes
Silva, Flávia Alves da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torres, Francisco Eduardo
Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
Benites, Simone Botelho
Oliveira, Elisa Pereira de
Corrêa, Caio Cezar Guedes
Silva, Flávia Alves da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv reliability
experimental precision
repeatability.
Agricultural Sciences
topic reliability
experimental precision
repeatability.
Agricultural Sciences
description The evaluation of the coefficient of repeatability (r) allows verify if the superiority or initial inferiority of an individual remains over the measurements, being important for genetic breading programs with forages. Thus, this research aimed to determine the minimum number of cuts for selection with greater efficiency and reliability and to phenotypic stabilization of P. maximum cultivars. The experiment was conducted during the months of September 2011 to October 2012 at the State University of Mato Grosso do Sul. It were used three P. maximum cultivars (Massai, Mombaça and Tanzânia) for evaluation of dry mass of leaves and stems and total dry mass in six cuts. From this cuts, it was estimated the coefficient of r repeatability by methods ANOVA, principal components (correlation and covariance matrices) and structural analysis, as well as the required number of cuts based on pre-established coefficients of determination (0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95 and 0.99). Seven harvests are necessary to discriminate with 85% accuracy in P. maximum cultivars based on the traits dry mass of leaves, dry mass of stems and total dry mass. The exclusion of the first three harvests promotes increase in coefficients of repeatability and determination due to forage production stabilization of P. maximum cultivars.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29307
10.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-29307
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29307
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v32n1a2016-29307
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/29307/17764
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 172-178
Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 1 (2016): Jan./Feb.; 172-178
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069075436797952