Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
| Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47948 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different commercial silanes on microshear bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty ceramic samples with 10 mm in length, 10 mm wide and 3 mm in thickness were fabricated, etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds, and divided into 5 groups, according to the commercial silane applied: G1- RelyX Ceramic Primer (3M ESPE), G2- Angelus Silane, G3- Prosil (FGM), G4- Dentsply Silane (Dentsply) and G5- Bis-Silane (Bisco). Silanes were applied in accordance to manufacturers’ recommendations. Addition silicone molds with 1 mm in thickness, 10 mm in diameter and 3 perforations with 1 mm in diameter each one, were placed on ceramic and filled with the resin cement Rely X ARC (3M ESPE) in all groups. Light activation was performed with LED Bluephase G2 (Ivoclar Vivadent) at 1200 mW/cm2, for 30 seconds. Samples were maintained in 100% humidity at 37°C for 24 hours and submitted to microshear test. The data (MPa) were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). The results obtained for each group were: G1: 22.39±2.99; G2: 23.35±4.08; G3: 26.05±5.46; G4: 18.56±4.09; G5: 25.26±4.10. Statistical analysis showed significantly lower microshear bond strength for G4. Fracture pattern analysis showed predominance of adhesive failures in G1 and G2. G3 and G5 presented higher percentage of cohesive failures in ceramic, and G4 showed mixed, adhesive and cohesive fractures with similar percentages. It was concluded that different silanes showed influence on the lithium disilicate ceramic – resin cement bond strength. |
| id |
UFU-14_2b52db33f3e6a2f66fb6edbbabed75b8 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/47948 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
| network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramicEfeito de silanos comerciais na resistência de união do cimento resinoso à cerâmica de dissilicato de lítioSilanesCeramicsCementationShear strength. Health Sciences The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different commercial silanes on microshear bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty ceramic samples with 10 mm in length, 10 mm wide and 3 mm in thickness were fabricated, etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds, and divided into 5 groups, according to the commercial silane applied: G1- RelyX Ceramic Primer (3M ESPE), G2- Angelus Silane, G3- Prosil (FGM), G4- Dentsply Silane (Dentsply) and G5- Bis-Silane (Bisco). Silanes were applied in accordance to manufacturers’ recommendations. Addition silicone molds with 1 mm in thickness, 10 mm in diameter and 3 perforations with 1 mm in diameter each one, were placed on ceramic and filled with the resin cement Rely X ARC (3M ESPE) in all groups. Light activation was performed with LED Bluephase G2 (Ivoclar Vivadent) at 1200 mW/cm2, for 30 seconds. Samples were maintained in 100% humidity at 37°C for 24 hours and submitted to microshear test. The data (MPa) were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). The results obtained for each group were: G1: 22.39±2.99; G2: 23.35±4.08; G3: 26.05±5.46; G4: 18.56±4.09; G5: 25.26±4.10. Statistical analysis showed significantly lower microshear bond strength for G4. Fracture pattern analysis showed predominance of adhesive failures in G1 and G2. G3 and G5 presented higher percentage of cohesive failures in ceramic, and G4 showed mixed, adhesive and cohesive fractures with similar percentages. It was concluded that different silanes showed influence on the lithium disilicate ceramic – resin cement bond strength. Resumo O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes silanos comerciais na resistência de união ao microcisalhamento do cimento resinoso à cerâmica de dissilicato de lítio. Foram confeccionadas 20 amostras de cerâmica (10mm de comprimento, 10mm de largura e 3mm de espessura), condicionadas com ácido fluorídrico a 10% por 20 segundos e divididas em 5 grupos, de acordo com o silano aplicado: G1- RelyX Ceramic Primer (3M ESPE), G2- Silano Angelus, G3-Prosil (FGM), G4- Silano Dentsply e G5-Bis-Silane (Bisco). Matrizes de silicone por adição (1 mm de espessura, 10 mm de diâmetro e 3 perfurações com 1 mm de diâmetro) foram colocadas sobre a cerâmica e preenchidas com cimento resinoso RelyX ARC (3M ESPE). A fotoativação foi realizada com LED Bluephase G2 (Ivoclar Vivadent) a 1200 mW/cm2, por 30 segundos. As amostras foram mantidas em 100% de umidade a 37°C por 24 horas e submetidas ao teste de microcisalhamento. Os dados (Mpa) (G1: 22,39+2,99; G2: 23,35+4,08; G3: 26,05+5,46; G4: 18,56+ 4,09; G5: 25,26+4,10) foram submetidos a análise de variância e ao teste de Tukey (p<0,05). A análise estatística mostrou valor de resistência de união significantemente menor para G4. A análise do padrão de fratura mostrou predominância de falha adesiva para G1 e G2. G3 e G5 apresentaram maior porcentagem de falha coesiva em cerâmica, e o G4 apresentou fraturas mista, adesiva e coesiva com igual porcentagem. Concluiu - se que os diferentes silanos apresentaram influência na resistência de união do cimento resinoso à cerâmica de dissilicato de lítio. Palavras-chave: Silanos. Cerâmica. Cimentação. Resistência ao Cisalhamento. EDUFU2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4794810.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-47948Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 310-315Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 310-3151981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47948/27578Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2020 Jamille Favarão, Maurício Matté Zanini, Guilherme Bottene Guarda, Marcio José Mendonça, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Simonides Consani, Eliseu Augusto Sicolihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFavarão, JamilleZanini, Maurício MattéGuarda, Guilherme BotteneMendonça, Marcio JoséSinhoreti, Mário Alexandre CoelhoConsani, SimonidesSicoli, Eliseu Augusto2022-01-20T21:39:53Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/47948Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-20T21:39:53Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic Efeito de silanos comerciais na resistência de união do cimento resinoso à cerâmica de dissilicato de lítio |
| title |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic |
| spellingShingle |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic Favarão, Jamille Silanes Ceramics Cementation Shear strength. Health Sciences |
| title_short |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic |
| title_full |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic |
| title_fullStr |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic |
| title_sort |
Effect of commercial silanes on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic |
| author |
Favarão, Jamille |
| author_facet |
Favarão, Jamille Zanini, Maurício Matté Guarda, Guilherme Bottene Mendonça, Marcio José Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho Consani, Simonides Sicoli, Eliseu Augusto |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Zanini, Maurício Matté Guarda, Guilherme Bottene Mendonça, Marcio José Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho Consani, Simonides Sicoli, Eliseu Augusto |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Favarão, Jamille Zanini, Maurício Matté Guarda, Guilherme Bottene Mendonça, Marcio José Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho Consani, Simonides Sicoli, Eliseu Augusto |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Silanes Ceramics Cementation Shear strength. Health Sciences |
| topic |
Silanes Ceramics Cementation Shear strength. Health Sciences |
| description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different commercial silanes on microshear bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty ceramic samples with 10 mm in length, 10 mm wide and 3 mm in thickness were fabricated, etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds, and divided into 5 groups, according to the commercial silane applied: G1- RelyX Ceramic Primer (3M ESPE), G2- Angelus Silane, G3- Prosil (FGM), G4- Dentsply Silane (Dentsply) and G5- Bis-Silane (Bisco). Silanes were applied in accordance to manufacturers’ recommendations. Addition silicone molds with 1 mm in thickness, 10 mm in diameter and 3 perforations with 1 mm in diameter each one, were placed on ceramic and filled with the resin cement Rely X ARC (3M ESPE) in all groups. Light activation was performed with LED Bluephase G2 (Ivoclar Vivadent) at 1200 mW/cm2, for 30 seconds. Samples were maintained in 100% humidity at 37°C for 24 hours and submitted to microshear test. The data (MPa) were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). The results obtained for each group were: G1: 22.39±2.99; G2: 23.35±4.08; G3: 26.05±5.46; G4: 18.56±4.09; G5: 25.26±4.10. Statistical analysis showed significantly lower microshear bond strength for G4. Fracture pattern analysis showed predominance of adhesive failures in G1 and G2. G3 and G5 presented higher percentage of cohesive failures in ceramic, and G4 showed mixed, adhesive and cohesive fractures with similar percentages. It was concluded that different silanes showed influence on the lithium disilicate ceramic – resin cement bond strength. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47948 10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-47948 |
| url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47948 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-47948 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47948/27578 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 310-315 Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 310-315 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
| instacron_str |
UFU |
| institution |
UFU |
| reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
| collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
| _version_ |
1797069081686310912 |