Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317 |
Resumo: | Direct and indirect induced defense mechanisms against herbivores can be manifested in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Furthermore, there are constitutive defenses in which plants continuously express resistance traces. In recent decades has increased the production of transgenic maize plants that constitutively express proteins with insecticide action (Bt maize). The increase of the use of transgenic maize cultivars with the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) gene demand studies that evaluate the impacts caused by this technology on plant defense mechanisms and their impact on non-targeted organisms, as the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). We tested the hypothesis that Bt maize plants (expressing Cry1F protein) would be capable of inducing direct defenses to T. urticae after being attacked by these mites. Thus, we used plants of a commercial maize hybrid (30F35 Hx - expressing Cry1F protein) and plants of its respective non-Bt isogenic line (control). We compared the survival and reproductive performances of T. urticae on plants of both lines that were previously infested with conspecifics and on plants that did not suffer pre-infestations. The previous infestation of maize plants by T. urticae did not impacted the survival and reproductive abilities of adult and immature forms of the conspecific in both genotypes. These results suggest that, Bt maize expressing the Cry1F insecticidal protein, does not interfere in the induction of direct defense by the T. urticae when compared with conventional maize plants. |
id |
UFU-14_d59a03fc6114ef5a430eff7924dfcc7f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42317 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plantsDefesa direta elicitada por Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) em milho BtPlant resistanceZea maysgenetically modified organismsmiteAgricultural SciencesDirect and indirect induced defense mechanisms against herbivores can be manifested in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Furthermore, there are constitutive defenses in which plants continuously express resistance traces. In recent decades has increased the production of transgenic maize plants that constitutively express proteins with insecticide action (Bt maize). The increase of the use of transgenic maize cultivars with the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) gene demand studies that evaluate the impacts caused by this technology on plant defense mechanisms and their impact on non-targeted organisms, as the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). We tested the hypothesis that Bt maize plants (expressing Cry1F protein) would be capable of inducing direct defenses to T. urticae after being attacked by these mites. Thus, we used plants of a commercial maize hybrid (30F35 Hx - expressing Cry1F protein) and plants of its respective non-Bt isogenic line (control). We compared the survival and reproductive performances of T. urticae on plants of both lines that were previously infested with conspecifics and on plants that did not suffer pre-infestations. The previous infestation of maize plants by T. urticae did not impacted the survival and reproductive abilities of adult and immature forms of the conspecific in both genotypes. These results suggest that, Bt maize expressing the Cry1F insecticidal protein, does not interfere in the induction of direct defense by the T. urticae when compared with conventional maize plants.Mecanismos diretos e indiretos de defesa induzida contra herbívoros podem manifestar-se em plantas de milho (Zea mays.). Além das defesas induzidas, existem as defesas constitutivas, nas quais as plantas expressam a resistência de forma contínua. Nas últimas décadas vem se difundindo a produção de plantas de milho geneticamente modificadas que expressam proteínas com ação inseticida de forma constitutiva (milho Bt). Com o crescente uso de cultivares de milho transgênico com o gene Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis), há uma demanda por estudos que avaliem os impactos causados por essa tecnologia sobre os mecanismos de defesa das plantas e seu impacto sobre organismos não alvo, como o ácaro-rajado Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Testou-se a hipótese de que plantas de milho Bt (expressando a proteína Cry 1F) seriam capazes de induzir defesas diretas a T. urticae após o ataque por esses ácaros. Assim, foram utilizadas plantas de milhos híbridos comerciais (30F35 Hx expressando a proteína Cry 1F) e seu respectivo isogênico não-Bt (controle). Nós comparamos a sobrevivência e o desempenho reprodutivo de T. urticae em plantas de ambas as linhagens que foram previamente infestadas com coespecíficos e em plantas que não foram pré-infestadas. A infestação prévia de plantas de milho Bt por T. urticae não apresentou diferença nos padrões de sobrevivência de formas adultas e formas jovens do coespecífico em comparação com o milho convencional. Os resultados sugerem que, o fato de o milho Bt expressar a toxina inseticida Cry 1F, não interfere na indução de defesa direta pelo ácaro-rajado T. urticae quando comparado com plantas de milho convencional. EDUFU2019-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4231710.14393/BJ-v35n3a2019-42317Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2019): May/June; 903-909Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 3 (2019): May/June; 903-9091981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317/26127Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Paula Daiana de Paulo, Marcos Antônio Matielo Fadini, Cidália Gabriela Santos Marinho, Simone Martins Mendeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Paulo, Paula DaianaFadini, Marcos Antônio MatieloMarinho, Cidália Gabriela SantosMendes, Simone Martins2022-02-01T15:44:02Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42317Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-01T15:44:02Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants Defesa direta elicitada por Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) em milho Bt |
title |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants |
spellingShingle |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants de Paulo, Paula Daiana Plant resistance Zea mays genetically modified organisms mite Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants |
title_full |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants |
title_fullStr |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants |
title_sort |
Direct defense elicited by Tetranychus urticae koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Bt maize plants |
author |
de Paulo, Paula Daiana |
author_facet |
de Paulo, Paula Daiana Fadini, Marcos Antônio Matielo Marinho, Cidália Gabriela Santos Mendes, Simone Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fadini, Marcos Antônio Matielo Marinho, Cidália Gabriela Santos Mendes, Simone Martins |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Paulo, Paula Daiana Fadini, Marcos Antônio Matielo Marinho, Cidália Gabriela Santos Mendes, Simone Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Plant resistance Zea mays genetically modified organisms mite Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Plant resistance Zea mays genetically modified organisms mite Agricultural Sciences |
description |
Direct and indirect induced defense mechanisms against herbivores can be manifested in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Furthermore, there are constitutive defenses in which plants continuously express resistance traces. In recent decades has increased the production of transgenic maize plants that constitutively express proteins with insecticide action (Bt maize). The increase of the use of transgenic maize cultivars with the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) gene demand studies that evaluate the impacts caused by this technology on plant defense mechanisms and their impact on non-targeted organisms, as the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). We tested the hypothesis that Bt maize plants (expressing Cry1F protein) would be capable of inducing direct defenses to T. urticae after being attacked by these mites. Thus, we used plants of a commercial maize hybrid (30F35 Hx - expressing Cry1F protein) and plants of its respective non-Bt isogenic line (control). We compared the survival and reproductive performances of T. urticae on plants of both lines that were previously infested with conspecifics and on plants that did not suffer pre-infestations. The previous infestation of maize plants by T. urticae did not impacted the survival and reproductive abilities of adult and immature forms of the conspecific in both genotypes. These results suggest that, Bt maize expressing the Cry1F insecticidal protein, does not interfere in the induction of direct defense by the T. urticae when compared with conventional maize plants. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317 10.14393/BJ-v35n3a2019-42317 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v35n3a2019-42317 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42317/26127 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2019): May/June; 903-909 Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 3 (2019): May/June; 903-909 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069080316870656 |