Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/56358 |
Resumo: | It is believed that indaziflam gives a longer period of weed control compared to clomazone, irrespective of the type or texture of the soil. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate pre-emergent control in five problematic weed species of family Poaceae to sugarcane, using the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone in two soils of different textures. Two experiments were carried out, one in a soil of a sandy-loam texture and the other in a clayey soil. For both experiments, a randomised block design of split plots was chosen, with four replications. The treatments consisted of the herbicides indaziflam (75 and 100 g ai ha-1), clomazone (1080 g ai ha-1) and a control with no herbicide. In the subplots, the treatments were Digitaria horizontalis, Panicum maximum, Rottboellia cochinchinensis, Urochloa decumbens and Urochloa plantaginea. Both herbicides were more effective in the clayey soil, but with indaziflam (100 g ai ha-1), more than 90% control of the weeds remained after 240 days after application (DAA), whereas for clomazone, control remained only up to 90 DAA. The herbicide clomazone did not satisfactorily control the weeds in the sandy-loam soil. The herbicide indaziflam did not control U. decumbens in the sandy-loam soil. D. horizontalis and R. cochinchinensis were the most sensitive species to the herbicide indaziflam, irrespective of soil texture. |
id |
UFU-14_a2435c66a8cf757f673c196535972631 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/56358 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane cropEFICÁCIA DOS HERBICIDAS INDAZIFLAM E CLOMAZONE SOBRE PROBLEMÁTICAS PLANTAS DANINHAS DA FAMÍLIA POACEAE, PARA A CULTURA DA CANA-DE-AÇÚCARChemical controlDigitalis horizontalisPanicum maximumRottboellia cochinchinensisUrochloa spp. Agricultural SciencesIt is believed that indaziflam gives a longer period of weed control compared to clomazone, irrespective of the type or texture of the soil. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate pre-emergent control in five problematic weed species of family Poaceae to sugarcane, using the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone in two soils of different textures. Two experiments were carried out, one in a soil of a sandy-loam texture and the other in a clayey soil. For both experiments, a randomised block design of split plots was chosen, with four replications. The treatments consisted of the herbicides indaziflam (75 and 100 g ai ha-1), clomazone (1080 g ai ha-1) and a control with no herbicide. In the subplots, the treatments were Digitaria horizontalis, Panicum maximum, Rottboellia cochinchinensis, Urochloa decumbens and Urochloa plantaginea. Both herbicides were more effective in the clayey soil, but with indaziflam (100 g ai ha-1), more than 90% control of the weeds remained after 240 days after application (DAA), whereas for clomazone, control remained only up to 90 DAA. The herbicide clomazone did not satisfactorily control the weeds in the sandy-loam soil. The herbicide indaziflam did not control U. decumbens in the sandy-loam soil. D. horizontalis and R. cochinchinensis were the most sensitive species to the herbicide indaziflam, irrespective of soil texture.Acredita-se que o indaziflam proporcione um período mais longo de controle de plantas daninhas em comparação com o clomazone, independentemente do tipo ou textura do solo. Assim, objetivou-se com este trabalho avaliar o controle em pré-emergência de cinco espécies de plantas daninhas da família Poaceae, problemáticas para de cana-de-açúcar, com os herbicidas indaziflam e clomazone em dois solos de texturas distintas. Foram realizados dois experimentos, um em solo de textura franco-arenosa e outro em textura argilosa. Para ambos os experimentos, o delineamento escolhido foi o de blocos ao acaso, em esquema de parcelas subdivididas, com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram compostos pelos herbicidas indaziflam (75 g ia ha-1 e 100 g ia ha-1), clomazone (1080 g ia ha-1) e uma testemunha sem aplicação. Nas subparcelas os tratamentos foram as espécies, Digitaria horizontalis, Panicum maximum, Rottboellia cochinchinensis, Urochloa decumbens e Urochloa plantaginea. Os dois herbicidas foram mais eficazes em solo de textura argilosa, mas com indaziflam (100 g ia ha-1) o controle acima de 90% das plantas daninhas permanece até 240 DAA, enquanto com clomazone apenas aos 90 DAA. O herbicida clomazone não controlou satisfatoriamente as plantas daninhas no solo de textura franco-arenosa. O herbicida indaziflam não controlou a espécie U. decumbens em solo de textura franco-arenosa. D. horizontalis e R. cochinchinensis foram às espécies mais sensíveis ao herbicida indaziflam, independentemente da textura do solo.EDUFU2022-08-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/5635810.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-56358Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 38 (2022): Continuous Publication; e38070Bioscience Journal ; v. 38 (2022): Continuous Publication; e380701981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/56358/34501Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2022 Giovani Apolari Ghirardello, Lucas da Silva Araújo, Gustavo Soares da Silva, André Felipe Moreira Silva, Luiz Henrique Franco de Campos, Ricardo Victoria Filhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGhirardello, Giovani ApolariAraújo, Lucas da SilvaSilva, Gustavo Soares daSilva, André Felipe MoreiraCampos, Luiz Henrique Franco deVictoria Filho, Ricardo2022-09-23T14:36:37Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/56358Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-09-23T14:36:37Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop EFICÁCIA DOS HERBICIDAS INDAZIFLAM E CLOMAZONE SOBRE PROBLEMÁTICAS PLANTAS DANINHAS DA FAMÍLIA POACEAE, PARA A CULTURA DA CANA-DE-AÇÚCAR |
title |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop Ghirardello, Giovani Apolari Chemical control Digitalis horizontalis Panicum maximum Rottboellia cochinchinensis Urochloa spp. Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop |
title_full |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop |
title_sort |
Efficacy of the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone on problematic weeds of family poaceae to sugarcane crop |
author |
Ghirardello, Giovani Apolari |
author_facet |
Ghirardello, Giovani Apolari Araújo, Lucas da Silva Silva, Gustavo Soares da Silva, André Felipe Moreira Campos, Luiz Henrique Franco de Victoria Filho, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Araújo, Lucas da Silva Silva, Gustavo Soares da Silva, André Felipe Moreira Campos, Luiz Henrique Franco de Victoria Filho, Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ghirardello, Giovani Apolari Araújo, Lucas da Silva Silva, Gustavo Soares da Silva, André Felipe Moreira Campos, Luiz Henrique Franco de Victoria Filho, Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chemical control Digitalis horizontalis Panicum maximum Rottboellia cochinchinensis Urochloa spp. Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Chemical control Digitalis horizontalis Panicum maximum Rottboellia cochinchinensis Urochloa spp. Agricultural Sciences |
description |
It is believed that indaziflam gives a longer period of weed control compared to clomazone, irrespective of the type or texture of the soil. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate pre-emergent control in five problematic weed species of family Poaceae to sugarcane, using the herbicides indaziflam and clomazone in two soils of different textures. Two experiments were carried out, one in a soil of a sandy-loam texture and the other in a clayey soil. For both experiments, a randomised block design of split plots was chosen, with four replications. The treatments consisted of the herbicides indaziflam (75 and 100 g ai ha-1), clomazone (1080 g ai ha-1) and a control with no herbicide. In the subplots, the treatments were Digitaria horizontalis, Panicum maximum, Rottboellia cochinchinensis, Urochloa decumbens and Urochloa plantaginea. Both herbicides were more effective in the clayey soil, but with indaziflam (100 g ai ha-1), more than 90% control of the weeds remained after 240 days after application (DAA), whereas for clomazone, control remained only up to 90 DAA. The herbicide clomazone did not satisfactorily control the weeds in the sandy-loam soil. The herbicide indaziflam did not control U. decumbens in the sandy-loam soil. D. horizontalis and R. cochinchinensis were the most sensitive species to the herbicide indaziflam, irrespective of soil texture. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/56358 10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-56358 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/56358 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-56358 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/56358/34501 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 38 (2022): Continuous Publication; e38070 Bioscience Journal ; v. 38 (2022): Continuous Publication; e38070 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069082941456384 |