Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33843 |
Resumo: | : With the arrival of new early genotypes and high nutritive value and productive potential, millet has been gaining prominence in recent years for the production of silage, and it promises lower costs of production. Thus, the consortium of millet with tropical forages can increase the production of silage, providing more food to be used in the offseason, where there is low availability of forage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the dry mass production, fermentative characteristics and chemical-bromatological of pearl millet silage and Paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems in the second cropping season. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks with four replicates. The treatments consisted of silage of the following forage systems: monocropped pearl millet, monocropped Paiaguas palisadegrass, pearl millet intercropped in rows with Paiaguas palisadegrass, pearl millet intercropped inter-row with Paiaguas palisadegrass, and pearl millet oversown and intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass (totaling 20 experimental plots). The consortium of pearl millet with Paiaguas palisadegrass contributed to raise the dry matter contents of the silages, except in the system using the overgrowth. Pearl millet silages monocropped and intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass presented reductions in pH and ammoniacal nitrogen values as well as favor lactic fermentation. Pearl millet monocropped and intercropped silage exhibited better fermentative and bromatological characteristics than silage obtained from monocropped Paiaguas palisadegrass. Therefore, creating silage from intercropped forages provides an interesting supplemental roughage option that can be used during the offseason for animal feeding. |
id |
UFU-14_e247966c8ba36564e121797068e929d1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/33843 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems Produção e qualidade da silagem de milheto e capim-paiaguás em monocultuvo e consorciado em diferentes sistemas forrageirosBrachiaria brizanthaFermentative characteristicsBromatological compositionPennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.Agricultural Sciences: With the arrival of new early genotypes and high nutritive value and productive potential, millet has been gaining prominence in recent years for the production of silage, and it promises lower costs of production. Thus, the consortium of millet with tropical forages can increase the production of silage, providing more food to be used in the offseason, where there is low availability of forage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the dry mass production, fermentative characteristics and chemical-bromatological of pearl millet silage and Paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems in the second cropping season. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks with four replicates. The treatments consisted of silage of the following forage systems: monocropped pearl millet, monocropped Paiaguas palisadegrass, pearl millet intercropped in rows with Paiaguas palisadegrass, pearl millet intercropped inter-row with Paiaguas palisadegrass, and pearl millet oversown and intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass (totaling 20 experimental plots). The consortium of pearl millet with Paiaguas palisadegrass contributed to raise the dry matter contents of the silages, except in the system using the overgrowth. Pearl millet silages monocropped and intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass presented reductions in pH and ammoniacal nitrogen values as well as favor lactic fermentation. Pearl millet monocropped and intercropped silage exhibited better fermentative and bromatological characteristics than silage obtained from monocropped Paiaguas palisadegrass. Therefore, creating silage from intercropped forages provides an interesting supplemental roughage option that can be used during the offseason for animal feeding.Com a chegada de novos genótipos precoces e de alto valor nutritivo e potencial produtivo, o milheto vem ganhando destaque nos últimos anos para a produção de silagens, com menor custo de produção. Com isso, o consórcio do milheto com forrageiras tropicais, pode aumentar a produção da silagem, proporcionando maior quantidade de alimento para ser utilizado na entressafra, onde se tem baixa disponibilidade de forragem. Sendo assim, objetivou-se avaliar a produção de massa seca, características fermentativas e a composição químico-bromatológica da silagem de milheto e capim-paiaguás em monocultivo e consorciado em diferentes sistemas forrageiros, na safrinha. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi em blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos da silagem dos seguintes sistemas forrageiros: milheto em monocultivo, capim-paiaguás em monocultivo, milheto consorciado com capim-paiaguás na linha, milheto consorciado com capim-paiaguás na entrelinha e milheto consorciado com capimpaiaguás na sobressemeadura, totalizando 20 silos experimentais. O consórcio do milheto com capim-paiaguás contribuiu para elevar os teores de matéria seca das silagens, exceto, no sistema utilizando a sobressemeadura. As silagens de milheto em monocultivo e consorciadas com capim-paiaguás apresentaram reduções nos valores de pH e nitrogênio amoniacal, bem como, favorecem a fermentação lática. As silagens de milheto em monocultivo e consorciadas apresentaram melhores características fermentativas e bromatológicas quando comparadas com silagem de capim-paiaguás em monocultivo. Portanto, silagens produzidas nos sistemas consorciados constitui interessante opção de volumosos suplementar para alimentação dos animais no período de entressafra. EDUFU2018-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3384310.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-33843Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 34 No. 2 (2018): Mar./Apr.; 357-367Bioscience Journal ; v. 34 n. 2 (2018): Mar./Apr.; 357-3671981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33843/21953Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2018 Raoni Ribeiro Guedes Fonseca Costa, Kátia Aparecida de Pinho Costa, Wender Ferreira de Souza, Patrícia Soares Epifanio, Charles Barbosa Santos, Jessika Torres da Silva, Suelen Soares Oliveirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Raoni Ribeiro Guedes FonsecaCosta, Kátia Aparecida de Pinhode Souza, Wender FerreiraEpifanio, Patrícia SoaresSantos, Charles Barbosada Silva, Jessika TorresOliveira, Suelen Soares2022-02-15T17:46:52Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/33843Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-15T17:46:52Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems Produção e qualidade da silagem de milheto e capim-paiaguás em monocultuvo e consorciado em diferentes sistemas forrageiros |
title |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems |
spellingShingle |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems Costa, Raoni Ribeiro Guedes Fonseca Brachiaria brizantha Fermentative characteristics Bromatological composition Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems |
title_full |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems |
title_fullStr |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems |
title_sort |
Production and quality of silages pearl millet and paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems |
author |
Costa, Raoni Ribeiro Guedes Fonseca |
author_facet |
Costa, Raoni Ribeiro Guedes Fonseca Costa, Kátia Aparecida de Pinho de Souza, Wender Ferreira Epifanio, Patrícia Soares Santos, Charles Barbosa da Silva, Jessika Torres Oliveira, Suelen Soares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Kátia Aparecida de Pinho de Souza, Wender Ferreira Epifanio, Patrícia Soares Santos, Charles Barbosa da Silva, Jessika Torres Oliveira, Suelen Soares |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Raoni Ribeiro Guedes Fonseca Costa, Kátia Aparecida de Pinho de Souza, Wender Ferreira Epifanio, Patrícia Soares Santos, Charles Barbosa da Silva, Jessika Torres Oliveira, Suelen Soares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brachiaria brizantha Fermentative characteristics Bromatological composition Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Brachiaria brizantha Fermentative characteristics Bromatological composition Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Agricultural Sciences |
description |
: With the arrival of new early genotypes and high nutritive value and productive potential, millet has been gaining prominence in recent years for the production of silage, and it promises lower costs of production. Thus, the consortium of millet with tropical forages can increase the production of silage, providing more food to be used in the offseason, where there is low availability of forage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the dry mass production, fermentative characteristics and chemical-bromatological of pearl millet silage and Paiaguas palisadegrass in monocropping and intercropping in different forage systems in the second cropping season. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks with four replicates. The treatments consisted of silage of the following forage systems: monocropped pearl millet, monocropped Paiaguas palisadegrass, pearl millet intercropped in rows with Paiaguas palisadegrass, pearl millet intercropped inter-row with Paiaguas palisadegrass, and pearl millet oversown and intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass (totaling 20 experimental plots). The consortium of pearl millet with Paiaguas palisadegrass contributed to raise the dry matter contents of the silages, except in the system using the overgrowth. Pearl millet silages monocropped and intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass presented reductions in pH and ammoniacal nitrogen values as well as favor lactic fermentation. Pearl millet monocropped and intercropped silage exhibited better fermentative and bromatological characteristics than silage obtained from monocropped Paiaguas palisadegrass. Therefore, creating silage from intercropped forages provides an interesting supplemental roughage option that can be used during the offseason for animal feeding. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33843 10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-33843 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33843 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-33843 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/33843/21953 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 34 No. 2 (2018): Mar./Apr.; 357-367 Bioscience Journal ; v. 34 n. 2 (2018): Mar./Apr.; 357-367 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069076957233152 |