Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oza, Eduardo France
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa Vieira, Haddad, Ismail Ramalho, dos Santos, Millena Monteiro, Soela, Débora Moro, Vieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330
Resumo: Research using anaerobic filters as alternative materials to gravel becomes fundamental, especially if they are low cost, accessible and have high efficiency in the treatment of swine wastewater. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of anaerobic filters with different types of support media, as an alternative to gravel, in the treatment of swine wastewater. We carried out the experiment in a completely randomized design. The treatments were composed of anaerobic filters with four different media (gravel, bamboo, luffa sponge and foam), three replications in a time-repeated measurements scheme (0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 days post-filter establishment). To determine the efficiency of removal by the filters, we performed analysis of turbidity, total solids, biochemical oxygen demand (bod), total n and total p in the affluent to and effluent from the filters. Among the alternative media, bamboo presented an efficiency of removal of the evaluated attributes similar and, in most cases, superior to gravel. From 60 to 180 days of filter operation, the luffa sponge remained with high turbidity and total solids removals, with the greatest decrease at 240 days of operation. After two months of filter operation, the alternative support media exhibited bod and total n removal similar to that of gravel. At 240 days of operation, the filters containing luffa sponge and bamboo showed the highest total p removal.
id UFU-14_d4a86d3c8b46317467d9cf44b6ae9d0b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42330
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support mediaTratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura em filtros anaeróbios com diferentes tipos de meio suporteWastewaterSecondary treatmentRemoval efficiencyAgricultural SciencesResearch using anaerobic filters as alternative materials to gravel becomes fundamental, especially if they are low cost, accessible and have high efficiency in the treatment of swine wastewater. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of anaerobic filters with different types of support media, as an alternative to gravel, in the treatment of swine wastewater. We carried out the experiment in a completely randomized design. The treatments were composed of anaerobic filters with four different media (gravel, bamboo, luffa sponge and foam), three replications in a time-repeated measurements scheme (0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 days post-filter establishment). To determine the efficiency of removal by the filters, we performed analysis of turbidity, total solids, biochemical oxygen demand (bod), total n and total p in the affluent to and effluent from the filters. Among the alternative media, bamboo presented an efficiency of removal of the evaluated attributes similar and, in most cases, superior to gravel. From 60 to 180 days of filter operation, the luffa sponge remained with high turbidity and total solids removals, with the greatest decrease at 240 days of operation. After two months of filter operation, the alternative support media exhibited bod and total n removal similar to that of gravel. At 240 days of operation, the filters containing luffa sponge and bamboo showed the highest total p removal.Pesquisas utilizando filtros anaeróbios com materiais alternativos à brita tornam-se fundamentais, principalmente se forem de baixo custo, acessíveis e possibilitem elevada eficiência no tratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura. Objetivou-se avaliar a eficiência de filtros anaeróbios com diferentes tipos de meio suporte, alternativos à brita, no tratamento de águas residuárias da suinocultura. O experimento foi realizado em delineamento inteiramente ao acaso, sendo os tratamentos compostos por filtros anaeróbios com quatro diferentes meios suportes (brita, bambu, bucha vegetal e espuma), três repetições em esquema de medidas repetidas no tempo, (0, 60, 120, 180 e 240 dias pós-estabelecimento dos filtros). Para a determinação da eficiência de remoção nos filtros, análises de turbidez, sólidos totais, Demanda Bioquímica de Oxigênio (DBO), N-total e P-total foram realizadas no afluente e no efluente aos filtros. Dentre os meios suportes alternativos, o bambu apresentou eficiências de remoção dos atributos avaliados semelhantes e, na maioria das vezes, superiores à brita. Dos 60 aos 180 dias de operação dos filtros, a bucha vegetal manteve-se com elevadas remoções de turbidez e sólidos totais, tendo o maior decréscimo, aos 240 dias de operação. Após 2 meses de operação dos filtros, os meios suportes alternativos apresentaram remoções de DBO e N-total semelhantes à brita. Aos 240 dias de operação, os filtros contendo bucha vegetal e bambu apresentaram as maiores remoções de P-total.EDUFU2019-04-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4233010.14393/BJ-v35n2a20198-42330Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Mar./Apr.; 561-569Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 2 (2019): Mar./Apr.; 561-5691981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330/25809Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Eduardo France Oza, Paola Alfonsa Vieira Lo Monaco, Ismail Ramalho Haddad, Millena Monteiro dos Santos, Débora Moro Soela, Gustavo Haddad Souza Vieirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOza, Eduardo FranceLo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa VieiraHaddad, Ismail Ramalhodos Santos, Millena MonteiroSoela, Débora MoroVieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza2022-02-02T11:33:13Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42330Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-02T11:33:13Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
Tratamento de águas residuárias de suinocultura em filtros anaeróbios com diferentes tipos de meio suporte
title Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
spellingShingle Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
Oza, Eduardo France
Wastewater
Secondary treatment
Removal efficiency
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
title_full Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
title_fullStr Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
title_sort Treatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filters with different types of support media
author Oza, Eduardo France
author_facet Oza, Eduardo France
Lo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa Vieira
Haddad, Ismail Ramalho
dos Santos, Millena Monteiro
Soela, Débora Moro
Vieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza
author_role author
author2 Lo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa Vieira
Haddad, Ismail Ramalho
dos Santos, Millena Monteiro
Soela, Débora Moro
Vieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oza, Eduardo France
Lo Monaco, Paola Alfonsa Vieira
Haddad, Ismail Ramalho
dos Santos, Millena Monteiro
Soela, Débora Moro
Vieira, Gustavo Haddad Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Wastewater
Secondary treatment
Removal efficiency
Agricultural Sciences
topic Wastewater
Secondary treatment
Removal efficiency
Agricultural Sciences
description Research using anaerobic filters as alternative materials to gravel becomes fundamental, especially if they are low cost, accessible and have high efficiency in the treatment of swine wastewater. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of anaerobic filters with different types of support media, as an alternative to gravel, in the treatment of swine wastewater. We carried out the experiment in a completely randomized design. The treatments were composed of anaerobic filters with four different media (gravel, bamboo, luffa sponge and foam), three replications in a time-repeated measurements scheme (0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 days post-filter establishment). To determine the efficiency of removal by the filters, we performed analysis of turbidity, total solids, biochemical oxygen demand (bod), total n and total p in the affluent to and effluent from the filters. Among the alternative media, bamboo presented an efficiency of removal of the evaluated attributes similar and, in most cases, superior to gravel. From 60 to 180 days of filter operation, the luffa sponge remained with high turbidity and total solids removals, with the greatest decrease at 240 days of operation. After two months of filter operation, the alternative support media exhibited bod and total n removal similar to that of gravel. At 240 days of operation, the filters containing luffa sponge and bamboo showed the highest total p removal.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330
10.14393/BJ-v35n2a20198-42330
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v35n2a20198-42330
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42330/25809
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Mar./Apr.; 561-569
Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 2 (2019): Mar./Apr.; 561-569
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069080333647872