Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963 |
Resumo: | The need for greater understanding of subjective standards of beauty is important when combining a successful dental plan with the real needs of patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review to assess whether dentists are more critical in assessing facial esthetics than laypersons. The cross-sectional studies selected compared dentists and laypersons regarding the perception of facial changes through photographs. The survey was conducted in four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and OpenGrey) with no restriction of time or language, and was assessed by two reviewers who were based on the PVO strategy. Then, a manual search through the references of the selected articles was performed in order to find surveys that did not fit in said search strategy. The examiners assessed the risk of bias and quality in individual studies. The process of data synthesis was performed through a descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Three relevant articles were selected from an initial total of 979 articles collected. Most studies found that dentists were more critical than laypersons; however, facial modifications were different. Only one survey manipulated the changes on a computer, while the others worked with changes on the patient. Given the methodological diversity of the studies, it was not possible to establish a parameter to validate the results presented. |
id |
UFU-14_ca95edd1def72528345f3e616a450892 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32963 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review Dentists. Esthetics. Face. Perception.Health SciencesThe need for greater understanding of subjective standards of beauty is important when combining a successful dental plan with the real needs of patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review to assess whether dentists are more critical in assessing facial esthetics than laypersons. The cross-sectional studies selected compared dentists and laypersons regarding the perception of facial changes through photographs. The survey was conducted in four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and OpenGrey) with no restriction of time or language, and was assessed by two reviewers who were based on the PVO strategy. Then, a manual search through the references of the selected articles was performed in order to find surveys that did not fit in said search strategy. The examiners assessed the risk of bias and quality in individual studies. The process of data synthesis was performed through a descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Three relevant articles were selected from an initial total of 979 articles collected. Most studies found that dentists were more critical than laypersons; however, facial modifications were different. Only one survey manipulated the changes on a computer, while the others worked with changes on the patient. Given the methodological diversity of the studies, it was not possible to establish a parameter to validate the results presented.The need for greater understanding of subjective standards of beauty is important when combining a successful dental plan with the real needs of patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review to assess whether dentists are more critical in assessing facial esthetics than laypersons. The cross-sectional studies selected compared dentists and laypersons regarding the perception of facial changes through photographs. The survey was conducted in four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and OpenGrey) with no restriction of time or language, and was assessed by two reviewers who were based on the PVO strategy. Then, a manual search through the references of the selected articles was performed in order to find surveys that did not fit in said search strategy. The examiners assessed the risk of bias and quality in individual studies. The process of data synthesis was performed through a descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Three relevant articles were selected from an initial total of 979 articles collected. Most studies found that dentists were more critical than laypersons; however, facial modifications were different. Only one survey manipulated the changes on a computer, while the others worked with changes on the patient. Given the methodological diversity of the studies, it was not possible to establish a parameter to validate the results presented.EDUFU2016-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3296310.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32963Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 1128-1137Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 1128-11371981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963/18555Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2016 Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho Barbosa, Felipe de Souza Matos, Graziela Oro Cericato, Henrique Damiam Rosário, Matheus Melo Pithon, Luiz Renato Paranhoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa, Priscilla Bispo de CarvalhoMatos, Felipe de SouzaCericato, Graziela OroRosário, Henrique DamiamPithon, Matheus MeloParanhos, Luiz Renato2022-02-23T00:25:47Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/32963Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-23T00:25:47Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review |
title |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho Dentists. Esthetics. Face. Perception. Health Sciences |
title_short |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review |
title_full |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Perception of laypersons and dentists regarding esthetic facial changes: a systematic review |
author |
Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho |
author_facet |
Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho Matos, Felipe de Souza Cericato, Graziela Oro Rosário, Henrique Damiam Pithon, Matheus Melo Paranhos, Luiz Renato |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matos, Felipe de Souza Cericato, Graziela Oro Rosário, Henrique Damiam Pithon, Matheus Melo Paranhos, Luiz Renato |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho Matos, Felipe de Souza Cericato, Graziela Oro Rosário, Henrique Damiam Pithon, Matheus Melo Paranhos, Luiz Renato |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dentists. Esthetics. Face. Perception. Health Sciences |
topic |
Dentists. Esthetics. Face. Perception. Health Sciences |
description |
The need for greater understanding of subjective standards of beauty is important when combining a successful dental plan with the real needs of patients. This study aimed to perform a systematic review to assess whether dentists are more critical in assessing facial esthetics than laypersons. The cross-sectional studies selected compared dentists and laypersons regarding the perception of facial changes through photographs. The survey was conducted in four databases (PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and OpenGrey) with no restriction of time or language, and was assessed by two reviewers who were based on the PVO strategy. Then, a manual search through the references of the selected articles was performed in order to find surveys that did not fit in said search strategy. The examiners assessed the risk of bias and quality in individual studies. The process of data synthesis was performed through a descriptive analysis of the selected studies. Three relevant articles were selected from an initial total of 979 articles collected. Most studies found that dentists were more critical than laypersons; however, facial modifications were different. Only one survey manipulated the changes on a computer, while the others worked with changes on the patient. Given the methodological diversity of the studies, it was not possible to establish a parameter to validate the results presented. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963 10.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32963 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v32n4a2016-32963 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/32963/18555 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 1128-1137 Bioscience Journal ; v. 32 n. 4 (2016): July/Aug.; 1128-1137 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069076413022208 |