Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miguel, Divino Levi
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Eliane Maria Ribeiro da, Silva, Cristiane Figueira da, Pereira, Marcos Gervasio, Leite, Luiz Fernando Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42704
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of agroforestry systems of different ages (AFS1: one-year old; AFS5: five-years old) on the biological attributes of soil; the following systems were used for comparison: a slash-and-burn (SBF) farming area, Caatinga which has been undergoing regeneration for 6 years (CaR6), and native Caatinga (NCa) in Brazil. Enzyme activity, abundance and composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and production of glomalin-related soil proteins (GRSP) were evaluated at soil depths of 0–0.05 m. AMF species composition in the AFS was more similar to that in the NCa than in the SBF and CaR6 systems. In the rainy season, sporulation was most abundant in the AFS-1, CaR6, and SBF systems, whereas GRSP concentrations were highest in the AFS5 during the dry season. Acid phosphatase and arylsulfatase enzyme activity was lower in the AFS1 soils than in the NCa and SBF soils (rainy period), and levels of β-glucosidase and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis in the AFS were equal to or higher than those in the NCa in the dry season but lower in the rainy season. AFS thus appear to promote the maintenance of soil biological quality, and may be more sustainable than SBF farming systems in the Brazilian Caatinga over the long term.
id UFU-14_2cc696a58a3488d4f1066c304f13481d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42704
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native CaatingaPropriedades microbiológicas e atividade enzimática do solo sob sistemas agroflorestais comparado com monocultura, regeneração natural e Caatinga nativaAcid phosphatase.β-glucosidase.FDA.ArylsulfataseSoil management.Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores.Agricultural SciencesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of agroforestry systems of different ages (AFS1: one-year old; AFS5: five-years old) on the biological attributes of soil; the following systems were used for comparison: a slash-and-burn (SBF) farming area, Caatinga which has been undergoing regeneration for 6 years (CaR6), and native Caatinga (NCa) in Brazil. Enzyme activity, abundance and composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and production of glomalin-related soil proteins (GRSP) were evaluated at soil depths of 0–0.05 m. AMF species composition in the AFS was more similar to that in the NCa than in the SBF and CaR6 systems. In the rainy season, sporulation was most abundant in the AFS-1, CaR6, and SBF systems, whereas GRSP concentrations were highest in the AFS5 during the dry season. Acid phosphatase and arylsulfatase enzyme activity was lower in the AFS1 soils than in the NCa and SBF soils (rainy period), and levels of β-glucosidase and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis in the AFS were equal to or higher than those in the NCa in the dry season but lower in the rainy season. AFS thus appear to promote the maintenance of soil biological quality, and may be more sustainable than SBF farming systems in the Brazilian Caatinga over the long term.O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a influência de sistemas agroflorestais (AFS1: um ano de idade; AFS5: cinco anos de idade), nos atributos biológicos do solo usando como referência, uma área de agricultura de corte e queima (SBF), Caatinga em regeneração há 6 anos (CaR6), e Caatinga nativa (NCa), in Brasil. A atividade enzimática, a abundância e composição dos fungos micorrízicos arbusculares (AMF), e a produção de proteína do solo relacionada à glomalina (GRSP) foram avaliados, na profundidade de 0-5 cm do solo. A composição das espécies de AMF nos AFS foi mais semelhante a observada na NCa, do que os sistemas SBF e CaR6. Na estação chuvosa, a esporulação foi mais abundante em AFS-1, CaR6 and SBF quando comparada as outras áreas, enquanto a GRSP apresentou maiores teores no AFS5 no período seco. AFS1 apresentou atividade da fosfatase ácida e arilsulfatase inferiores tanto a NCa quanto a SBF, no período chuvoso. No período seco, a atividade de β-glicosidase e a hidrólise do diacetato de fluoresceína (FDA) na AFS foram iguais ou superiores a Nca, mas menor no período chuvoso. Verifica-se que os AFS são potenciais para a manutenção da qualidade biológica do solo, podendo, em longo prazo, serem mais sustentáveis que a SBF, em ambiente de Caatinga.EDUFU2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4270410.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42704Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 1-16Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 1-161981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42704/27503Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2020 Divino Levi Miguel, Eliane Maria Ribeiro da Silva, Cristiane Figueira da Silva, Marcos Gervasio Pereira, Luiz Fernando Carvalho Leitehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiguel, Divino LeviSilva, Eliane Maria Ribeiro daSilva, Cristiane Figueira daPereira, Marcos GervasioLeite, Luiz Fernando Carvalho2022-01-14T19:42:17Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42704Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-14T19:42:17Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga
Propriedades microbiológicas e atividade enzimática do solo sob sistemas agroflorestais comparado com monocultura, regeneração natural e Caatinga nativa
title Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga
spellingShingle Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga
Miguel, Divino Levi
Acid phosphatase.
β-glucosidase.
FDA.
Arylsulfatase
Soil management.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores.
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga
title_full Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga
title_fullStr Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga
title_full_unstemmed Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga
title_sort Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga
author Miguel, Divino Levi
author_facet Miguel, Divino Levi
Silva, Eliane Maria Ribeiro da
Silva, Cristiane Figueira da
Pereira, Marcos Gervasio
Leite, Luiz Fernando Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Silva, Eliane Maria Ribeiro da
Silva, Cristiane Figueira da
Pereira, Marcos Gervasio
Leite, Luiz Fernando Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miguel, Divino Levi
Silva, Eliane Maria Ribeiro da
Silva, Cristiane Figueira da
Pereira, Marcos Gervasio
Leite, Luiz Fernando Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acid phosphatase.
β-glucosidase.
FDA.
Arylsulfatase
Soil management.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores.
Agricultural Sciences
topic Acid phosphatase.
β-glucosidase.
FDA.
Arylsulfatase
Soil management.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores.
Agricultural Sciences
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of agroforestry systems of different ages (AFS1: one-year old; AFS5: five-years old) on the biological attributes of soil; the following systems were used for comparison: a slash-and-burn (SBF) farming area, Caatinga which has been undergoing regeneration for 6 years (CaR6), and native Caatinga (NCa) in Brazil. Enzyme activity, abundance and composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and production of glomalin-related soil proteins (GRSP) were evaluated at soil depths of 0–0.05 m. AMF species composition in the AFS was more similar to that in the NCa than in the SBF and CaR6 systems. In the rainy season, sporulation was most abundant in the AFS-1, CaR6, and SBF systems, whereas GRSP concentrations were highest in the AFS5 during the dry season. Acid phosphatase and arylsulfatase enzyme activity was lower in the AFS1 soils than in the NCa and SBF soils (rainy period), and levels of β-glucosidase and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis in the AFS were equal to or higher than those in the NCa in the dry season but lower in the rainy season. AFS thus appear to promote the maintenance of soil biological quality, and may be more sustainable than SBF farming systems in the Brazilian Caatinga over the long term.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42704
10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42704
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42704
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42704
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42704/27503
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 1-16
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 1-16
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069080933433344