Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Carlos Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Hélio Wilson Lemos de, Teodoro, Adenir Vieira, Barros, Inácio de, Carvalho, Luciana Marques de, Soares Filho, Walter dos Santos, Passos, Orlando Sampaio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/46413
Resumo: This study aimed at evaluating the agronomical performance of ‘Pineapple’ sweet orange grafted on ten rootstocks, in 2011-2017 harvests, so as to recommend the best combinations to be commercially explored in citrus growing regions in Bahia and Sergipe states, Brazil. An experiment was installed to test ten rootstock for 'pineapple' sweet orange: 'Santa Cruz' Rangpur lime, 'Red Rough' Lemon, 'Orlando' Tangelo, 'Sunki Tropical' Mandarin, 'Swingle' citrumelo, the citrandarins 'Indio' and 'Riverside' and the hybrids HTR-051, LVKxLCR-010 and TSKxCTTR-002. The trial was installed in 2008 in the municipality of Umbauba in Sergipe. The experimental design was complete randomized blocks with four replications and two plants per plot. Plant spacing was 6 x 4 m which corresponds to 416 plants per hectare and the orchard was rainfed and followed conventional management. The following agronomical parameters were evaluated: vegetative growth, drought tolerance, yield and physico-chemical quality of fruits as well as the abundance of phytophagous mites. Both hybrids LVK x LCR – 010 and TSKC x CTTR-002 and the ‘Santa Cruz’ rangpur lime bestowed higher tolerance to the dry period on the ‘Pineapple’ orange tree, by comparison with higher water deficit susceptibility conferred by the ‘Orlando’ tangelo and the ‘Swingle’ citrumelo. Rootstocks HTR-051, ‘Riverside’ citrandarin, ‘Swingle’ citrumelo and TSKC x CTTR-02 induced plants to remain small and, thus, showed aptitude for culture densification. Cumulative yield of the ‘Pineapple’ orange was higher on rootstocks ‘Red Rough’ lemon and ‘Santa Cruz’ Rangpur lime, the hybrid LVK x LCR-010 and ‘Sunki Tropical’. Yield efficiency was not influenced by the rootstocks. Physico-chemical quality of fruits of ‘Pineapple’ orange is affected by the rootstocks and meets the requirements of juice industries. Regarding plant resistance, the rootstocks did not influence the population density of mites P. oleivora, E. banksi and T. mexicanus on ‘Pineapple’ oranges. Results show that both rootstocks ‘Red Rough’ lemon and ‘Santa Cruz’ rangpur lime conferred high regularity to ‘Pineapple’ orange trees in citrus growing regions in Bahia and Sergipe states.
id UFU-14_68058988d2ca9556d5a1c8e3194221b9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/46413
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocksComportamento da laranjeira ‘pineapple’ em diferentes porta-enxertosCitrosfruticulturamelhoramento genéticofitotecniaAgricultural SciencesCitros.Eficiência produtiva.Ácaros fitófagos.Densidade de plantio.This study aimed at evaluating the agronomical performance of ‘Pineapple’ sweet orange grafted on ten rootstocks, in 2011-2017 harvests, so as to recommend the best combinations to be commercially explored in citrus growing regions in Bahia and Sergipe states, Brazil. An experiment was installed to test ten rootstock for 'pineapple' sweet orange: 'Santa Cruz' Rangpur lime, 'Red Rough' Lemon, 'Orlando' Tangelo, 'Sunki Tropical' Mandarin, 'Swingle' citrumelo, the citrandarins 'Indio' and 'Riverside' and the hybrids HTR-051, LVKxLCR-010 and TSKxCTTR-002. The trial was installed in 2008 in the municipality of Umbauba in Sergipe. The experimental design was complete randomized blocks with four replications and two plants per plot. Plant spacing was 6 x 4 m which corresponds to 416 plants per hectare and the orchard was rainfed and followed conventional management. The following agronomical parameters were evaluated: vegetative growth, drought tolerance, yield and physico-chemical quality of fruits as well as the abundance of phytophagous mites. Both hybrids LVK x LCR – 010 and TSKC x CTTR-002 and the ‘Santa Cruz’ rangpur lime bestowed higher tolerance to the dry period on the ‘Pineapple’ orange tree, by comparison with higher water deficit susceptibility conferred by the ‘Orlando’ tangelo and the ‘Swingle’ citrumelo. Rootstocks HTR-051, ‘Riverside’ citrandarin, ‘Swingle’ citrumelo and TSKC x CTTR-02 induced plants to remain small and, thus, showed aptitude for culture densification. Cumulative yield of the ‘Pineapple’ orange was higher on rootstocks ‘Red Rough’ lemon and ‘Santa Cruz’ Rangpur lime, the hybrid LVK x LCR-010 and ‘Sunki Tropical’. Yield efficiency was not influenced by the rootstocks. Physico-chemical quality of fruits of ‘Pineapple’ orange is affected by the rootstocks and meets the requirements of juice industries. Regarding plant resistance, the rootstocks did not influence the population density of mites P. oleivora, E. banksi and T. mexicanus on ‘Pineapple’ oranges. Results show that both rootstocks ‘Red Rough’ lemon and ‘Santa Cruz’ rangpur lime conferred high regularity to ‘Pineapple’ orange trees in citrus growing regions in Bahia and Sergipe states.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o desempenho agronômico da laranjeira ‘Pineapple’ em combinação com dez porta-enxertos, nas safras 2011-2017, com vistas à recomendação das melhores combinações para exploração comercial na região citrícola dos estados da Bahia e de Sergipe. O experimento consistiu de laranja doce 'pineapple' enxertado nos porta-enxertos limoeiros ‘Cravo Santa Cruz’, limoeiro ‘Rugoso Vermelho’, tangeleiro Orlando, tangerineira ‘Sunki’ Tropical, citrumelo ‘Swingle’, citrandarins ‘Indio’, ‘Riverside’, além dos híbridos HTR – 051 e LVK x LCR – 010 e ‘TSKC x CTTR – 002’. O trabalho foi instalado em 2008, no município de Umbaúba, em Sergipe, no delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições, duas plantas por parcela, no espaçamento de 6m x 4m, correspondendo a uma população de 416 plantas·ha-1, com manejo em sistema de produção convencional, sem o uso de irrigação. Os seguintes parâmetros agronômicos foram avaliados: crescimento vegetativo, tolerância à seca, produção e qualidade físico-química de frutos, além da abundância de ácaros fitófagos. Os híbridos LVK x LCR - 010 e TSKC x CTTR - 002, assim como o limoeiro ‘Cravo Santa Cruz’, conferiram um maior nível de tolerância ao período seco, em contraste com maior suscetibilidade à seca relacionada ao tangelo ‘Orlando’ e ao citrumelo ‘Swingle’. Os porta-enxertos HTR - 051, citrandarin ‘Riversidade’, citrumelo ‘Swingle’ e TSKC x CTTR - 002 induziram menor porte às plantas, demonstrando aptidão ao adensamento de plantio. A produção acumulada da laranjeira ‘Pineapple’ foi maior sobre os porta-enxertos limoeiros ‘Rugoso Vermelho’ e ‘Cravo Santa Cruz’, híbrido LVK x LCR - 010 e tangerineira ‘Sunki Tropical’. A eficiência produtiva não foi influenciada pelos porta-enxertos. A qualidade física e química de frutos da laranjeira ‘Pineapple’ foi afetada pelos porta-enxertos e atendeu aos padrões exigidos pela indústria de sucos. Os porta-enxertos estudados não causaram variações nos níveis de populações dos ácaros Phyllocptruta oleivora, Eutetranychus banksi e Tetranychus mexicanus. Com base nos resultados conclui-se que os limoeiros ‘Rugoso Vermelho’ e ‘Cravo Santa Cruz’ determinam maior regularidade de produção de frutos à laranjeira ‘Pineapple’ nas regiões produtoras da Bahia e de Sergipe.EDUFU2020-02-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4641310.14393/BJ-v36n2a2020-46413Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Mar./Apr.; 458-472Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 2 (2020): Mar./Abr; 458-4721981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/46413/28099Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2020 Carlos Roberto Martins, Hélio Wilson Lemos de Carvalho, Adenir Vieira Teodoro, Inácio de Barros, Luciana Marques de Carvalho, Walter dos Santos Soares Filho, Orlando Sampaio Passoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, Carlos RobertoCarvalho, Hélio Wilson Lemos deTeodoro, Adenir VieiraBarros, Inácio deCarvalho, Luciana Marques deSoares Filho, Walter dos SantosPassos, Orlando Sampaio2021-12-15T20:34:28Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/46413Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2021-12-15T20:34:28Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks
Comportamento da laranjeira ‘pineapple’ em diferentes porta-enxertos
title Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks
spellingShingle Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks
Martins, Carlos Roberto
Citros
fruticultura
melhoramento genético
fitotecnia
Agricultural Sciences
Citros.
Eficiência produtiva.
Ácaros fitófagos.
Densidade de plantio.
title_short Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks
title_full Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks
title_fullStr Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks
title_sort Performance of the pineapple sweet orange on different rootstocks
author Martins, Carlos Roberto
author_facet Martins, Carlos Roberto
Carvalho, Hélio Wilson Lemos de
Teodoro, Adenir Vieira
Barros, Inácio de
Carvalho, Luciana Marques de
Soares Filho, Walter dos Santos
Passos, Orlando Sampaio
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Hélio Wilson Lemos de
Teodoro, Adenir Vieira
Barros, Inácio de
Carvalho, Luciana Marques de
Soares Filho, Walter dos Santos
Passos, Orlando Sampaio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Carlos Roberto
Carvalho, Hélio Wilson Lemos de
Teodoro, Adenir Vieira
Barros, Inácio de
Carvalho, Luciana Marques de
Soares Filho, Walter dos Santos
Passos, Orlando Sampaio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Citros
fruticultura
melhoramento genético
fitotecnia
Agricultural Sciences
Citros.
Eficiência produtiva.
Ácaros fitófagos.
Densidade de plantio.
topic Citros
fruticultura
melhoramento genético
fitotecnia
Agricultural Sciences
Citros.
Eficiência produtiva.
Ácaros fitófagos.
Densidade de plantio.
description This study aimed at evaluating the agronomical performance of ‘Pineapple’ sweet orange grafted on ten rootstocks, in 2011-2017 harvests, so as to recommend the best combinations to be commercially explored in citrus growing regions in Bahia and Sergipe states, Brazil. An experiment was installed to test ten rootstock for 'pineapple' sweet orange: 'Santa Cruz' Rangpur lime, 'Red Rough' Lemon, 'Orlando' Tangelo, 'Sunki Tropical' Mandarin, 'Swingle' citrumelo, the citrandarins 'Indio' and 'Riverside' and the hybrids HTR-051, LVKxLCR-010 and TSKxCTTR-002. The trial was installed in 2008 in the municipality of Umbauba in Sergipe. The experimental design was complete randomized blocks with four replications and two plants per plot. Plant spacing was 6 x 4 m which corresponds to 416 plants per hectare and the orchard was rainfed and followed conventional management. The following agronomical parameters were evaluated: vegetative growth, drought tolerance, yield and physico-chemical quality of fruits as well as the abundance of phytophagous mites. Both hybrids LVK x LCR – 010 and TSKC x CTTR-002 and the ‘Santa Cruz’ rangpur lime bestowed higher tolerance to the dry period on the ‘Pineapple’ orange tree, by comparison with higher water deficit susceptibility conferred by the ‘Orlando’ tangelo and the ‘Swingle’ citrumelo. Rootstocks HTR-051, ‘Riverside’ citrandarin, ‘Swingle’ citrumelo and TSKC x CTTR-02 induced plants to remain small and, thus, showed aptitude for culture densification. Cumulative yield of the ‘Pineapple’ orange was higher on rootstocks ‘Red Rough’ lemon and ‘Santa Cruz’ Rangpur lime, the hybrid LVK x LCR-010 and ‘Sunki Tropical’. Yield efficiency was not influenced by the rootstocks. Physico-chemical quality of fruits of ‘Pineapple’ orange is affected by the rootstocks and meets the requirements of juice industries. Regarding plant resistance, the rootstocks did not influence the population density of mites P. oleivora, E. banksi and T. mexicanus on ‘Pineapple’ oranges. Results show that both rootstocks ‘Red Rough’ lemon and ‘Santa Cruz’ rangpur lime conferred high regularity to ‘Pineapple’ orange trees in citrus growing regions in Bahia and Sergipe states.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/46413
10.14393/BJ-v36n2a2020-46413
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/46413
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n2a2020-46413
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/46413/28099
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Mar./Apr.; 458-472
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 2 (2020): Mar./Abr; 458-472
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069081042485248