Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ottoni, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Teixeira, Alex de Matos, Gonçalves, Lúcio Carlos, da Silva, Naiara Taís Alves, Cruz, Diego Soares Gonçalves, Côrtes, Isabella Hoske Gruppioni, de Oliveira, João Pedro Costa Alves, Jayme, Diogo Gonzaga
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48179
Resumo: The objective of this work was to determine the impact of cutting Tifton-85 grass at 14, 28, 42, 46, 70, and 80 days of regrowth on its production and nutritional characteristics during the rainy season. The study area of 238 m2 was divided into four sub-area, with 6 plots of 2 × 2 m spaced 1 m between plots and 2 m between sub-area. Random block design was used. The statistical analyses were performed following a randomized block design. Results were obtained as means from evaluations conducted in two consecutive years. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) increased as the cutting age increased. However, crude protein, NDF nitrogen, ADF nitrogen and leaves/stem relationship decreased as the cutting age increased. The production of digestible dry matter increased linearly as the cutting age increased. Similarly, grass height, green matter and dry matter production (DMP) increased as the cutting age increased. The different cutting age did not influence the nitrogen A, B1 + B2, and B3 fractions of the grass. However, the C fraction increased as the cutting age increased. Longer intervals between cuts increased the grass productivity per cut, but compromised its nutritional composition and leaves/stem relationship. For Tifton -85, the regrowth age of 28 days allows greater production of dry matter and greater accumulated production of crude protein and digestive dry matter in the rainy season or over time.
id UFU-14_68bce8647b176c6b1445e62d0e741568
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/48179
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient valueOTIMIZAÇÃO DE CORTE DO CAPIM TIFTON 85 PARA PRODUTIVIDADE E VALOR NUTRITIVOCynodon spp.DigestibilityNutritional ValueTropical Grass.VeterinaryCynodon spp. Digestibility. Nutritional Value. Tropical Grass.The objective of this work was to determine the impact of cutting Tifton-85 grass at 14, 28, 42, 46, 70, and 80 days of regrowth on its production and nutritional characteristics during the rainy season. The study area of 238 m2 was divided into four sub-area, with 6 plots of 2 × 2 m spaced 1 m between plots and 2 m between sub-area. Random block design was used. The statistical analyses were performed following a randomized block design. Results were obtained as means from evaluations conducted in two consecutive years. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) increased as the cutting age increased. However, crude protein, NDF nitrogen, ADF nitrogen and leaves/stem relationship decreased as the cutting age increased. The production of digestible dry matter increased linearly as the cutting age increased. Similarly, grass height, green matter and dry matter production (DMP) increased as the cutting age increased. The different cutting age did not influence the nitrogen A, B1 + B2, and B3 fractions of the grass. However, the C fraction increased as the cutting age increased. Longer intervals between cuts increased the grass productivity per cut, but compromised its nutritional composition and leaves/stem relationship. For Tifton -85, the regrowth age of 28 days allows greater production of dry matter and greater accumulated production of crude protein and digestive dry matter in the rainy season or over time.Objetivou-se com este trabalho determinar os parâmetros produtivos e nutricionais do capim 193 Tifton-85 aos 14, 28, 42, 56, 70 e 84 dias de rebrota durante a estação chuvosa. Uma área de 238 m2 foi dividida 194 em quatro faixas, cada uma com 6 parcelas de 2 x 2 m distantes de 1 metro entre parcelas e 2 metros entre as 195 faixas. Utilizou-se delineamento de blocos ao acaso. Os resultados foram obtidos pela média de três avalições 196 realizadas em dois anos consecutivos. A produção de matéria seca digestível aumentou linearmente com o 197 avanço da idade de corte. O mesmo ocorreu com a altura, produção de matéria verde e produção de matéria 198 seca, embora a proteína bruta e a relação folha/colmo tenham diminuído com o aumento da idade de corte. 199 Além disso, a fibra insolúvel em detergente neutro (FDN), nitrogênio em FDN, fibra insolúvel em detergente 200 ácido (FDA) e o nitrogênio em FDA aumentaram com o aumento da idade de corte. A idade de corte da planta 201 não alterou as frações nitrogenadas A, B1 + B2, B3. No entanto a fração C aumentou com o avanço da idade 202 de corte. Intervalos de cortes maiores aumentam a produtividade da gramínea por corte, mas comprometem a 203 composição nutricional e a relação folha/colmo do capim Tifton-85.EDUFU2021-01-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4817910.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-48179Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37009Bioscience Journal ; v. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e370091981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48179/30903Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2021 Daniel Ottoni, Alex de Matos Teixeira, Lúcio Carlos Gonçalves, Naiara Taís Alves da Silva, Diego Soares Gonçalves Cruz, Isabella Hoske Gruppioni Côrtes, João Pedro Costa Alves de Oliveira, Diogo Gonzaga Jaymehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOttoni, DanielTeixeira, Alex de MatosGonçalves, Lúcio Carlosda Silva, Naiara Taís AlvesCruz, Diego Soares Gonçalves Côrtes, Isabella Hoske Gruppionide Oliveira, João Pedro Costa AlvesJayme, Diogo Gonzaga2022-05-25T11:40:30Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/48179Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-25T11:40:30Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value
OTIMIZAÇÃO DE CORTE DO CAPIM TIFTON 85 PARA PRODUTIVIDADE E VALOR NUTRITIVO
title Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value
spellingShingle Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value
Ottoni, Daniel
Cynodon spp.
Digestibility
Nutritional Value
Tropical Grass.
Veterinary
Cynodon spp. Digestibility. Nutritional Value. Tropical Grass.
title_short Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value
title_full Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value
title_fullStr Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value
title_full_unstemmed Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value
title_sort Optimization Tifton-85 grass cutting for productivity and nutrient value
author Ottoni, Daniel
author_facet Ottoni, Daniel
Teixeira, Alex de Matos
Gonçalves, Lúcio Carlos
da Silva, Naiara Taís Alves
Cruz, Diego Soares Gonçalves
Côrtes, Isabella Hoske Gruppioni
de Oliveira, João Pedro Costa Alves
Jayme, Diogo Gonzaga
author_role author
author2 Teixeira, Alex de Matos
Gonçalves, Lúcio Carlos
da Silva, Naiara Taís Alves
Cruz, Diego Soares Gonçalves
Côrtes, Isabella Hoske Gruppioni
de Oliveira, João Pedro Costa Alves
Jayme, Diogo Gonzaga
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ottoni, Daniel
Teixeira, Alex de Matos
Gonçalves, Lúcio Carlos
da Silva, Naiara Taís Alves
Cruz, Diego Soares Gonçalves
Côrtes, Isabella Hoske Gruppioni
de Oliveira, João Pedro Costa Alves
Jayme, Diogo Gonzaga
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cynodon spp.
Digestibility
Nutritional Value
Tropical Grass.
Veterinary
Cynodon spp. Digestibility. Nutritional Value. Tropical Grass.
topic Cynodon spp.
Digestibility
Nutritional Value
Tropical Grass.
Veterinary
Cynodon spp. Digestibility. Nutritional Value. Tropical Grass.
description The objective of this work was to determine the impact of cutting Tifton-85 grass at 14, 28, 42, 46, 70, and 80 days of regrowth on its production and nutritional characteristics during the rainy season. The study area of 238 m2 was divided into four sub-area, with 6 plots of 2 × 2 m spaced 1 m between plots and 2 m between sub-area. Random block design was used. The statistical analyses were performed following a randomized block design. Results were obtained as means from evaluations conducted in two consecutive years. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) increased as the cutting age increased. However, crude protein, NDF nitrogen, ADF nitrogen and leaves/stem relationship decreased as the cutting age increased. The production of digestible dry matter increased linearly as the cutting age increased. Similarly, grass height, green matter and dry matter production (DMP) increased as the cutting age increased. The different cutting age did not influence the nitrogen A, B1 + B2, and B3 fractions of the grass. However, the C fraction increased as the cutting age increased. Longer intervals between cuts increased the grass productivity per cut, but compromised its nutritional composition and leaves/stem relationship. For Tifton -85, the regrowth age of 28 days allows greater production of dry matter and greater accumulated production of crude protein and digestive dry matter in the rainy season or over time.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48179
10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-48179
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48179
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-48179
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/48179/30903
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37009
Bioscience Journal ; v. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37009
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069081819480064