Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Naves, Sinara Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Mendes-Rodrigues, Clesnan, Felice, Rosângela de Oliveira, Gomes, Fabíola Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/41797
Resumo: The patient’s in-hospital transport is an activity that must be performed with safety and quality and involves considerable risks, especially for surgical patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy or not of transport of surgical patients from inpatient units to surgical centers and vice-versa. The transport and patient profile, the nursing workload, the professionals and conditions involved were assessed for each patient (or transport), and subsequently the transports were evaluated as inadequate (some non-conformity) or adequate. The transport was inadequate in 39.3% of the evaluations. The most common non-conformities were the lack of knowledge of the transport at the patient’s destination, incorrect documents, patient alone during the route, and absence of health professional during transport (when necessary). In this institution and in the period evaluated, the transport was mainly run by porter. Patients in rout to inpatient units have higher frequency of inadequate transport, mainly because of lack of communication with the destination unit. The increase in workload, evaluated by the Santos Score, also increased the risk of having inappropriate transport (OR = 1.21, CI95%: 1.08-1.16), and when the patients were grouped in minimal care versus non-minimal care, the latter also showed higher risk of inadequate transport. When the transports were evaluated separately by route, patients going to surgical centers had a higher risk when the Santos Score increased (OR = 1.168, CI95%: 1.07-1.27), and patients going to inpatient units had a lower risk when the Santos Score increased (OR = 0.605, CI95%: 0.46-0.80). In the last case, patients with a high workload were also accompanied by health professionals. The presence of a health professional when the patient was going to an inpatient unit also decreased the risk of inadequate transport (OR = 0.011, CI95%: 0.002-0.070). The patient returning to their origin unit showed more transport non-conformities. Perhaps the reason is the discredit attributed to risk in these patients once the surgical problem was solved. Thus, it is a fact that the patient nursing workload and the route of the transport were effective in predicting the risk of inadequate transport, being of great potential for practical use.
id UFU-14_e1c943919745bf9b3a5d3d2ec4302572
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/41797
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in BrazilIndo e vindo de um centro cirúrgico, a avaliação dos riscos no transporte de pacientes em um hospital universitário do Brasilpatient transportpatient safetysurgical centerin-hospital transport.Health sciencesThe patient’s in-hospital transport is an activity that must be performed with safety and quality and involves considerable risks, especially for surgical patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy or not of transport of surgical patients from inpatient units to surgical centers and vice-versa. The transport and patient profile, the nursing workload, the professionals and conditions involved were assessed for each patient (or transport), and subsequently the transports were evaluated as inadequate (some non-conformity) or adequate. The transport was inadequate in 39.3% of the evaluations. The most common non-conformities were the lack of knowledge of the transport at the patient’s destination, incorrect documents, patient alone during the route, and absence of health professional during transport (when necessary). In this institution and in the period evaluated, the transport was mainly run by porter. Patients in rout to inpatient units have higher frequency of inadequate transport, mainly because of lack of communication with the destination unit. The increase in workload, evaluated by the Santos Score, also increased the risk of having inappropriate transport (OR = 1.21, CI95%: 1.08-1.16), and when the patients were grouped in minimal care versus non-minimal care, the latter also showed higher risk of inadequate transport. When the transports were evaluated separately by route, patients going to surgical centers had a higher risk when the Santos Score increased (OR = 1.168, CI95%: 1.07-1.27), and patients going to inpatient units had a lower risk when the Santos Score increased (OR = 0.605, CI95%: 0.46-0.80). In the last case, patients with a high workload were also accompanied by health professionals. The presence of a health professional when the patient was going to an inpatient unit also decreased the risk of inadequate transport (OR = 0.011, CI95%: 0.002-0.070). The patient returning to their origin unit showed more transport non-conformities. Perhaps the reason is the discredit attributed to risk in these patients once the surgical problem was solved. Thus, it is a fact that the patient nursing workload and the route of the transport were effective in predicting the risk of inadequate transport, being of great potential for practical use.O transporte hospitalar do paciente é uma atividade que deve ser realizada com segurança e qualidade e envolve riscos consideráveis, especialmente em pacientes cirúrgicos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a adequação ou não do transporte de pacientes cirúrgicos da unidade de internação para o centro cirúrgico e vice-versa. O perfil, a carga de trabalho em enfermagem, os profissionais envolvidos no transporte foram avaliados para a cada transporte, então os transportes foram avaliados como inadequados (quando ocorreu qualquer não conformidade) ou não. O transporte foi inadequado em 39,3% das avaliações; as não-conformidades mais comuns foram o desconhecimento do transporte no destino, documentos incorretos, paciente sozinho durante a rota, e a ausência do profissional da saúde (quando necessário). Nesta instituição e no período avaliado, o transporte era principalmente realizado por maqueiros. Pacientes com destino a unidades de internação têm maior frequência de transporte inadequado, principalmente por nenhuma comunicação. Sobre a carga de trabalho, avaliada pela pontuação de Santos, com a carga de trabalho aumentando o risco de ter o transporte inadequado também aumentou (Odds Ratio, OR = 1,21; IC95%: 1,08-1,16), e quando os pacientes foram agrupados em cuidados mínimos versus cuidado não mínimos, os últimos também mostram maior risco de transporte inadequado. Quando os transportes foram avaliados separadamente por rota, o paciente que vai para o centro cirúrgico tem maior risco quando o Score de Santos aumenta (OR = 1,168; IC95%: 1,07-1,27), e os pacientes que vão para a unidade de internação tem menor risco quando o Score de Santos aumenta (OR = 0,605; IC95%: 0,46-0,80). Pacientes no último caso, quando tem alta carga de trabalho também foram acompanhados por profissionais de saúde. A presença de profissionais de saúde quando o paciente vai para a unidade de internação também diminuem o risco (OR = 0,11; IC95%: 0,002-0,07). Quando os pacientes retornam às suas unidades mostram mais riscos de transporte e não-conformidades, talvez a razão é o descrédito atribuído ao risco nesses pacientes, uma vez que o problema cirúrgico foi resolvido. Assim, é fato que a carga de trabalho de enfermagem e a rota do transporte do paciente foram eficaz na predição do risco de transporte inadequado, sendo que apresentam grande potencial para uso prático.EDUFU2020-02-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4179710.14393/BJ-v36n2a2020-41797Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Mar./Apr.; 663-671Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 2 (2020): Mar./Abr; 663-6711981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/41797/28122Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2020 Sinara Ferreira Naves, Clesnan Mendes-Rodrigues, Rosângela de Oliveira Felice, Fabíola Alves Gomeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNaves, Sinara FerreiraMendes-Rodrigues, ClesnanFelice, Rosângela de OliveiraGomes, Fabíola Alves2022-01-11T21:30:51Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/41797Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-11T21:30:51Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil
Indo e vindo de um centro cirúrgico, a avaliação dos riscos no transporte de pacientes em um hospital universitário do Brasil
title Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil
spellingShingle Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil
Naves, Sinara Ferreira
patient transport
patient safety
surgical center
in-hospital transport.
Health sciences
title_short Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil
title_full Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil
title_fullStr Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil
title_sort Coming and going to a surgical center, the evaluation of risks in transport of patients in a university hospital in Brazil
author Naves, Sinara Ferreira
author_facet Naves, Sinara Ferreira
Mendes-Rodrigues, Clesnan
Felice, Rosângela de Oliveira
Gomes, Fabíola Alves
author_role author
author2 Mendes-Rodrigues, Clesnan
Felice, Rosângela de Oliveira
Gomes, Fabíola Alves
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Naves, Sinara Ferreira
Mendes-Rodrigues, Clesnan
Felice, Rosângela de Oliveira
Gomes, Fabíola Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv patient transport
patient safety
surgical center
in-hospital transport.
Health sciences
topic patient transport
patient safety
surgical center
in-hospital transport.
Health sciences
description The patient’s in-hospital transport is an activity that must be performed with safety and quality and involves considerable risks, especially for surgical patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy or not of transport of surgical patients from inpatient units to surgical centers and vice-versa. The transport and patient profile, the nursing workload, the professionals and conditions involved were assessed for each patient (or transport), and subsequently the transports were evaluated as inadequate (some non-conformity) or adequate. The transport was inadequate in 39.3% of the evaluations. The most common non-conformities were the lack of knowledge of the transport at the patient’s destination, incorrect documents, patient alone during the route, and absence of health professional during transport (when necessary). In this institution and in the period evaluated, the transport was mainly run by porter. Patients in rout to inpatient units have higher frequency of inadequate transport, mainly because of lack of communication with the destination unit. The increase in workload, evaluated by the Santos Score, also increased the risk of having inappropriate transport (OR = 1.21, CI95%: 1.08-1.16), and when the patients were grouped in minimal care versus non-minimal care, the latter also showed higher risk of inadequate transport. When the transports were evaluated separately by route, patients going to surgical centers had a higher risk when the Santos Score increased (OR = 1.168, CI95%: 1.07-1.27), and patients going to inpatient units had a lower risk when the Santos Score increased (OR = 0.605, CI95%: 0.46-0.80). In the last case, patients with a high workload were also accompanied by health professionals. The presence of a health professional when the patient was going to an inpatient unit also decreased the risk of inadequate transport (OR = 0.011, CI95%: 0.002-0.070). The patient returning to their origin unit showed more transport non-conformities. Perhaps the reason is the discredit attributed to risk in these patients once the surgical problem was solved. Thus, it is a fact that the patient nursing workload and the route of the transport were effective in predicting the risk of inadequate transport, being of great potential for practical use.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/41797
10.14393/BJ-v36n2a2020-41797
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/41797
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n2a2020-41797
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/41797/28122
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Mar./Apr.; 663-671
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 2 (2020): Mar./Abr; 663-671
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069079562944512