Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Avila Neto, Roberto Costa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Melo, Adriano Arrué, Ulguim, André da Rosa, Pedroso, Rafael Munhoz, Barbieri, Geovana Facco, Pigatto, Cassiano Salin, Luchese, Eric Fernandes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53578
Resumo: Synthetic auxin herbicides constitute major alternatives for managing tough-to-kill weeds such as Ipomoea spp. Adjuvant use is known to positively affect the biological efficacy of pesticides by modifying key spraying solution and droplet properties. Determining to what extent the use of adjuvants could change spray solution parameters and affect synthetic auxin herbicides’ efficiency for Ipomoea spp. control were the research goals. The study was conducted in two phases: laboratory and field, respectively. In the laboratory, the pH, the surface tension, and the resources of the herbicide drops were measured. In the field, weed control was evaluated. All adjuvants modified spray solution properties, lowering surface tension values. Most adjuvants decreased pH values as well as number and density of droplets due to an increase in droplet size. Regardless of adjuvant usage, Ipomoea spp. control levels rose more rapidly following 2,4-D spraying rather than dicamba, resulting in lower biomass accumulation when the former was used. Dicamba-containing treatments displayed slightly but significantly lower Ipomoea spp. control levels at the end of the evaluation period. Herbicide efficacy for Ipomoea spp. control was not improved upon the addition to the spray solution of any of the tested adjuvants. Adjuvant use altered spraying solution and droplet properties. 2,4-D spraying allowed for lower Ipomoea spp. biomass and greater control levels relative to dicamba, suggesting it might constitute a better option for Ipomoea spp. control. Even though herbicide efficacy was not improved with adjuvants, their use should still be considered given favorable spraying solution alterations, mainly with some alteration in droplet sizes despite the use of similar spray nozzles tips - maintaining weed control efficacy.
id UFU-14_6e246323de2dfc9f85b0fc9175027556
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/53578
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. controlAuxinMorninggloriespHSurface Tension.AgronomySynthetic auxin herbicides constitute major alternatives for managing tough-to-kill weeds such as Ipomoea spp. Adjuvant use is known to positively affect the biological efficacy of pesticides by modifying key spraying solution and droplet properties. Determining to what extent the use of adjuvants could change spray solution parameters and affect synthetic auxin herbicides’ efficiency for Ipomoea spp. control were the research goals. The study was conducted in two phases: laboratory and field, respectively. In the laboratory, the pH, the surface tension, and the resources of the herbicide drops were measured. In the field, weed control was evaluated. All adjuvants modified spray solution properties, lowering surface tension values. Most adjuvants decreased pH values as well as number and density of droplets due to an increase in droplet size. Regardless of adjuvant usage, Ipomoea spp. control levels rose more rapidly following 2,4-D spraying rather than dicamba, resulting in lower biomass accumulation when the former was used. Dicamba-containing treatments displayed slightly but significantly lower Ipomoea spp. control levels at the end of the evaluation period. Herbicide efficacy for Ipomoea spp. control was not improved upon the addition to the spray solution of any of the tested adjuvants. Adjuvant use altered spraying solution and droplet properties. 2,4-D spraying allowed for lower Ipomoea spp. biomass and greater control levels relative to dicamba, suggesting it might constitute a better option for Ipomoea spp. control. Even though herbicide efficacy was not improved with adjuvants, their use should still be considered given favorable spraying solution alterations, mainly with some alteration in droplet sizes despite the use of similar spray nozzles tips - maintaining weed control efficacy.EDUFU2020-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/5357810.14393/BJ-v36n0a2020-53578Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 (2020): Supplement1; 238-248Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 (2020): Supplement1; 238-2481981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53578/31208Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2020 Roberto Costa Avila Neto, Adriano Arrué Melo, André da Rosa Ulguim, Rafael Munhoz Pedroso, Geovana Facco Barbieri, Cassiano Salin Pigatto, Eric Fernandes Luchesehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvila Neto, Roberto Costa Melo, Adriano Arrué Ulguim, André da Rosa Pedroso, Rafael Munhoz Barbieri, Geovana Facco Pigatto, Cassiano Salin Luchese, Eric Fernandes 2022-05-26T17:57:38Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/53578Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-26T17:57:38Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control
title Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control
spellingShingle Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control
Avila Neto, Roberto Costa
Auxin
Morningglories
pH
Surface Tension.
Agronomy
title_short Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control
title_full Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control
title_fullStr Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control
title_sort Adjuvant interference on spray solution properties of 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides and their efficacy for Ipomoea SPP. control
author Avila Neto, Roberto Costa
author_facet Avila Neto, Roberto Costa
Melo, Adriano Arrué
Ulguim, André da Rosa
Pedroso, Rafael Munhoz
Barbieri, Geovana Facco
Pigatto, Cassiano Salin
Luchese, Eric Fernandes
author_role author
author2 Melo, Adriano Arrué
Ulguim, André da Rosa
Pedroso, Rafael Munhoz
Barbieri, Geovana Facco
Pigatto, Cassiano Salin
Luchese, Eric Fernandes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Avila Neto, Roberto Costa
Melo, Adriano Arrué
Ulguim, André da Rosa
Pedroso, Rafael Munhoz
Barbieri, Geovana Facco
Pigatto, Cassiano Salin
Luchese, Eric Fernandes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Auxin
Morningglories
pH
Surface Tension.
Agronomy
topic Auxin
Morningglories
pH
Surface Tension.
Agronomy
description Synthetic auxin herbicides constitute major alternatives for managing tough-to-kill weeds such as Ipomoea spp. Adjuvant use is known to positively affect the biological efficacy of pesticides by modifying key spraying solution and droplet properties. Determining to what extent the use of adjuvants could change spray solution parameters and affect synthetic auxin herbicides’ efficiency for Ipomoea spp. control were the research goals. The study was conducted in two phases: laboratory and field, respectively. In the laboratory, the pH, the surface tension, and the resources of the herbicide drops were measured. In the field, weed control was evaluated. All adjuvants modified spray solution properties, lowering surface tension values. Most adjuvants decreased pH values as well as number and density of droplets due to an increase in droplet size. Regardless of adjuvant usage, Ipomoea spp. control levels rose more rapidly following 2,4-D spraying rather than dicamba, resulting in lower biomass accumulation when the former was used. Dicamba-containing treatments displayed slightly but significantly lower Ipomoea spp. control levels at the end of the evaluation period. Herbicide efficacy for Ipomoea spp. control was not improved upon the addition to the spray solution of any of the tested adjuvants. Adjuvant use altered spraying solution and droplet properties. 2,4-D spraying allowed for lower Ipomoea spp. biomass and greater control levels relative to dicamba, suggesting it might constitute a better option for Ipomoea spp. control. Even though herbicide efficacy was not improved with adjuvants, their use should still be considered given favorable spraying solution alterations, mainly with some alteration in droplet sizes despite the use of similar spray nozzles tips - maintaining weed control efficacy.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53578
10.14393/BJ-v36n0a2020-53578
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53578
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n0a2020-53578
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/53578/31208
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 (2020): Supplement1; 238-248
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 (2020): Supplement1; 238-248
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069082395148288