Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Matos, Felipe de Souza, Cericato, Graziela Oro, Rosário, Henrique Damiam, Pithon, Matheus Melo, Paranhos, Luiz Renato
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963
Resumo: The need for greater understanding of subjective standards of beauty is important when combining a successful dental plan with the real needs of patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review to assess whether dentists are more critical in assessing facial esthetics than laypersons. The cross-sectional studies selected compared dentists and laypersons regarding the perception of facial changes through photographs. The survey was conducted in four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and OpenGrey) with no restriction of time or language, and was assessed by two reviewers who were based on the PVO strategy. Then, a manual search through the references of the selected articles was performed in order to find surveys that did not fit in said search strategy. The examiners assessed the risk of bias and quality in individual studies. The process of data synthesis was performed through a descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Three relevant articles were selected from an initial total of 979 articles collected. Most studies found that dentists were more critical than laypersons; however, facial modifications were different. Only one survey manipulated the changes on a computer, while the others worked with changes on the patient. Given the methodological diversity of the studies, it was not possible to establish a parameter to validate the results presented.
id UFU-14_ca95edd1def72528345f3e616a450892
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32963
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review Dentists. Esthetics. Face. Perception.Health SciencesThe need for greater understanding of subjective standards of beauty is important when combining a successful dental plan with the real needs of patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review to assess whether dentists are more critical in assessing facial esthetics than laypersons. The cross-sectional studies selected compared dentists and laypersons regarding the perception of facial changes through photographs. The survey was conducted in four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and OpenGrey) with no restriction of time or language, and was assessed by two reviewers who were based on the PVO strategy. Then, a manual search through the references of the selected articles was performed in order to find surveys that did not fit in said search strategy. The examiners assessed the risk of bias and quality in individual studies. The process of data synthesis was performed through a descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Three relevant articles were selected from an initial total of 979 articles collected. Most studies found that dentists were more critical than laypersons; however, facial modifications were different. Only one survey manipulated the changes on a computer, while the others worked with changes on the patient. Given the methodological diversity of the studies, it was not possible to establish a parameter to validate the results presented.The need for greater understanding of subjective standards of beauty is important when combining a successful dental plan with the real needs of patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review to assess whether dentists are more critical in assessing facial esthetics than laypersons. The cross-sectional studies selected compared dentists and laypersons regarding the perception of facial changes through photographs. The survey was conducted in four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and OpenGrey) with no restriction of time or language, and was assessed by two reviewers who were based on the PVO strategy. Then, a manual search through the references of the selected articles was performed in order to find surveys that did not fit in said search strategy. The examiners assessed the risk of bias and quality in individual studies. The process of data synthesis was performed through a descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Three relevant articles were selected from an initial total of 979 articles collected. Most studies found that dentists were more critical than laypersons; however, facial modifications were different. Only one survey manipulated the changes on a computer, while the others worked with changes on the patient. Given the methodological diversity of the studies, it was not possible to establish a parameter to validate the results presented.EDUFU2016-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3296310.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32963Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 1128-1137Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 1128-11371981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963/18555Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho Barbosa, Felipe de Souza Matos, Graziela Oro Cericato, Henrique Damiam Rosário, Matheus Melo Pithon, Luiz Renato Paranhoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa, Priscilla Bispo de CarvalhoMatos, Felipe de SouzaCericato, Graziela OroRosário, Henrique DamiamPithon, Matheus MeloParanhos, Luiz Renato2022-02-23T00:25:47Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32963Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-23T00:25:47Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
title Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
spellingShingle Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho
Dentists. Esthetics. Face. Perception.
Health Sciences
title_short Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
title_full Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
title_fullStr Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
title_sort Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
author Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho
author_facet Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho
Matos, Felipe de Souza
Cericato, Graziela Oro
Rosário, Henrique Damiam
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Paranhos, Luiz Renato
author_role author
author2 Matos, Felipe de Souza
Cericato, Graziela Oro
Rosário, Henrique Damiam
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Paranhos, Luiz Renato
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho
Matos, Felipe de Souza
Cericato, Graziela Oro
Rosário, Henrique Damiam
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Paranhos, Luiz Renato
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dentists. Esthetics. Face. Perception.
Health Sciences
topic Dentists. Esthetics. Face. Perception.
Health Sciences
description The need for greater understanding of subjective standards of beauty is important when combining a successful dental plan with the real needs of patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review to assess whether dentists are more critical in assessing facial esthetics than laypersons. The cross-sectional studies selected compared dentists and laypersons regarding the perception of facial changes through photographs. The survey was conducted in four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and OpenGrey) with no restriction of time or language, and was assessed by two reviewers who were based on the PVO strategy. Then, a manual search through the references of the selected articles was performed in order to find surveys that did not fit in said search strategy. The examiners assessed the risk of bias and quality in individual studies. The process of data synthesis was performed through a descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Three relevant articles were selected from an initial total of 979 articles collected. Most studies found that dentists were more critical than laypersons; however, facial modifications were different. Only one survey manipulated the changes on a computer, while the others worked with changes on the patient. Given the methodological diversity of the studies, it was not possible to establish a parameter to validate the results presented.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963
10.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32963
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32963
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963/18555
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 1128-1137
Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 1128-1137
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069076413022208