Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gama, Diego Rangel da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ferreira, Kalline Mendes, Souza, Vanuza de, Yuri, Jony Eishi, Mesquita, Alessandro Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/40011
Resumo: Shading screens are widely used to control excessive solar radiation, thereby changing plant growth. Thus, through physiological indices the objective was to evaluate the growth of three cultivars of minitomatoes under colored meshes. The experiment was conducted from April to July in the DTCS / UNEB experimental field in experiment DBC with subdivided plots, and four replicates, comprised of three shaded environments and the control treatment, three cultivars, and seven plant sampling seasons. For growth analysis, we used the destructive method, total dry matter was determined after drying it in an oven at 65°C. The total leaf area (LAI) was obtained using the software QUANT. Results showed that there was no interaction between environments and the other factors. Regarding leaf area index, cvs. Shani and Sweet Million stood out in all environments, whereas cv. Red Sugar had a similar behavior in all environments. Shani obtained the best indices in open sun environment and in the environment covered with red shading screen, and Sweet Million obtained the best index under gray shading screen. Red Sugar had the lowest LAI, and consequently, the lowest SLA and LAR. On the other hand, it showed the highest RPF, since it obtained the highest dry matter in leaves compared to the other cultivars. Cvs. Shani and Sweet Million showed the best: TAL, TCR, TCA and TCC.
id UFU-14_aca36817cfa17e3767bd55e3fcd268c6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/40011
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environmentÍndices fisiológicos de cultivares de minitomates cultivados em ambientes protegidosShading screensLeaf areaGrowth rate.Agricultural SciencesTelas de sombreamento.Área foliar.Taxa de crescimento.Shading screens are widely used to control excessive solar radiation, thereby changing plant growth. Thus, through physiological indices the objective was to evaluate the growth of three cultivars of minitomatoes under colored meshes. The experiment was conducted from April to July in the DTCS / UNEB experimental field in experiment DBC with subdivided plots, and four replicates, comprised of three shaded environments and the control treatment, three cultivars, and seven plant sampling seasons. For growth analysis, we used the destructive method, total dry matter was determined after drying it in an oven at 65°C. The total leaf area (LAI) was obtained using the software QUANT. Results showed that there was no interaction between environments and the other factors. Regarding leaf area index, cvs. Shani and Sweet Million stood out in all environments, whereas cv. Red Sugar had a similar behavior in all environments. Shani obtained the best indices in open sun environment and in the environment covered with red shading screen, and Sweet Million obtained the best index under gray shading screen. Red Sugar had the lowest LAI, and consequently, the lowest SLA and LAR. On the other hand, it showed the highest RPF, since it obtained the highest dry matter in leaves compared to the other cultivars. Cvs. Shani and Sweet Million showed the best: TAL, TCR, TCA and TCC.As telas de sombreamento são utilizadas para controlar a radiação solar excessiva, podendo alterar o crescimento das plantas. Desse modo, objetivou-se por meio de índices fisiológicos avaliar o crescimento de três cultivares de mini tomates sob malhas coloridas. O experimento foi conduzido no período de abril a julho no campo experimental do DTCS/UNEB em delineamento experimental DBC, com parcelas subsubdivididas, com quatro repetições, compostos de três ambientes sombreados além do controle, três cultivares e sete épocas de amostragens. Para análise de crescimento, utilizou-se o método destrutivo e as massas secas totais obtidas após secagem em estufa a 65°C. A área foliar total foi obtida usando-se o software QUANT. Os resultados mostraram que não houve interação entre os ambientes e os demais fatores. Quanto as cvs., para índice de área foliar (LAI), destacaram-se as cvs. Shani e Sweet Million dentro de cada ambiente, tendo a cultivar Red Sugar comportamento similar nos ambientes. A cv. Shani obteve os melhores índices no ambiente a céu aberto e com tela vermelha e a cv. Sweet Million o melhor índice na tela cinza. A cv. Red Sugar apresentou o menor LAI, e consequentemente à menor AFE e RAF, em contrapartida apresentou a maior RPF, uma vez que obteve a maior massa seca nas folhas quando comparada as outras cultivares. As cvs. Shani e Sweet Million apresentaram as melhores: TAL, TCR, TCA e TCC.EDUFU2020-08-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4001110.14393/BJ-v36n5a2020-40011Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 5 (2020): Sept./Oct.; 1507-1517Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 5 (2020): Sept./Oct.; 1507-15171981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/40011/29604Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2020 Diego Rangel da Silva Gama, Kalline Mendes Ferreira, Vanuza de Souza, Jony Eishi Yuri, Alessandro Carlos Mesquitahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGama, Diego Rangel da SilvaFerreira, Kalline MendesSouza, Vanuza deYuri, Jony EishiMesquita, Alessandro Carlos2022-06-10T13:07:21Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/40011Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-06-10T13:07:21Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment
Índices fisiológicos de cultivares de minitomates cultivados em ambientes protegidos
title Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment
spellingShingle Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment
Gama, Diego Rangel da Silva
Shading screens
Leaf area
Growth rate.
Agricultural Sciences
Telas de sombreamento.
Área foliar.
Taxa de crescimento.
title_short Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment
title_full Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment
title_fullStr Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment
title_full_unstemmed Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment
title_sort Physiological indexes of mini tomato cultivars grown in a protected environment
author Gama, Diego Rangel da Silva
author_facet Gama, Diego Rangel da Silva
Ferreira, Kalline Mendes
Souza, Vanuza de
Yuri, Jony Eishi
Mesquita, Alessandro Carlos
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, Kalline Mendes
Souza, Vanuza de
Yuri, Jony Eishi
Mesquita, Alessandro Carlos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gama, Diego Rangel da Silva
Ferreira, Kalline Mendes
Souza, Vanuza de
Yuri, Jony Eishi
Mesquita, Alessandro Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Shading screens
Leaf area
Growth rate.
Agricultural Sciences
Telas de sombreamento.
Área foliar.
Taxa de crescimento.
topic Shading screens
Leaf area
Growth rate.
Agricultural Sciences
Telas de sombreamento.
Área foliar.
Taxa de crescimento.
description Shading screens are widely used to control excessive solar radiation, thereby changing plant growth. Thus, through physiological indices the objective was to evaluate the growth of three cultivars of minitomatoes under colored meshes. The experiment was conducted from April to July in the DTCS / UNEB experimental field in experiment DBC with subdivided plots, and four replicates, comprised of three shaded environments and the control treatment, three cultivars, and seven plant sampling seasons. For growth analysis, we used the destructive method, total dry matter was determined after drying it in an oven at 65°C. The total leaf area (LAI) was obtained using the software QUANT. Results showed that there was no interaction between environments and the other factors. Regarding leaf area index, cvs. Shani and Sweet Million stood out in all environments, whereas cv. Red Sugar had a similar behavior in all environments. Shani obtained the best indices in open sun environment and in the environment covered with red shading screen, and Sweet Million obtained the best index under gray shading screen. Red Sugar had the lowest LAI, and consequently, the lowest SLA and LAR. On the other hand, it showed the highest RPF, since it obtained the highest dry matter in leaves compared to the other cultivars. Cvs. Shani and Sweet Million showed the best: TAL, TCR, TCA and TCC.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/40011
10.14393/BJ-v36n5a2020-40011
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/40011
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n5a2020-40011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/40011/29604
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 5 (2020): Sept./Oct.; 1507-1517
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 5 (2020): Sept./Oct.; 1507-1517
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069079121494016