Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Camargo Huller, Guilherme
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: de Souza Jaccoud Filho, David, Luiz Cunha Pierre, Marcelo, Edemundo Tullio, Hamilton, Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Edilaine, Cezar Juliatti, Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365
Resumo: White mold caused by the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is an important disease in relation to soybean. The use of less susceptible genotypes can be a productive strategy in the management of this disease, and the development of an appropriate methodology for soybean inoculation is useful for the differentiation of disease-resistant genotypes. The present study aimed to assess the susceptibility of 77 soybean genotypes based on their reaction to oxalic acid, as well as to determine correlations between three traditional disease assay methods (detached leaf, non-wounded stem and straw tests) and the results of the oxalic acid assay. Oxalic acid susceptibility was assessed by using a wilting score scale. For the other methods, the severity of disease symptoms was assessed. To compare methodologies, the values obtained for the genotypes using each method were categorized into classes, and a severity index was used to represent individuals within each class. All the methods used were efficient for the differentiation of soybean genotypes in terms of susceptibility to S. sclerotiorum; however, the behavior of the genotypes depended on the inoculation method adopted. Even though no significant relationship was identified between the severities of the damage resulting from the methodologies, the rankings acquired from the methods strongly agreed. The oxalic acid method was the most rapid, the least laborious, and was the cheapest compared with the other methods that were used.
id UFU-14_a0313b1f8fef315c57f6276b3ac952b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31365
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold Glycine maxPathogenResistanceSclerotinia sclerotiorumAgricultural SciencesWhite mold caused by the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is an important disease in relation to soybean. The use of less susceptible genotypes can be a productive strategy in the management of this disease, and the development of an appropriate methodology for soybean inoculation is useful for the differentiation of disease-resistant genotypes. The present study aimed to assess the susceptibility of 77 soybean genotypes based on their reaction to oxalic acid, as well as to determine correlations between three traditional disease assay methods (detached leaf, non-wounded stem and straw tests) and the results of the oxalic acid assay. Oxalic acid susceptibility was assessed by using a wilting score scale. For the other methods, the severity of disease symptoms was assessed. To compare methodologies, the values obtained for the genotypes using each method were categorized into classes, and a severity index was used to represent individuals within each class. All the methods used were efficient for the differentiation of soybean genotypes in terms of susceptibility to S. sclerotiorum; however, the behavior of the genotypes depended on the inoculation method adopted. Even though no significant relationship was identified between the severities of the damage resulting from the methodologies, the rankings acquired from the methods strongly agreed. The oxalic acid method was the most rapid, the least laborious, and was the cheapest compared with the other methods that were used.EDUFU2016-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3136510.14393/BJ-v32n2a2016-31365Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Mar./Apr.; 389-402Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 2 (2016): Mar./Apr.; 389-4021981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365/18125Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Guilherme de Camargo Huller, David de Souza Jaccoud Filho, Marcelo Luiz Cunha Pierre, Hamilton Edemundo Tullio, Edilaine Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Fernando Cezar Juliattihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Camargo Huller, Guilhermede Souza Jaccoud Filho, DavidLuiz Cunha Pierre, MarceloEdemundo Tullio, HamiltonMaurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, EdilaineCezar Juliatti, Fernando2022-05-18T15:28:03Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31365Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-18T15:28:03Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
title Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
spellingShingle Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
de Camargo Huller, Guilherme
Glycine max
Pathogen
Resistance
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
title_full Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
title_fullStr Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
title_full_unstemmed Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
title_sort Different methods of assessing susceptibility of soybean genotypes to white mold
author de Camargo Huller, Guilherme
author_facet de Camargo Huller, Guilherme
de Souza Jaccoud Filho, David
Luiz Cunha Pierre, Marcelo
Edemundo Tullio, Hamilton
Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Edilaine
Cezar Juliatti, Fernando
author_role author
author2 de Souza Jaccoud Filho, David
Luiz Cunha Pierre, Marcelo
Edemundo Tullio, Hamilton
Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Edilaine
Cezar Juliatti, Fernando
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Camargo Huller, Guilherme
de Souza Jaccoud Filho, David
Luiz Cunha Pierre, Marcelo
Edemundo Tullio, Hamilton
Maurícia Gelinski Grabicoski, Edilaine
Cezar Juliatti, Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max
Pathogen
Resistance
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Agricultural Sciences
topic Glycine max
Pathogen
Resistance
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Agricultural Sciences
description White mold caused by the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is an important disease in relation to soybean. The use of less susceptible genotypes can be a productive strategy in the management of this disease, and the development of an appropriate methodology for soybean inoculation is useful for the differentiation of disease-resistant genotypes. The present study aimed to assess the susceptibility of 77 soybean genotypes based on their reaction to oxalic acid, as well as to determine correlations between three traditional disease assay methods (detached leaf, non-wounded stem and straw tests) and the results of the oxalic acid assay. Oxalic acid susceptibility was assessed by using a wilting score scale. For the other methods, the severity of disease symptoms was assessed. To compare methodologies, the values obtained for the genotypes using each method were categorized into classes, and a severity index was used to represent individuals within each class. All the methods used were efficient for the differentiation of soybean genotypes in terms of susceptibility to S. sclerotiorum; however, the behavior of the genotypes depended on the inoculation method adopted. Even though no significant relationship was identified between the severities of the damage resulting from the methodologies, the rankings acquired from the methods strongly agreed. The oxalic acid method was the most rapid, the least laborious, and was the cheapest compared with the other methods that were used.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365
10.14393/BJ-v32n2a2016-31365
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v32n2a2016-31365
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/31365/18125
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Mar./Apr.; 389-402
Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 2 (2016): Mar./Apr.; 389-402
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069075929628672