Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Paulo, Paula Daiana
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Fadini, Marcos Antônio Matielo, Marinho, Cidália Gabriela Santos, Mendes, Simone Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317
Resumo: Direct and indirect induced defense mechanisms against herbivores can be manifested in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Furthermore, there are constitutive defenses in which plants continuously express resistance traces. In recent decades has increased the production of transgenic maize plants that constitutively express proteins with insecticide action (Bt maize). The increase of the use of transgenic maize cultivars with the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) gene demand studies that evaluate the impacts caused by this technology on plant defense mechanisms and their impact on non-targeted organisms, as the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). We tested the hypothesis that Bt maize plants (expressing Cry1F protein) would be capable of inducing direct defenses to T. urticae after being attacked by these mites. Thus, we used plants of a commercial maize hybrid (30F35 Hx - expressing Cry1F protein) and plants of its respective non-Bt isogenic line (control). We compared the survival and reproductive performances of T. urticae on plants of both lines that were previously infested with conspecifics and on plants that did not suffer pre-infestations. The previous infestation of maize plants by T. urticae did not impacted the survival and reproductive abilities of adult and immature forms of the conspecific in both genotypes. These results suggest that, Bt maize expressing the Cry1F insecticidal protein, does not interfere in the induction of direct defense by the T. urticae when compared with conventional maize plants.
id UFU-14_d59a03fc6114ef5a430eff7924dfcc7f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42317
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plantsDefesa direta elicitada por Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) em milho BtPlant resistanceZea maysgenetically modified organismsmiteAgricultural SciencesDirect and indirect induced defense mechanisms against herbivores can be manifested in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Furthermore, there are constitutive defenses in which plants continuously express resistance traces. In recent decades has increased the production of transgenic maize plants that constitutively express proteins with insecticide action (Bt maize). The increase of the use of transgenic maize cultivars with the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) gene demand studies that evaluate the impacts caused by this technology on plant defense mechanisms and their impact on non-targeted organisms, as the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). We tested the hypothesis that Bt maize plants (expressing Cry1F protein) would be capable of inducing direct defenses to T. urticae after being attacked by these mites. Thus, we used plants of a commercial maize hybrid (30F35 Hx - expressing Cry1F protein) and plants of its respective non-Bt isogenic line (control). We compared the survival and reproductive performances of T. urticae on plants of both lines that were previously infested with conspecifics and on plants that did not suffer pre-infestations. The previous infestation of maize plants by T. urticae did not impacted the survival and reproductive abilities of adult and immature forms of the conspecific in both genotypes. These results suggest that, Bt maize expressing the Cry1F insecticidal protein, does not interfere in the induction of direct defense by the T. urticae when compared with conventional maize plants.Mecanismos diretos e indiretos de defesa induzida contra herbívoros podem manifestar-se em plantas de milho (Zea mays.). Além das defesas induzidas, existem as defesas constitutivas, nas quais as plantas expressam a resistência de forma contínua. Nas últimas décadas vem se difundindo a produção de plantas de milho geneticamente modificadas que expressam proteínas com ação inseticida de forma constitutiva (milho Bt). Com o crescente uso de cultivares de milho transgênico com o gene Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis), há uma demanda por estudos que avaliem os impactos causados ​​por essa tecnologia sobre os mecanismos de defesa das plantas e seu impacto sobre organismos não alvo, como o ácaro-rajado Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Testou-se a hipótese de que plantas de milho Bt (expressando a proteína Cry 1F) seriam capazes de induzir defesas diretas a T. urticae após o ataque por esses ácaros. Assim, foram utilizadas plantas de milhos híbridos comerciais (30F35 Hx expressando a proteína Cry 1F) e seu respectivo isogênico não-Bt (controle). Nós comparamos a sobrevivência e o desempenho reprodutivo de T. urticae em plantas de ambas as linhagens que foram previamente infestadas com coespecíficos e em plantas que não foram pré-infestadas. A infestação prévia de plantas de milho Bt por T. urticae não apresentou diferença nos padrões de sobrevivência de formas adultas e formas jovens do coespecífico em comparação com o milho convencional. Os resultados sugerem que, o fato de o milho Bt expressar a toxina inseticida Cry 1F, não interfere na indução de defesa direta pelo ácaro-rajado T. urticae quando comparado com plantas de milho convencional. EDUFU2019-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4231710.14393/BJ-v35n3a2019-42317Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2019): May/June; 903-909Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 3 (2019): May/June; 903-9091981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317/26127Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Paula Daiana de Paulo, Marcos Antônio Matielo Fadini, Cidália Gabriela Santos Marinho, Simone Martins Mendeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Paulo, Paula DaianaFadini, Marcos Antônio MatieloMarinho, Cidália Gabriela SantosMendes, Simone Martins2022-02-01T15:44:02Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42317Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-01T15:44:02Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
Defesa direta elicitada por Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) em milho Bt
title Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
spellingShingle Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
de Paulo, Paula Daiana
Plant resistance
Zea mays
genetically modified organisms
mite
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
title_full Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
title_fullStr Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
title_full_unstemmed Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
title_sort Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
author de Paulo, Paula Daiana
author_facet de Paulo, Paula Daiana
Fadini, Marcos Antônio Matielo
Marinho, Cidália Gabriela Santos
Mendes, Simone Martins
author_role author
author2 Fadini, Marcos Antônio Matielo
Marinho, Cidália Gabriela Santos
Mendes, Simone Martins
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Paulo, Paula Daiana
Fadini, Marcos Antônio Matielo
Marinho, Cidália Gabriela Santos
Mendes, Simone Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plant resistance
Zea mays
genetically modified organisms
mite
Agricultural Sciences
topic Plant resistance
Zea mays
genetically modified organisms
mite
Agricultural Sciences
description Direct and indirect induced defense mechanisms against herbivores can be manifested in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Furthermore, there are constitutive defenses in which plants continuously express resistance traces. In recent decades has increased the production of transgenic maize plants that constitutively express proteins with insecticide action (Bt maize). The increase of the use of transgenic maize cultivars with the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) gene demand studies that evaluate the impacts caused by this technology on plant defense mechanisms and their impact on non-targeted organisms, as the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). We tested the hypothesis that Bt maize plants (expressing Cry1F protein) would be capable of inducing direct defenses to T. urticae after being attacked by these mites. Thus, we used plants of a commercial maize hybrid (30F35 Hx - expressing Cry1F protein) and plants of its respective non-Bt isogenic line (control). We compared the survival and reproductive performances of T. urticae on plants of both lines that were previously infested with conspecifics and on plants that did not suffer pre-infestations. The previous infestation of maize plants by T. urticae did not impacted the survival and reproductive abilities of adult and immature forms of the conspecific in both genotypes. These results suggest that, Bt maize expressing the Cry1F insecticidal protein, does not interfere in the induction of direct defense by the T. urticae when compared with conventional maize plants.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317
10.14393/BJ-v35n3a2019-42317
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v35n3a2019-42317
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317/26127
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2019): May/June; 903-909
Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 3 (2019): May/June; 903-909
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069080316870656