Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248 |
Resumo: | The relationship of crops grown in rotation or in succession has increased every day and the use of antagonistic plants and/or non-host plants is one of the most efficient practices of integrated management of nematodes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) and millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ in reducing the population of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica and in increasing the productivity of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] when cultivated in succession. The experiment was conducted in an area cultivating okra (host culture) in rotation, with a history of severe infestation by phytonematoids. The experimental design involved randomized blocks with six treatments and four replicates, with the following treatments: T1, 15 kg.ha-1 of millet seeds; T2, 30 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T3, 10 kg.ha-1 of millet + 20 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T4, 20 kg.ha-1 of millet + 6 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T5, 6 kg.ha-1 of millet + 36 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; and T6, control. The nematode populations in the soil and roots were evaluated about 60 d after planting okra, and the yield was evaluated at the end of the crop cycle. Simple treatment with millet or crotalaria reduced the nematode population by 61% and 72%, respectively. The millet-crotalaria intercropping treatments reduced the nematode population by up to 85% compared with the control. In terms of productivity, there was an increase of 787 kg.ha-1 in the millet treatment and 2,109 kg.ha-1 in the intercropping treatments. Both the single cultivation of crotalaria or millet and the consortia of crotalaria and millet were effective in controlling the root-knot nematodes, and increased the productivity of okra. |
id |
UFU-14_7c34629524aeef7f239a72b4c0f1b709 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42248 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okraCrotalária e milheto como alternativas no controle de nematoides de galha infectando quiabeiroCrotalaria spectabilisIntercroppingCover cropGreen manureMeloidogynePennisetum glaucumAgricultural SciencesCrotalaria spectabilisMeloidogynePennisetum glaucumConsorciaçãoPlantas de coberturaAdubação verdeThe relationship of crops grown in rotation or in succession has increased every day and the use of antagonistic plants and/or non-host plants is one of the most efficient practices of integrated management of nematodes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) and millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ in reducing the population of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica and in increasing the productivity of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] when cultivated in succession. The experiment was conducted in an area cultivating okra (host culture) in rotation, with a history of severe infestation by phytonematoids. The experimental design involved randomized blocks with six treatments and four replicates, with the following treatments: T1, 15 kg.ha-1 of millet seeds; T2, 30 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T3, 10 kg.ha-1 of millet + 20 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T4, 20 kg.ha-1 of millet + 6 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T5, 6 kg.ha-1 of millet + 36 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; and T6, control. The nematode populations in the soil and roots were evaluated about 60 d after planting okra, and the yield was evaluated at the end of the crop cycle. Simple treatment with millet or crotalaria reduced the nematode population by 61% and 72%, respectively. The millet-crotalaria intercropping treatments reduced the nematode population by up to 85% compared with the control. In terms of productivity, there was an increase of 787 kg.ha-1 in the millet treatment and 2,109 kg.ha-1 in the intercropping treatments. Both the single cultivation of crotalaria or millet and the consortia of crotalaria and millet were effective in controlling the root-knot nematodes, and increased the productivity of okra.A relação de culturas cultivadas em sucessão rotação ou em sucessão tem aumentado a cada dia, e a utilização de plantas antagônicas e/ou plantas não hospedeiras é uma das práticas mais eficientes de manejo integrado de nematoides. O trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a eficiência do cultivo de crotalária (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) e milheto [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ no incremento de produtividade e redução populacional de Meloidogyne incognita e M. javanica em quiabeiro [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] cultivado em sucessão. O experimento foi conduzido em área de rotação com quiabeiro (cultura hospedeira), que tem histórico de grande infestação dos referidos fitonematoides. O delineamento experimental adotado foi o de blocos casualizados com seis tratamentos e quatro repetições, sendo T1 ₌ 15 kg.ha-1 de sementes de milheto, T2 ₌ 30 kg.ha-1 de crotalária, T3 ₌ 10 kg.ha-1 de milheto + 20 kg.ha-1 de crotalária, T4 ₌ 20 kg.ha-1 de milheto + 6 kg.ha-1 de crotalária, T5 ₌ 6 kg.ha-1 de milheto + 36 kg.ha-1 de crotalária e T6 ₌ Testemunha. Foram avaliadas as populações de nematoides no solo e nas raízes cerca de 60 dias após o plantio do quiabeiro e a produtividade ao final do cultivo. Os tratamentos milheto e crotalária solteiros reduziram a população de nematoides em 61 e 72%, respectivamente. Nos cultivos consorciados, obteve-se a redução de 85%, comparado com a testemunha. Quanto a produtividade, houve acréscimo de 787 kg.ha-1 no tratamento com milheto solteiro e de 2.109 kg.ha-1 nos tratamentos consorciados. Tanto o cultivo solteiro de crotalária e milheto, quanto seu uso em consórcio, efetivaram o controle dos nematoides de ganha e elevaram a produtividade do quiabeiro.EDUFU2020-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4224810.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-42248Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020): May/June; 713-719Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 3 (2020): Maio/Junho; 713-7191981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248/28613Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2020 Daniel Dalvan do Nascimento, Roberta Luiza Vidal, Anderson Alves Pimenta, Marilia Gregolin Costa, Pedro Luiz Martins Soareshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento, Daniel Dalvan doVidal, Roberta LuizaPimenta, Anderson AlvesCosta, Marilia GregolinSoares, Pedro Luiz Martins2022-06-14T18:37:11Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42248Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-06-14T18:37:11Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra Crotalária e milheto como alternativas no controle de nematoides de galha infectando quiabeiro |
title |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra |
spellingShingle |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do Crotalaria spectabilis Intercropping Cover crop Green manure Meloidogyne Pennisetum glaucum Agricultural Sciences Crotalaria spectabilis Meloidogyne Pennisetum glaucum Consorciação Plantas de cobertura Adubação verde |
title_short |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra |
title_full |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra |
title_fullStr |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra |
title_full_unstemmed |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra |
title_sort |
Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra |
author |
Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do |
author_facet |
Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do Vidal, Roberta Luiza Pimenta, Anderson Alves Costa, Marilia Gregolin Soares, Pedro Luiz Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vidal, Roberta Luiza Pimenta, Anderson Alves Costa, Marilia Gregolin Soares, Pedro Luiz Martins |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do Vidal, Roberta Luiza Pimenta, Anderson Alves Costa, Marilia Gregolin Soares, Pedro Luiz Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Crotalaria spectabilis Intercropping Cover crop Green manure Meloidogyne Pennisetum glaucum Agricultural Sciences Crotalaria spectabilis Meloidogyne Pennisetum glaucum Consorciação Plantas de cobertura Adubação verde |
topic |
Crotalaria spectabilis Intercropping Cover crop Green manure Meloidogyne Pennisetum glaucum Agricultural Sciences Crotalaria spectabilis Meloidogyne Pennisetum glaucum Consorciação Plantas de cobertura Adubação verde |
description |
The relationship of crops grown in rotation or in succession has increased every day and the use of antagonistic plants and/or non-host plants is one of the most efficient practices of integrated management of nematodes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) and millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ in reducing the population of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica and in increasing the productivity of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] when cultivated in succession. The experiment was conducted in an area cultivating okra (host culture) in rotation, with a history of severe infestation by phytonematoids. The experimental design involved randomized blocks with six treatments and four replicates, with the following treatments: T1, 15 kg.ha-1 of millet seeds; T2, 30 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T3, 10 kg.ha-1 of millet + 20 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T4, 20 kg.ha-1 of millet + 6 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T5, 6 kg.ha-1 of millet + 36 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; and T6, control. The nematode populations in the soil and roots were evaluated about 60 d after planting okra, and the yield was evaluated at the end of the crop cycle. Simple treatment with millet or crotalaria reduced the nematode population by 61% and 72%, respectively. The millet-crotalaria intercropping treatments reduced the nematode population by up to 85% compared with the control. In terms of productivity, there was an increase of 787 kg.ha-1 in the millet treatment and 2,109 kg.ha-1 in the intercropping treatments. Both the single cultivation of crotalaria or millet and the consortia of crotalaria and millet were effective in controlling the root-knot nematodes, and increased the productivity of okra. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248 10.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-42248 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-42248 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248/28613 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020): May/June; 713-719 Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 3 (2020): Maio/Junho; 713-719 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069080232984576 |