Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37533 |
Resumo: | to identify the adherence of the surgical team to the safety procedures recommended for safe surgery and to correlate the scores to the time of surgery. This is a observational and quantitative field study performed at the Surgical Center Unit of a public teaching hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil, with a sample of 80 patients. For the data collection, the instrument Standard Model for Verification of Surgical Patient Safety was applied for a period of three months. The mean general score of the instrument was 60.4 points, with maximum and minimum values of 71.4 and 46.3, respectively. The mean surgical safety scores assessed were 75.2 points before anesthetic induction; 67.1 points before the surgical incision and 23.1 points before leaving the operating room. The instrument count performed by at least two people, audibly, with separation of items during count, was not performed in 100% of the surgical procedures observed. The count of materials used in the procedure in an individualized way was not performed in 100% of the surgical procedures. The mean surgery time found was 158.2 minutes. The bivariate analysis showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between the time of surgery and the surgical safety scores. It was evidenced a low adhesion of the surgical team to the safety procedures recommended by ANVISA. There was no correlation between the surgical time and the scores found. |
id |
UFU-14_6d7108b0e3a8d4dd68e78d6a705f8e36 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/37533 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital Segurança do paciente cirúrgico em um hospital público de ensino Patient SafetyOperating RoomsChecklistBiological Sciencesto identify the adherence of the surgical team to the safety procedures recommended for safe surgery and to correlate the scores to the time of surgery. This is a observational and quantitative field study performed at the Surgical Center Unit of a public teaching hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil, with a sample of 80 patients. For the data collection, the instrument Standard Model for Verification of Surgical Patient Safety was applied for a period of three months. The mean general score of the instrument was 60.4 points, with maximum and minimum values of 71.4 and 46.3, respectively. The mean surgical safety scores assessed were 75.2 points before anesthetic induction; 67.1 points before the surgical incision and 23.1 points before leaving the operating room. The instrument count performed by at least two people, audibly, with separation of items during count, was not performed in 100% of the surgical procedures observed. The count of materials used in the procedure in an individualized way was not performed in 100% of the surgical procedures. The mean surgery time found was 158.2 minutes. The bivariate analysis showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between the time of surgery and the surgical safety scores. It was evidenced a low adhesion of the surgical team to the safety procedures recommended by ANVISA. There was no correlation between the surgical time and the scores found.Identificar a adesão da equipe cirúrgica aos procedimentos de segurança preconizados para cirurgia segura e correlacionar os escores encontrados ao tempo de cirurgia. Estudo observacional e quantitativo, realizado na Unidade de Centro Cirúrgico de um hospital público de ensino de Minas Gerais, Brasil, com amostra de 80 pacientes. Para a coleta de dados, foi aplicado o instrumento Modelo Padrão para Verificação da Segurança do Paciente Cirúrgico por um período de três meses. O escore geral médio do instrumento foi de 60,4 pontos, com valores máximos e mínimos de 71,4 e 46,3, respectivamente. Os escores médios de segurança cirúrgica foram: 75,2 pontos antes da indução anestésica; 67,1 pontos antes da incisão cirúrgica e 23,1 pontos antes de sair da sala de operação. Em 100% dos procedimentos cirúrgicos não foi realizado a contagem dos instrumentais por pelo menos duas pessoas, de forma audível, com separação dos itens durante a contagem. A contagem de materiais utilizados no procedimento de maneira individualizada não foi realizada em 100% dos procedimentos cirúrgicos. O tempo de cirurgia médio encontrado foi de 158,2 minutos. A análise bivariada demonstrou que não houve correlação estatisticamente significativa entre o tempo de cirurgia com os escores de segurança cirúrgica. Foi evidenciada uma baixa adesão da equipe cirúrgica aos procedimentos de segurança recomendados pela ANVISA. Não houve correlação entre o tempo cirúrgico e os escores encontrados.EDUFU2017-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3753310.14393/BJ-v34n1a2018-37533Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): Jan./Feb.; 214-222Bioscience Journal ; v. 34 n. 1 (2018): Jan./Feb.; 214-2221981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37533/21471Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2017 Isadora Braga Calegari, Karoline Faria de Oliveira, Quênia Cristina Gonçalves da Silva, Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro, Regiane Evangelista Chaves Isidoro, Lúcia Aparecida Ferreira, Maria Beatriz Guimarães Ferreira, Maria Helena Barbosahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCalegari, Isadora BragaOliveira, Karoline Faria deSilva, Quênia Cristina Gonçalves daCordeiro, Aldenora Laísa Paiva de CarvalhoIsidoro, Regiane Evangelista ChavesFerreira, Lúcia AparecidaFerreira, Maria Beatriz GuimarãesBarbosa, Maria Helena2022-02-11T15:11:00Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/37533Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-11T15:11Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital Segurança do paciente cirúrgico em um hospital público de ensino |
title |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital |
spellingShingle |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital Calegari, Isadora Braga Patient Safety Operating Rooms Checklist Biological Sciences |
title_short |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital |
title_full |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital |
title_fullStr |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital |
title_sort |
Surgical patient safety in a public teaching hospital |
author |
Calegari, Isadora Braga |
author_facet |
Calegari, Isadora Braga Oliveira, Karoline Faria de Silva, Quênia Cristina Gonçalves da Cordeiro, Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Isidoro, Regiane Evangelista Chaves Ferreira, Lúcia Aparecida Ferreira, Maria Beatriz Guimarães Barbosa, Maria Helena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Karoline Faria de Silva, Quênia Cristina Gonçalves da Cordeiro, Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Isidoro, Regiane Evangelista Chaves Ferreira, Lúcia Aparecida Ferreira, Maria Beatriz Guimarães Barbosa, Maria Helena |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Calegari, Isadora Braga Oliveira, Karoline Faria de Silva, Quênia Cristina Gonçalves da Cordeiro, Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Isidoro, Regiane Evangelista Chaves Ferreira, Lúcia Aparecida Ferreira, Maria Beatriz Guimarães Barbosa, Maria Helena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Patient Safety Operating Rooms Checklist Biological Sciences |
topic |
Patient Safety Operating Rooms Checklist Biological Sciences |
description |
to identify the adherence of the surgical team to the safety procedures recommended for safe surgery and to correlate the scores to the time of surgery. This is a observational and quantitative field study performed at the Surgical Center Unit of a public teaching hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil, with a sample of 80 patients. For the data collection, the instrument Standard Model for Verification of Surgical Patient Safety was applied for a period of three months. The mean general score of the instrument was 60.4 points, with maximum and minimum values of 71.4 and 46.3, respectively. The mean surgical safety scores assessed were 75.2 points before anesthetic induction; 67.1 points before the surgical incision and 23.1 points before leaving the operating room. The instrument count performed by at least two people, audibly, with separation of items during count, was not performed in 100% of the surgical procedures observed. The count of materials used in the procedure in an individualized way was not performed in 100% of the surgical procedures. The mean surgery time found was 158.2 minutes. The bivariate analysis showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between the time of surgery and the surgical safety scores. It was evidenced a low adhesion of the surgical team to the safety procedures recommended by ANVISA. There was no correlation between the surgical time and the scores found. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37533 10.14393/BJ-v34n1a2018-37533 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37533 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v34n1a2018-37533 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37533/21471 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): Jan./Feb.; 214-222 Bioscience Journal ; v. 34 n. 1 (2018): Jan./Feb.; 214-222 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069077856911360 |