Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365 |
Resumo: | White mold caused by the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is an important disease in relation to soybean. The use of less susceptible genotypes can be a productive strategy in the management of this disease, and the development of an appropriate methodology for soybean inoculation is useful for the differentiation of disease-resistant genotypes. The present study aimed to assess the susceptibility of 77 soybean genotypes based on their reaction to oxalic acid, as well as to determine correlations between three traditional disease assay methods (detached leaf, non-wounded stem and straw tests) and the results of the oxalic acid assay. Oxalic acid susceptibility was assessed by using a wilting score scale. For the other methods, the severity of disease symptoms was assessed. To compare methodologies, the values obtained for the genotypes using each method were categorized into classes, and a severity index was used to represent individuals within each class. All the methods used were efficient for the differentiation of soybean genotypes in terms of susceptibility to S. sclerotiorum; however, the behavior of the genotypes depended on the inoculation method adopted. Even though no significant relationship was identified between the severities of the damage resulting from the methodologies, the rankings acquired from the methods strongly agreed. The oxalic acid method was the most rapid, the least laborious, and was the cheapest compared with the other methods that were used. |
id |
UFU-14_a0313b1f8fef315c57f6276b3ac952b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31365 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold Glycine maxPathogenResistanceSclerotinia sclerotiorumAgricultural SciencesWhite mold caused by the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is an important disease in relation to soybean. The use of less susceptible genotypes can be a productive strategy in the management of this disease, and the development of an appropriate methodology for soybean inoculation is useful for the differentiation of disease-resistant genotypes. The present study aimed to assess the susceptibility of 77 soybean genotypes based on their reaction to oxalic acid, as well as to determine correlations between three traditional disease assay methods (detached leaf, non-wounded stem and straw tests) and the results of the oxalic acid assay. Oxalic acid susceptibility was assessed by using a wilting score scale. For the other methods, the severity of disease symptoms was assessed. To compare methodologies, the values obtained for the genotypes using each method were categorized into classes, and a severity index was used to represent individuals within each class. All the methods used were efficient for the differentiation of soybean genotypes in terms of susceptibility to S. sclerotiorum; however, the behavior of the genotypes depended on the inoculation method adopted. Even though no significant relationship was identified between the severities of the damage resulting from the methodologies, the rankings acquired from the methods strongly agreed. The oxalic acid method was the most rapid, the least laborious, and was the cheapest compared with the other methods that were used.EDUFU2016-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3136510.14393/BJ-v32n2a2016-31365Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Mar./Apr.; 389-402Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 2 (2016): Mar./Apr.; 389-4021981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365/18125Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Guilherme de Camargo Huller, David de Souza Jaccoud Filho, Marcelo Luiz Cunha Pierre, Hamilton Edemundo Tullio, Edilaine Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Fernando Cezar Juliattihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Camargo Huller, Guilhermede Souza Jaccoud Filho, DavidLuiz Cunha Pierre, MarceloEdemundo Tullio, HamiltonMaurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, EdilaineCezar Juliatti, Fernando2022-05-18T15:28:03Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31365Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-18T15:28:03Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold |
title |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold |
spellingShingle |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold de Camargo Huller, Guilherme Glycine max Pathogen Resistance Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold |
title_full |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold |
title_fullStr |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold |
title_sort |
Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold |
author |
de Camargo Huller, Guilherme |
author_facet |
de Camargo Huller, Guilherme de Souza Jaccoud Filho, David Luiz Cunha Pierre, Marcelo Edemundo Tullio, Hamilton Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Edilaine Cezar Juliatti, Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Souza Jaccoud Filho, David Luiz Cunha Pierre, Marcelo Edemundo Tullio, Hamilton Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Edilaine Cezar Juliatti, Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Camargo Huller, Guilherme de Souza Jaccoud Filho, David Luiz Cunha Pierre, Marcelo Edemundo Tullio, Hamilton Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Edilaine Cezar Juliatti, Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Glycine max Pathogen Resistance Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Glycine max Pathogen Resistance Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Agricultural Sciences |
description |
White mold caused by the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is an important disease in relation to soybean. The use of less susceptible genotypes can be a productive strategy in the management of this disease, and the development of an appropriate methodology for soybean inoculation is useful for the differentiation of disease-resistant genotypes. The present study aimed to assess the susceptibility of 77 soybean genotypes based on their reaction to oxalic acid, as well as to determine correlations between three traditional disease assay methods (detached leaf, non-wounded stem and straw tests) and the results of the oxalic acid assay. Oxalic acid susceptibility was assessed by using a wilting score scale. For the other methods, the severity of disease symptoms was assessed. To compare methodologies, the values obtained for the genotypes using each method were categorized into classes, and a severity index was used to represent individuals within each class. All the methods used were efficient for the differentiation of soybean genotypes in terms of susceptibility to S. sclerotiorum; however, the behavior of the genotypes depended on the inoculation method adopted. Even though no significant relationship was identified between the severities of the damage resulting from the methodologies, the rankings acquired from the methods strongly agreed. The oxalic acid method was the most rapid, the least laborious, and was the cheapest compared with the other methods that were used. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365 10.14393/BJ-v32n2a2016-31365 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v32n2a2016-31365 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365/18125 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Mar./Apr.; 389-402 Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 2 (2016): Mar./Apr.; 389-402 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069075929628672 |