A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hummes, Ana Paula
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Novakowiski, Jaqueline Huzar, Carvalho, Ivan Ricardo, Bortoluzzi, Edson Campanhola
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/63637
Resumo: Monoculture for timber production has been replacing natural environments as the demand for renewable energy sources increases. The lack of nutrient compensation may increase the risk of soil depletion, thus changing soil properties. To summarize the impact of forestry activities in edaphic environments, we present a meta-analysis on the rhizosphere effects of coniferous and broadleaved trees established as monoculture and natural regeneration on soil physicochemical properties. Records of soil attributes published in peer-reviewed journals from eight countries were collected. Clay content changed only in monoculture sites, decreasing 55.51% in the rhizosphere, while silt and sand presented significant variations in both monoculture and naturally regenerated areas. Conifers affected the soil more than broadleaved trees, evidenced by higher pH reduction (-2.96% vs. -1.98%) and higher increase of Al3+ (197.43% vs. 50.68%), K+ (80.40% vs. 69.90%), CEC (24.61% vs. 17.35%), and total organic carbon (82.21% vs. 69.89%). Also, the rhizosphere affected regeneration soils more than monoculture, indicated by higher Al3+ (50.68% vs. ns) and available P (32.31% vs. ns), K+ (203.44% vs. ns), CEC (34.90% vs. 20.93), and total organic carbon (91.55% vs. 63.23%). These results indicate higher nutrient availability in naturally regenerated than monoculture sites, as higher species diversity and better plant litter quality are expected. This meta-analysis shows that coniferous and naturally regenerated trees had a higher influence on the rhizosphere and soil properties than broadleaved and monocultures. Management practices must be revisited to ensure the long-term sustainability of forestry activity, and studies in tropical zones must be intensified.
id UFU-14_abeb56a4374c347d89a0514008b96468
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/63637
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlandsBroadleafConiferousMonocultureRegenerationRhizosphere. Agricultural SciencesMonoculture for timber production has been replacing natural environments as the demand for renewable energy sources increases. The lack of nutrient compensation may increase the risk of soil depletion, thus changing soil properties. To summarize the impact of forestry activities in edaphic environments, we present a meta-analysis on the rhizosphere effects of coniferous and broadleaved trees established as monoculture and natural regeneration on soil physicochemical properties. Records of soil attributes published in peer-reviewed journals from eight countries were collected. Clay content changed only in monoculture sites, decreasing 55.51% in the rhizosphere, while silt and sand presented significant variations in both monoculture and naturally regenerated areas. Conifers affected the soil more than broadleaved trees, evidenced by higher pH reduction (-2.96% vs. -1.98%) and higher increase of Al3+ (197.43% vs. 50.68%), K+ (80.40% vs. 69.90%), CEC (24.61% vs. 17.35%), and total organic carbon (82.21% vs. 69.89%). Also, the rhizosphere affected regeneration soils more than monoculture, indicated by higher Al3+ (50.68% vs. ns) and available P (32.31% vs. ns), K+ (203.44% vs. ns), CEC (34.90% vs. 20.93), and total organic carbon (91.55% vs. 63.23%). These results indicate higher nutrient availability in naturally regenerated than monoculture sites, as higher species diversity and better plant litter quality are expected. This meta-analysis shows that coniferous and naturally regenerated trees had a higher influence on the rhizosphere and soil properties than broadleaved and monocultures. Management practices must be revisited to ensure the long-term sustainability of forestry activity, and studies in tropical zones must be intensified.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2024-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/6363710.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-63637Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 40 (2024): Continuous Publication; e40005Bioscience Journal ; v. 40 (2024): Continuous Publication; e400051981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/63637/38432Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2024 Ana Paula Hummes, Jaqueline Huzar Novakowiski, Ivan Ricardo Carvalho, Edson Campanhola Bortoluzzihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHummes, Ana PaulaNovakowiski, Jaqueline HuzarCarvalho, Ivan RicardoBortoluzzi, Edson Campanhola2024-04-03T20:47:42Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/63637Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2024-04-03T20:47:42Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands
title A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands
spellingShingle A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands
Hummes, Ana Paula
Broadleaf
Coniferous
Monoculture
Regeneration
Rhizosphere.
Agricultural Sciences
title_short A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands
title_full A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands
title_sort A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands
author Hummes, Ana Paula
author_facet Hummes, Ana Paula
Novakowiski, Jaqueline Huzar
Carvalho, Ivan Ricardo
Bortoluzzi, Edson Campanhola
author_role author
author2 Novakowiski, Jaqueline Huzar
Carvalho, Ivan Ricardo
Bortoluzzi, Edson Campanhola
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hummes, Ana Paula
Novakowiski, Jaqueline Huzar
Carvalho, Ivan Ricardo
Bortoluzzi, Edson Campanhola
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Broadleaf
Coniferous
Monoculture
Regeneration
Rhizosphere.
Agricultural Sciences
topic Broadleaf
Coniferous
Monoculture
Regeneration
Rhizosphere.
Agricultural Sciences
description Monoculture for timber production has been replacing natural environments as the demand for renewable energy sources increases. The lack of nutrient compensation may increase the risk of soil depletion, thus changing soil properties. To summarize the impact of forestry activities in edaphic environments, we present a meta-analysis on the rhizosphere effects of coniferous and broadleaved trees established as monoculture and natural regeneration on soil physicochemical properties. Records of soil attributes published in peer-reviewed journals from eight countries were collected. Clay content changed only in monoculture sites, decreasing 55.51% in the rhizosphere, while silt and sand presented significant variations in both monoculture and naturally regenerated areas. Conifers affected the soil more than broadleaved trees, evidenced by higher pH reduction (-2.96% vs. -1.98%) and higher increase of Al3+ (197.43% vs. 50.68%), K+ (80.40% vs. 69.90%), CEC (24.61% vs. 17.35%), and total organic carbon (82.21% vs. 69.89%). Also, the rhizosphere affected regeneration soils more than monoculture, indicated by higher Al3+ (50.68% vs. ns) and available P (32.31% vs. ns), K+ (203.44% vs. ns), CEC (34.90% vs. 20.93), and total organic carbon (91.55% vs. 63.23%). These results indicate higher nutrient availability in naturally regenerated than monoculture sites, as higher species diversity and better plant litter quality are expected. This meta-analysis shows that coniferous and naturally regenerated trees had a higher influence on the rhizosphere and soil properties than broadleaved and monocultures. Management practices must be revisited to ensure the long-term sustainability of forestry activity, and studies in tropical zones must be intensified.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/63637
10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-63637
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/63637
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-63637
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/63637/38432
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 40 (2024): Continuous Publication; e40005
Bioscience Journal ; v. 40 (2024): Continuous Publication; e40005
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069065214230528