Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Vidal, Roberta Luiza, Pimenta, Anderson Alves, Costa, Marilia Gregolin, Soares, Pedro Luiz Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248
Resumo: The relationship of crops grown in rotation or in succession has increased every day and the use of antagonistic plants and/or non-host plants is one of the most efficient practices of integrated management of nematodes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) and millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ in reducing the population of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica and in increasing the productivity of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] when cultivated in succession. The experiment was conducted in an area cultivating okra (host culture) in rotation, with a history of severe infestation by phytonematoids. The experimental design involved randomized blocks with six treatments and four replicates, with the following treatments: T1, 15 kg.ha-1 of millet seeds; T2, 30 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T3, 10 kg.ha-1 of millet + 20 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T4, 20 kg.ha-1 of millet + 6 kg.ha-1  of crotalaria; T5, 6 kg.ha-1 of millet + 36 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; and T6, control. The nematode populations in the soil and roots were evaluated about 60 d after planting okra, and the yield was evaluated at the end of the crop cycle. Simple treatment with millet or crotalaria reduced the nematode population by 61% and 72%, respectively. The millet-crotalaria intercropping treatments reduced the nematode population by up to 85% compared with the control. In terms of productivity, there was an increase of 787 kg.ha-1 in the millet treatment and 2,109 kg.ha-1 in the intercropping treatments. Both the single cultivation of crotalaria or millet and the consortia of crotalaria and millet were effective in controlling the root-knot nematodes, and increased the productivity of okra.
id UFU-14_7c34629524aeef7f239a72b4c0f1b709
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42248
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okraCrotalária e milheto como alternativas no controle de nematoides de galha infectando quiabeiroCrotalaria spectabilisIntercroppingCover cropGreen manureMeloidogynePennisetum glaucumAgricultural SciencesCrotalaria spectabilisMeloidogynePennisetum glaucumConsorciaçãoPlantas de coberturaAdubação verdeThe relationship of crops grown in rotation or in succession has increased every day and the use of antagonistic plants and/or non-host plants is one of the most efficient practices of integrated management of nematodes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) and millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ in reducing the population of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica and in increasing the productivity of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] when cultivated in succession. The experiment was conducted in an area cultivating okra (host culture) in rotation, with a history of severe infestation by phytonematoids. The experimental design involved randomized blocks with six treatments and four replicates, with the following treatments: T1, 15 kg.ha-1 of millet seeds; T2, 30 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T3, 10 kg.ha-1 of millet + 20 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T4, 20 kg.ha-1 of millet + 6 kg.ha-1  of crotalaria; T5, 6 kg.ha-1 of millet + 36 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; and T6, control. The nematode populations in the soil and roots were evaluated about 60 d after planting okra, and the yield was evaluated at the end of the crop cycle. Simple treatment with millet or crotalaria reduced the nematode population by 61% and 72%, respectively. The millet-crotalaria intercropping treatments reduced the nematode population by up to 85% compared with the control. In terms of productivity, there was an increase of 787 kg.ha-1 in the millet treatment and 2,109 kg.ha-1 in the intercropping treatments. Both the single cultivation of crotalaria or millet and the consortia of crotalaria and millet were effective in controlling the root-knot nematodes, and increased the productivity of okra.A relação de culturas cultivadas em sucessão rotação ou em sucessão tem aumentado a cada dia, e a utilização de plantas antagônicas e/ou plantas não hospedeiras é uma das práticas mais eficientes de manejo integrado de nematoides. O trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a eficiência do cultivo de crotalária (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) e milheto [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ no incremento de produtividade e redução populacional de Meloidogyne incognita e M. javanica em quiabeiro [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] cultivado em sucessão. O experimento foi conduzido em área de rotação com quiabeiro (cultura hospedeira), que tem histórico de grande infestação dos referidos fitonematoides. O delineamento experimental adotado foi o de blocos casualizados com seis tratamentos e quatro repetições, sendo T1 ₌ 15 kg.ha-1 de sementes de milheto, T2 ₌ 30 kg.ha-1 de crotalária, T3 ₌ 10 kg.ha-1 de milheto + 20 kg.ha-1 de crotalária, T4 ₌ 20 kg.ha-1 de milheto + 6 kg.ha-1 de crotalária, T5 ₌ 6 kg.ha-1 de milheto + 36 kg.ha-1 de crotalária e T6 ₌ Testemunha. Foram avaliadas as populações de nematoides no solo e nas raízes cerca de 60 dias após o plantio do quiabeiro e a produtividade ao final do cultivo. Os tratamentos milheto e crotalária solteiros reduziram a população de nematoides em 61 e 72%, respectivamente. Nos cultivos consorciados, obteve-se a redução de 85%, comparado com a testemunha.  Quanto a produtividade, houve acréscimo de 787 kg.ha-1 no tratamento com milheto solteiro e de 2.109 kg.ha-1 nos tratamentos consorciados.  Tanto o cultivo solteiro de crotalária e milheto, quanto seu uso em consórcio, efetivaram o controle dos nematoides de ganha e elevaram a produtividade do quiabeiro.EDUFU2020-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4224810.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-42248Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020): May/June; 713-719Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 3 (2020): Maio/Junho; 713-7191981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248/28613Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2020 Daniel Dalvan do Nascimento, Roberta Luiza Vidal, Anderson Alves Pimenta, Marilia Gregolin Costa, Pedro Luiz Martins Soareshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento, Daniel Dalvan doVidal, Roberta LuizaPimenta, Anderson AlvesCosta, Marilia GregolinSoares, Pedro Luiz Martins2022-06-14T18:37:11Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42248Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-06-14T18:37:11Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
Crotalária e milheto como alternativas no controle de nematoides de galha infectando quiabeiro
title Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
spellingShingle Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do
Crotalaria spectabilis
Intercropping
Cover crop
Green manure
Meloidogyne
Pennisetum glaucum
Agricultural Sciences
Crotalaria spectabilis
Meloidogyne
Pennisetum glaucum
Consorciação
Plantas de cobertura
Adubação verde
title_short Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
title_full Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
title_fullStr Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
title_full_unstemmed Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
title_sort Crotalaria and millet as alternative controls of root-knot nematodes infecting okra
author Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do
author_facet Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do
Vidal, Roberta Luiza
Pimenta, Anderson Alves
Costa, Marilia Gregolin
Soares, Pedro Luiz Martins
author_role author
author2 Vidal, Roberta Luiza
Pimenta, Anderson Alves
Costa, Marilia Gregolin
Soares, Pedro Luiz Martins
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nascimento, Daniel Dalvan do
Vidal, Roberta Luiza
Pimenta, Anderson Alves
Costa, Marilia Gregolin
Soares, Pedro Luiz Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Crotalaria spectabilis
Intercropping
Cover crop
Green manure
Meloidogyne
Pennisetum glaucum
Agricultural Sciences
Crotalaria spectabilis
Meloidogyne
Pennisetum glaucum
Consorciação
Plantas de cobertura
Adubação verde
topic Crotalaria spectabilis
Intercropping
Cover crop
Green manure
Meloidogyne
Pennisetum glaucum
Agricultural Sciences
Crotalaria spectabilis
Meloidogyne
Pennisetum glaucum
Consorciação
Plantas de cobertura
Adubação verde
description The relationship of crops grown in rotation or in succession has increased every day and the use of antagonistic plants and/or non-host plants is one of the most efficient practices of integrated management of nematodes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth) and millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Leeke] ‘ADR 300’ in reducing the population of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica and in increasing the productivity of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] when cultivated in succession. The experiment was conducted in an area cultivating okra (host culture) in rotation, with a history of severe infestation by phytonematoids. The experimental design involved randomized blocks with six treatments and four replicates, with the following treatments: T1, 15 kg.ha-1 of millet seeds; T2, 30 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T3, 10 kg.ha-1 of millet + 20 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; T4, 20 kg.ha-1 of millet + 6 kg.ha-1  of crotalaria; T5, 6 kg.ha-1 of millet + 36 kg.ha-1 of crotalaria; and T6, control. The nematode populations in the soil and roots were evaluated about 60 d after planting okra, and the yield was evaluated at the end of the crop cycle. Simple treatment with millet or crotalaria reduced the nematode population by 61% and 72%, respectively. The millet-crotalaria intercropping treatments reduced the nematode population by up to 85% compared with the control. In terms of productivity, there was an increase of 787 kg.ha-1 in the millet treatment and 2,109 kg.ha-1 in the intercropping treatments. Both the single cultivation of crotalaria or millet and the consortia of crotalaria and millet were effective in controlling the root-knot nematodes, and increased the productivity of okra.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248
10.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-42248
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-42248
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42248/28613
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020): May/June; 713-719
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 3 (2020): Maio/Junho; 713-719
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069080232984576