Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Camilo, Michele Gabriel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Fernandes, Alberto Magno, Oliveira, Tadeu Silva de, Baffa, Danielle Ferreira, Bernardo, Sarah Ellen Eduardo, Cordeiro, Camila da Conceição
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47870
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the morphogenetic traits and chemical composition of Tanzania grass using a fixed rest period or according to light interception at 95%. The treatments consisted of evaluations of two Tanzania-grass pasture-management strategies: (1) LI95 - animals entered the paddocks when the pasture reached 95% of light interception (LI), with three days of paddock occupation; and (2) FR - the pasture was managed with a defoliation interval (DI) of 30 days, and three days of paddock occupation. The experimental area consisted of 4 ha, with 22 paddocks per treatments. Ten recently-calved cows were used per treatment in year 1, and eight cows were used per treatment in year 2. Sward height, forage mass, and morphological components and their chemical composition were evaluated. The management strategies used on the Tanzania grass pasture did not affect pasture mass or height in the pre- and post-grazing conditions, or the proportion of stems. However, the proportion of leaves was greater in the paddocks with 95% light interception. The crude protein content was higher in the paddocks with 95% light interception; the other nutrients were not affected. In conclusion, management adopting 95% light interception does not influence morphogenetic traits. Nevertheless, it promotes an increase in the crude protein content of grasses.
id UFU-14_4613a4d3cd901ccc783bf39b2f2e514d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/47870
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategiesEvaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategiesCutting intensity.Light interception.Paddocks.Stocking rate.VeterinaryIntensidade de desfolha.Interceptação luminosa.Piquetes.Taxa de lotação.Vacas mestiças.The objective of this study was to evaluate the morphogenetic traits and chemical composition of Tanzania grass using a fixed rest period or according to light interception at 95%. The treatments consisted of evaluations of two Tanzania-grass pasture-management strategies: (1) LI95 - animals entered the paddocks when the pasture reached 95% of light interception (LI), with three days of paddock occupation; and (2) FR - the pasture was managed with a defoliation interval (DI) of 30 days, and three days of paddock occupation. The experimental area consisted of 4 ha, with 22 paddocks per treatments. Ten recently-calved cows were used per treatment in year 1, and eight cows were used per treatment in year 2. Sward height, forage mass, and morphological components and their chemical composition were evaluated. The management strategies used on the Tanzania grass pasture did not affect pasture mass or height in the pre- and post-grazing conditions, or the proportion of stems. However, the proportion of leaves was greater in the paddocks with 95% light interception. The crude protein content was higher in the paddocks with 95% light interception; the other nutrients were not affected. In conclusion, management adopting 95% light interception does not influence morphogenetic traits. Nevertheless, it promotes an increase in the crude protein content of grasses.EDUFU2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4787010.14393/BJ-v36n6a2020-47870Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2020): Nov./Dec.; 2142-2152Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 6 (2020): Nov./Dec.; 2142-21521981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47870/30424Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2020 Michele Gabriel Camilo, Alberto Magno Fernandes, Tadeu Silva de Oliveira, Danielle Ferreira Baffa, Sarah Ellen Eduardo Bernardo, Camila da Conceição Cordeirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamilo, Michele GabrielFernandes, Alberto MagnoOliveira, Tadeu Silva de Baffa, Danielle Ferreira Bernardo, Sarah Ellen Eduardo Cordeiro, Camila da Conceição 2022-05-30T18:50:06Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/47870Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-30T18:50:06Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
title Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
spellingShingle Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
Camilo, Michele Gabriel
Cutting intensity.
Light interception.
Paddocks.
Stocking rate.
Veterinary
Intensidade de desfolha.
Interceptação luminosa.
Piquetes.
Taxa de lotação.
Vacas mestiças.
title_short Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
title_full Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
title_fullStr Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
title_sort Evaluation of the availability of mass of forage: morphological responses and chemical composition of Tanzania grass subjected to two pasture-management strategies
author Camilo, Michele Gabriel
author_facet Camilo, Michele Gabriel
Fernandes, Alberto Magno
Oliveira, Tadeu Silva de
Baffa, Danielle Ferreira
Bernardo, Sarah Ellen Eduardo
Cordeiro, Camila da Conceição
author_role author
author2 Fernandes, Alberto Magno
Oliveira, Tadeu Silva de
Baffa, Danielle Ferreira
Bernardo, Sarah Ellen Eduardo
Cordeiro, Camila da Conceição
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Camilo, Michele Gabriel
Fernandes, Alberto Magno
Oliveira, Tadeu Silva de
Baffa, Danielle Ferreira
Bernardo, Sarah Ellen Eduardo
Cordeiro, Camila da Conceição
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cutting intensity.
Light interception.
Paddocks.
Stocking rate.
Veterinary
Intensidade de desfolha.
Interceptação luminosa.
Piquetes.
Taxa de lotação.
Vacas mestiças.
topic Cutting intensity.
Light interception.
Paddocks.
Stocking rate.
Veterinary
Intensidade de desfolha.
Interceptação luminosa.
Piquetes.
Taxa de lotação.
Vacas mestiças.
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the morphogenetic traits and chemical composition of Tanzania grass using a fixed rest period or according to light interception at 95%. The treatments consisted of evaluations of two Tanzania-grass pasture-management strategies: (1) LI95 - animals entered the paddocks when the pasture reached 95% of light interception (LI), with three days of paddock occupation; and (2) FR - the pasture was managed with a defoliation interval (DI) of 30 days, and three days of paddock occupation. The experimental area consisted of 4 ha, with 22 paddocks per treatments. Ten recently-calved cows were used per treatment in year 1, and eight cows were used per treatment in year 2. Sward height, forage mass, and morphological components and their chemical composition were evaluated. The management strategies used on the Tanzania grass pasture did not affect pasture mass or height in the pre- and post-grazing conditions, or the proportion of stems. However, the proportion of leaves was greater in the paddocks with 95% light interception. The crude protein content was higher in the paddocks with 95% light interception; the other nutrients were not affected. In conclusion, management adopting 95% light interception does not influence morphogenetic traits. Nevertheless, it promotes an increase in the crude protein content of grasses.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47870
10.14393/BJ-v36n6a2020-47870
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47870
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n6a2020-47870
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47870/30424
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2020): Nov./Dec.; 2142-2152
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 6 (2020): Nov./Dec.; 2142-2152
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069081171460096