Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Vanderley José
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Asmar, Simone Abreu, Biase, Nádia Giaretta, Luz, José Magno Queiroz, Melo, Berildo de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/38778
Resumo: Statistical analyses are an essential part of scientific research. Various procedures since the preparation of the experiment have an impact on the statistical procedures adopted. Therefore, a correct planning implies a precise analysis. Through sampling which used a reliability interval at 95% and error margin at 7%, this study aimed to characterize the statistics used by researchers in the field of plant tissue culture, and based on the results, discuss the main impacts of their misuse. Information regarding sample size; number of repetitions; delineation; scheme adopted (factorial or otherwise) and number of treatments; use (or lack of) data transformation; type of the variable (quantitative or qualitative), test and regression types was quantified. Even with consistent use of statistics in plant tissue culture experiments some hindrances remain, such as the size of the portions and the reduced number of repetitions. Added to this, the transformation of data in which criteria for adoption is not reported or informed, or use of ill-informed criteria. Even considering homogeneous conditions, neglecting to use blocking in experiments may misguide researchers. Blocking is recommended to increase the size of the sample, with time as blocking factor, or the human factor involved in the installation of the experiment. The use of factorial designs has been characteristic of the area, which aims to define doses and plant regulators, so the experiments present large number of treatments. For comparison, Tukey's is used for qualitative data, and for the quantitative, and quadratic linear models are preferred.
id UFU-14_a05817feb399847f27a5f65d597d9327
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/38778
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use Estatísticas aplicadas a micropropagação de plantas: uma revisão crítica sobre usos inadequadosExperimental designsPlant biotechnologyIn vitro experimental planningAgricultural SciencesStatistical analyses are an essential part of scientific research. Various procedures since the preparation of the experiment have an impact on the statistical procedures adopted. Therefore, a correct planning implies a precise analysis. Through sampling which used a reliability interval at 95% and error margin at 7%, this study aimed to characterize the statistics used by researchers in the field of plant tissue culture, and based on the results, discuss the main impacts of their misuse. Information regarding sample size; number of repetitions; delineation; scheme adopted (factorial or otherwise) and number of treatments; use (or lack of) data transformation; type of the variable (quantitative or qualitative), test and regression types was quantified. Even with consistent use of statistics in plant tissue culture experiments some hindrances remain, such as the size of the portions and the reduced number of repetitions. Added to this, the transformation of data in which criteria for adoption is not reported or informed, or use of ill-informed criteria. Even considering homogeneous conditions, neglecting to use blocking in experiments may misguide researchers. Blocking is recommended to increase the size of the sample, with time as blocking factor, or the human factor involved in the installation of the experiment. The use of factorial designs has been characteristic of the area, which aims to define doses and plant regulators, so the experiments present large number of treatments. For comparison, Tukey's is used for qualitative data, and for the quantitative, and quadratic linear models are preferred.As análises estatísticas são uma parte essencial da pesquisa científica. Vários procedimentos desde a elaboração do experimento têm impacto nos procedimentos estatísticos finais adotados, assim um correto planejamento implica em uma análise precisa. Por meio de uma amostragem utilizando intervalo de confiança a 95% e margem de erro de 7% objetivou caracterizar as estatísticas utilizadas pelos pesquisadores da área de cultura de tecidos vegetais, e com base nos resultados discutir os principais impactos do mau uso. Foram quantificadas as informações referentes ao tamanho da amostra; número de repetições; delineamento; esquema adotado (fatorial ou não) e número de tratamentos; uso ou não de transformação, critério para adoção e tipo de transformação; tipo da variável (quantitativo ou qualitativo), teste e tipos de regressão. Mesmo com uso consistente da estatística nos experimentos de micropropagação alguns argalospermanecem, como o tamanho das parcelas e o número reduzido de repetições. Soma-se a isto, a transformação de dados na qual não são informados os critérios para a adoção, ou usam-se critérios equivocados. Mesmo considerando as condições homogêneas, o não uso da blocagem nos experimentos pode configurar em um erro. Recomenda-se a blocagem para aumentar o tamanho da amostra, tendo como bloco o tempo e, ou, o fator humano envolvido na instalação do experimento. Como característica da área tem-se o uso de experimentos fatoriais, visando definir doses e reguladores vegetais, assim os experimentos apresentam grande número de tratamentos. Para comparação dos dados qualitativos utiliza-se o teste de Tukey e no quantitativo as regressões preferidas são as lineares e quadráticas.EDUFU2018-10-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3877810.14393/BJ-v34n5a2018-38778Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 34 No. 5 (2018): Sept./Oct.; 1308-1318Bioscience Journal ; v. 34 n. 5 (2018): Sept./Oct.; 1308-13181981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/38778/24226Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2018 Vanderley José Pereira, Simone Abreu Asmar, Nádia Giaretta Biase, José Magno Queiroz Luz, Berildo de Melohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Vanderley JoséAsmar, Simone AbreuBiase, Nádia GiarettaLuz, José Magno QueirozMelo, Berildo de2022-02-10T13:00:47Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/38778Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-10T13:00:47Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use
Estatísticas aplicadas a micropropagação de plantas: uma revisão crítica sobre usos inadequados
title Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use
spellingShingle Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use
Pereira, Vanderley José
Experimental designs
Plant biotechnology
In vitro experimental planning
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use
title_full Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use
title_fullStr Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use
title_full_unstemmed Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use
title_sort Statistics applied to plant micropropagation: a critical review of inadequate use
author Pereira, Vanderley José
author_facet Pereira, Vanderley José
Asmar, Simone Abreu
Biase, Nádia Giaretta
Luz, José Magno Queiroz
Melo, Berildo de
author_role author
author2 Asmar, Simone Abreu
Biase, Nádia Giaretta
Luz, José Magno Queiroz
Melo, Berildo de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Vanderley José
Asmar, Simone Abreu
Biase, Nádia Giaretta
Luz, José Magno Queiroz
Melo, Berildo de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Experimental designs
Plant biotechnology
In vitro experimental planning
Agricultural Sciences
topic Experimental designs
Plant biotechnology
In vitro experimental planning
Agricultural Sciences
description Statistical analyses are an essential part of scientific research. Various procedures since the preparation of the experiment have an impact on the statistical procedures adopted. Therefore, a correct planning implies a precise analysis. Through sampling which used a reliability interval at 95% and error margin at 7%, this study aimed to characterize the statistics used by researchers in the field of plant tissue culture, and based on the results, discuss the main impacts of their misuse. Information regarding sample size; number of repetitions; delineation; scheme adopted (factorial or otherwise) and number of treatments; use (or lack of) data transformation; type of the variable (quantitative or qualitative), test and regression types was quantified. Even with consistent use of statistics in plant tissue culture experiments some hindrances remain, such as the size of the portions and the reduced number of repetitions. Added to this, the transformation of data in which criteria for adoption is not reported or informed, or use of ill-informed criteria. Even considering homogeneous conditions, neglecting to use blocking in experiments may misguide researchers. Blocking is recommended to increase the size of the sample, with time as blocking factor, or the human factor involved in the installation of the experiment. The use of factorial designs has been characteristic of the area, which aims to define doses and plant regulators, so the experiments present large number of treatments. For comparison, Tukey's is used for qualitative data, and for the quantitative, and quadratic linear models are preferred.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/38778
10.14393/BJ-v34n5a2018-38778
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/38778
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v34n5a2018-38778
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/38778/24226
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 34 No. 5 (2018): Sept./Oct.; 1308-1318
Bioscience Journal ; v. 34 n. 5 (2018): Sept./Oct.; 1308-1318
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069078317236224