Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caldas, Marilize Bittencourtt
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Diniz, Jéssica Pereira, Silva, Andrisley Joaquim da, Baio, Simone Pereira da Silva, Borges, Monica Cristina Rezende Zuffo, Nogueira, Kenio Batista, Roque, Cassiano Garcia, Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/39714
Resumo: Nitrogen is one of the most important nutrients for increasing the yield and quality of forages. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the different forms of application, spread on the total area using urea fertilizer and foliar using liquid urea, aiming at evaluating the yield and qualitative traits of Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça, at different times of the year. The experimental design was completely randomized blocks in subdivided plots, with three blocks, four treatments, and three collections. The treatments were applied in March 2015 and consisted of the following treatments: 1-control; 2-urea; 3-liquid urea; 4-urea + liquid urea; 5-urea + micronutrients; 6-urea + N liquid; 7-urea + N liquid + micronutrients; 8-control. Samples were collected in May, October, and December 2015. Crude protein (CP) dry matter (DM), mineral matter (MM), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were evaluated. Results revealed that nitrogen was determinant in improving the yield and forage quality. Treatments with urea spread on total area resulted in increased dry matter production. For the crude protein, the source and the application form are not decisive. Collection time with higher rainfall positively affected the dry matter production, crude protein, and ADF, while urea spread on total area showed the best cost-benefit due to the good results of yield and quality.
id UFU-14_cf9c07bb0ec7d3e5f0b2b34302dcbd9b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/39714
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximumFormas de aplicação de adubo nitrogenado em Panicum maximumforage productivitycrude proteinacid detergent fiber.Agricultural SciencesNitrogen is one of the most important nutrients for increasing the yield and quality of forages. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the different forms of application, spread on the total area using urea fertilizer and foliar using liquid urea, aiming at evaluating the yield and qualitative traits of Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça, at different times of the year. The experimental design was completely randomized blocks in subdivided plots, with three blocks, four treatments, and three collections. The treatments were applied in March 2015 and consisted of the following treatments: 1-control; 2-urea; 3-liquid urea; 4-urea + liquid urea; 5-urea + micronutrients; 6-urea + N liquid; 7-urea + N liquid + micronutrients; 8-control. Samples were collected in May, October, and December 2015. Crude protein (CP) dry matter (DM), mineral matter (MM), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were evaluated. Results revealed that nitrogen was determinant in improving the yield and forage quality. Treatments with urea spread on total area resulted in increased dry matter production. For the crude protein, the source and the application form are not decisive. Collection time with higher rainfall positively affected the dry matter production, crude protein, and ADF, while urea spread on total area showed the best cost-benefit due to the good results of yield and quality.O nitrogênio é um dos nutrientes mais importantes para o aumento da produtividade e qualidade das forrageiras. Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o efeito das diferentes formas de aplicações, sendo elas à lanço (utilizando ureia fertilizante) e foliar (utilizando ureia líquida), a fim de avaliar as características produtivas e qualitativas da forrageira Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça, em diferentes épocas do ano. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos inteiramente casualizados em parcelas subdivididas, com oito tratamentos e três coletas. Os tratamentos foram aplicados em março de 2015 e eram constituídos pelo tratamento 1: controle, tratamento 2: ureia, tratamento 3: ureia líquida, 4: ureia + ureia líquida; 5-ureia + micronutrientes; 6-ureia + N líquido; 7- ureia + N líquido + micronutrients; 8-controle. Foram realizadas coletas em maio/2015, outubro/2015 e dezembro/2015. Foram avaliadas proteína bruta (PB), massa de matéria seca (MMS), matéria mineral (MM) e fibra em detergente ácido (FDA). Os resultados revelaram que o nitrogênio foi determinante na melhora da produtividade e qualidade da forrageira. Os tratamentos com ureia aplicada a lanço resultaram na maior produção de massa de matéria seca. Para a proteína bruta, a fonte e o formato de aplicação não foram decisivos. A época de coleta com maior pluviosidade afetou positivamente a produção de massa de matéria seca, proteína bruta e o FDA da forrageira; e a ureia aplicada a lanço apresentou o melhor custo-benefício atrelado aos bons resultados de produtividade e qualidade.EDUFU2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3971410.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-39714Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 23-29Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 23-291981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/39714/27505Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2020 Marilize Bittencourtt Caldas, Jéssica Pereira Diniz, Andrisley Joaquim da Silva, Simone Pereira da Silva Baio, Monica Cristina Rezende Zuffo Borges, Kenio Batista Nogueira, Cassiano Garcia Roque, Paulo Eduardo Teodorohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaldas, Marilize BittencourttDiniz, Jéssica PereiraSilva, Andrisley Joaquim da Baio, Simone Pereira da Silva Borges, Monica Cristina Rezende ZuffoNogueira, Kenio BatistaRoque, Cassiano GarciaTeodoro, Paulo Eduardo2022-01-14T20:10:50Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/39714Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-14T20:10:50Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum
Formas de aplicação de adubo nitrogenado em Panicum maximum
title Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum
spellingShingle Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum
Caldas, Marilize Bittencourtt
forage productivity
crude protein
acid detergent fiber.
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum
title_full Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum
title_fullStr Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum
title_full_unstemmed Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum
title_sort Forms of nitrogen fertilizer application in Panicum maximum
author Caldas, Marilize Bittencourtt
author_facet Caldas, Marilize Bittencourtt
Diniz, Jéssica Pereira
Silva, Andrisley Joaquim da
Baio, Simone Pereira da Silva
Borges, Monica Cristina Rezende Zuffo
Nogueira, Kenio Batista
Roque, Cassiano Garcia
Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Diniz, Jéssica Pereira
Silva, Andrisley Joaquim da
Baio, Simone Pereira da Silva
Borges, Monica Cristina Rezende Zuffo
Nogueira, Kenio Batista
Roque, Cassiano Garcia
Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caldas, Marilize Bittencourtt
Diniz, Jéssica Pereira
Silva, Andrisley Joaquim da
Baio, Simone Pereira da Silva
Borges, Monica Cristina Rezende Zuffo
Nogueira, Kenio Batista
Roque, Cassiano Garcia
Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv forage productivity
crude protein
acid detergent fiber.
Agricultural Sciences
topic forage productivity
crude protein
acid detergent fiber.
Agricultural Sciences
description Nitrogen is one of the most important nutrients for increasing the yield and quality of forages. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the different forms of application, spread on the total area using urea fertilizer and foliar using liquid urea, aiming at evaluating the yield and qualitative traits of Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça, at different times of the year. The experimental design was completely randomized blocks in subdivided plots, with three blocks, four treatments, and three collections. The treatments were applied in March 2015 and consisted of the following treatments: 1-control; 2-urea; 3-liquid urea; 4-urea + liquid urea; 5-urea + micronutrients; 6-urea + N liquid; 7-urea + N liquid + micronutrients; 8-control. Samples were collected in May, October, and December 2015. Crude protein (CP) dry matter (DM), mineral matter (MM), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were evaluated. Results revealed that nitrogen was determinant in improving the yield and forage quality. Treatments with urea spread on total area resulted in increased dry matter production. For the crude protein, the source and the application form are not decisive. Collection time with higher rainfall positively affected the dry matter production, crude protein, and ADF, while urea spread on total area showed the best cost-benefit due to the good results of yield and quality.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/39714
10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-39714
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/39714
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-39714
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/39714/27505
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 23-29
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Feb.; 23-29
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069078623420416