Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330 |
Resumo: | Research using anaerobic filters as alternative materials to gravel becomes fundamental, especially if they are low cost, accessible and have high efficiency in the treatment of swine wastewater. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of anaerobic filters with different types of support media, as an alternative to gravel, in the treatment of swine wastewater. We carried out the experiment in a completely randomized design. The treatments were composed of anaerobic filters with four different media (gravel, bamboo, luffa sponge and foam), three replications in a time-repeated measurements scheme (0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 days post-filter establishment). To determine the efficiency of removal by the filters, we performed analysis of turbidity, total solids, biochemical oxygen demand (bod), total n and total p in the affluent to and effluent from the filters. Among the alternative media, bamboo presented an efficiency of removal of the evaluated attributes similar and, in most cases, superior to gravel. From 60 to 180 days of filter operation, the luffa sponge remained with high turbidity and total solids removals, with the greatest decrease at 240 days of operation. After two months of filter operation, the alternative support media exhibited bod and total n removal similar to that of gravel. At 240 days of operation, the filters containing luffa sponge and bamboo showed the highest total p removal. |
id |
UFU-14_d4a86d3c8b46317467d9cf44b6ae9d0b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42330 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support mediaTratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura em filtros anaeróbios com diferentes tipos de meio suporteWastewaterSecondary treatmentRemoval efficiencyAgricultural SciencesResearch using anaerobic filters as alternative materials to gravel becomes fundamental, especially if they are low cost, accessible and have high efficiency in the treatment of swine wastewater. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of anaerobic filters with different types of support media, as an alternative to gravel, in the treatment of swine wastewater. We carried out the experiment in a completely randomized design. The treatments were composed of anaerobic filters with four different media (gravel, bamboo, luffa sponge and foam), three replications in a time-repeated measurements scheme (0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 days post-filter establishment). To determine the efficiency of removal by the filters, we performed analysis of turbidity, total solids, biochemical oxygen demand (bod), total n and total p in the affluent to and effluent from the filters. Among the alternative media, bamboo presented an efficiency of removal of the evaluated attributes similar and, in most cases, superior to gravel. From 60 to 180 days of filter operation, the luffa sponge remained with high turbidity and total solids removals, with the greatest decrease at 240 days of operation. After two months of filter operation, the alternative support media exhibited bod and total n removal similar to that of gravel. At 240 days of operation, the filters containing luffa sponge and bamboo showed the highest total p removal.Pesquisas utilizando filtros anaeróbios com materiais alternativos à brita tornam-se fundamentais, principalmente se forem de baixo custo, acessíveis e possibilitem elevada eficiência no tratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura. Objetivou-se avaliar a eficiência de filtros anaeróbios com diferentes tipos de meio suporte, alternativos à brita, no tratamento de águas residuárias da suinocultura. O experimento foi realizado em delineamento inteiramente ao acaso, sendo os tratamentos compostos por filtros anaeróbios com quatro diferentes meios suportes (brita, bambu, bucha vegetal e espuma), três repetições em esquema de medidas repetidas no tempo, (0, 60, 120, 180 e 240 dias pós-estabelecimento dos filtros). Para a determinação da eficiência de remoção nos filtros, análises de turbidez, sólidos totais, Demanda Bioquímica de Oxigênio (DBO), N-total e P-total foram realizadas no afluente e no efluente aos filtros. Dentre os meios suportes alternativos, o bambu apresentou eficiências de remoção dos atributos avaliados semelhantes e, na maioria das vezes, superiores à brita. Dos 60 aos 180 dias de operação dos filtros, a bucha vegetal manteve-se com elevadas remoções de turbidez e sólidos totais, tendo o maior decréscimo, aos 240 dias de operação. Após 2 meses de operação dos filtros, os meios suportes alternativos apresentaram remoções de DBO e N-total semelhantes à brita. Aos 240 dias de operação, os filtros contendo bucha vegetal e bambu apresentaram as maiores remoções de P-total.EDUFU2019-04-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4233010.14393/BJ-v35n2a20198-42330Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Mar./Apr.; 561-569Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 2 (2019): Mar./Apr.; 561-5691981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330/25809Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Eduardo France Oza, Paola Alfonsa Vieira Lo Monaco, Ismail Ramalho Haddad, Millena Monteiro dos Santos, Débora Moro Soela, Gustavo Haddad Souza Vieirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOza, Eduardo FranceLo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa VieiraHaddad, Ismail Ramalhodos Santos, Millena MonteiroSoela, Débora MoroVieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza2022-02-02T11:33:13Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42330Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-02T11:33:13Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media Tratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura em filtros anaeróbios com diferentes tipos de meio suporte |
title |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media |
spellingShingle |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media Oza, Eduardo France Wastewater Secondary treatment Removal efficiency Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media |
title_full |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media |
title_fullStr |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media |
title_full_unstemmed |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media |
title_sort |
Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media |
author |
Oza, Eduardo France |
author_facet |
Oza, Eduardo France Lo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa Vieira Haddad, Ismail Ramalho dos Santos, Millena Monteiro Soela, Débora Moro Vieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa Vieira Haddad, Ismail Ramalho dos Santos, Millena Monteiro Soela, Débora Moro Vieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oza, Eduardo France Lo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa Vieira Haddad, Ismail Ramalho dos Santos, Millena Monteiro Soela, Débora Moro Vieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Wastewater Secondary treatment Removal efficiency Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Wastewater Secondary treatment Removal efficiency Agricultural Sciences |
description |
Research using anaerobic filters as alternative materials to gravel becomes fundamental, especially if they are low cost, accessible and have high efficiency in the treatment of swine wastewater. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of anaerobic filters with different types of support media, as an alternative to gravel, in the treatment of swine wastewater. We carried out the experiment in a completely randomized design. The treatments were composed of anaerobic filters with four different media (gravel, bamboo, luffa sponge and foam), three replications in a time-repeated measurements scheme (0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 days post-filter establishment). To determine the efficiency of removal by the filters, we performed analysis of turbidity, total solids, biochemical oxygen demand (bod), total n and total p in the affluent to and effluent from the filters. Among the alternative media, bamboo presented an efficiency of removal of the evaluated attributes similar and, in most cases, superior to gravel. From 60 to 180 days of filter operation, the luffa sponge remained with high turbidity and total solids removals, with the greatest decrease at 240 days of operation. After two months of filter operation, the alternative support media exhibited bod and total n removal similar to that of gravel. At 240 days of operation, the filters containing luffa sponge and bamboo showed the highest total p removal. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330 10.14393/BJ-v35n2a20198-42330 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v35n2a20198-42330 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330/25809 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Mar./Apr.; 561-569 Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 2 (2019): Mar./Apr.; 561-569 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069080333647872 |