Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bioscience journal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42088 |
Resumo: | Among the pests that attack the maize, the maize leafhopper, which causes direct damages by sap-sucking and indirect ones, stands out as being a vector of pathogens and viruses, and can cause losses of up to 100% of the production. An alternative to improve the chemical control of this pest is the use of electrostatic spraying technology. However, there is no research support. This study aimed to evaluate the deposition of spray in the maize crop and the effectiveness in the chemical control of the maize leafhopper, using the electrostatic spraying system, at different application rates, compared to the conventional spraying system. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with five treatments, in a 2x2 + 2 factorial scheme: presence or absence of electrostatic spraying system, two application rates (35 and 50 L ha-1), an additional treatment using a hydraulic spray nozzle and a rate of 100 L ha-1, and other additional treatment without the application of insecticide, in order to support the study of pest infestation. Each treatment consisted of eight replicates, in which the spray deposition in the maize canopy and the efficiency in the control were evaluated. For the insecticide applications, a boom sprayer with induction electrostatic spraying system was used with indirect electrification. To evaluate the deposition, the Brilliant Blue FCF marker was added to the spray to be detected by absorbance in spectrophotometry. For the biological efficacy of the maize leafhopper, the insecticide composed of thiamethoxam and lambda-cyhalothrin was used compared with the control without the application. There was a significant increase in the spray deposition, both in the upper and lower maize leaves, with the use of electrostatic spray technology compared to the conventional spray system. The control of the maize leafhopper was also superior. The electrostatic spraying also made it possible to reduce the application rate by approximately three times in relation to that used in conventional hydraulic spraying. |
id |
UFU-14_fa0349de8a3c8cf1e89ea9f638053167 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42088 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-14 |
network_name_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic sprayingControle de Dalbulus maidis na cultura do milho com pulverização eletrostáticaApplication technologySprayPesticide.Agricultural Sciences Among the pests that attack the maize, the maize leafhopper, which causes direct damages by sap-sucking and indirect ones, stands out as being a vector of pathogens and viruses, and can cause losses of up to 100% of the production. An alternative to improve the chemical control of this pest is the use of electrostatic spraying technology. However, there is no research support. This study aimed to evaluate the deposition of spray in the maize crop and the effectiveness in the chemical control of the maize leafhopper, using the electrostatic spraying system, at different application rates, compared to the conventional spraying system. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with five treatments, in a 2x2 + 2 factorial scheme: presence or absence of electrostatic spraying system, two application rates (35 and 50 L ha-1), an additional treatment using a hydraulic spray nozzle and a rate of 100 L ha-1, and other additional treatment without the application of insecticide, in order to support the study of pest infestation. Each treatment consisted of eight replicates, in which the spray deposition in the maize canopy and the efficiency in the control were evaluated. For the insecticide applications, a boom sprayer with induction electrostatic spraying system was used with indirect electrification. To evaluate the deposition, the Brilliant Blue FCF marker was added to the spray to be detected by absorbance in spectrophotometry. For the biological efficacy of the maize leafhopper, the insecticide composed of thiamethoxam and lambda-cyhalothrin was used compared with the control without the application. There was a significant increase in the spray deposition, both in the upper and lower maize leaves, with the use of electrostatic spray technology compared to the conventional spray system. The control of the maize leafhopper was also superior. The electrostatic spraying also made it possible to reduce the application rate by approximately three times in relation to that used in conventional hydraulic spraying.Dentre as pragas que atacam a cultura do milho, atualmente destaca-se a cigarrinha do milho, causadora de danos diretos pela sucção de seiva e indiretos por ser um vetor de patógenos e vírus, podendo causar perdas de até 100% da produção. Uma alternativa para melhorar o controle químico desta praga é o uso da tecnologia de pulverização eletrostática, no entanto, ainda sem o devido respaldo da pesquisa. Esse trabalho objetivou avaliar a deposição de calda e a eficácia no controle da cigarrinha do milho, utilizando o sistema de pulverização eletrostática, comparado ao sistema convencional, em diferentes taxas de aplicação. O experimento foi conduzido no delineamento de blocos casualizados com cinco tratamentos, em esquema fatorial 2x2+2: presença ou ausência de sistema de pulverização eletrostático, duas taxas de aplicação (35 e 50 L ha-1), um tratamento adicional, empregando ponta de pulverização hidráulica e taxa de 100 L ha-1, e outro tratamento adicional sem aplicação de inseticida, com intuito de embasar o estudo de infestação da praga. Cada tratamento constou de oito repetições, nas quais foram avaliadas as deposições de calda e a eficácia no controle. Para as aplicações do inseticida, foi utilizado um pulverizador de barra com sistema de pulverização eletrostática por indução com eletrificação indireta. Para a avaliação da deposição, adicionou-se à calda o marcador Azul Brilhante para ser detectado por absorbância em espectrofotometria. Para a avaliação de eficácia biológica da cigarrinha do milho, foi utilizado o inseticida composto por tiametoxam e lambda-cialotrina, comparando com a testemunha sem aplicação. Houve um incremento significativo na deposição de calda, tanto nas folhas superiores quanto nas folhas inferiores do milho, com o uso da tecnologia de pulverização eletrostática comparada ao sistema de pulverização convencional. O controle fitossanitário da cigarrinha do milho também se mostrou superior. A pulverização eletrostática possibilitou ainda a redução da taxa de aplicação em aproximadamente três vezes em relação à utilizada na pulverização hidráulica convencional.EDUFU2019-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4208810.14393/BJ-v35n6a2019-42088Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 6 (2019): Nov./Dec.; 1780-1788Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 6 (2019): Nov./Dec.; 1780-17881981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42088/27457Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Rodrigo Santos Marques, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da Cunha, Guilherme Sousa Alves, Thales Cassemiro Alves, Sérgio Macedo Silva, César Henrique Souza Zandonadihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Rodrigo SantosRodrigues da Cunha, João Paulo ArantesAlves, Guilherme SousaAlves, Thales CassemiroSilva, Sérgio MacedoZandonadi, César Henrique Souza2022-01-24T00:12:28Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/42088Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-01-24T00:12:28Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying Controle de Dalbulus maidis na cultura do milho com pulverização eletrostática |
title |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying |
spellingShingle |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying Marques, Rodrigo Santos Application technology Spray Pesticide. Agricultural Sciences |
title_short |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying |
title_full |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying |
title_fullStr |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying |
title_full_unstemmed |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying |
title_sort |
Control of Dalbulus maidis in maize crop with electrostatic spraying |
author |
Marques, Rodrigo Santos |
author_facet |
Marques, Rodrigo Santos Rodrigues da Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Alves, Guilherme Sousa Alves, Thales Cassemiro Silva, Sérgio Macedo Zandonadi, César Henrique Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues da Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Alves, Guilherme Sousa Alves, Thales Cassemiro Silva, Sérgio Macedo Zandonadi, César Henrique Souza |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Rodrigo Santos Rodrigues da Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Alves, Guilherme Sousa Alves, Thales Cassemiro Silva, Sérgio Macedo Zandonadi, César Henrique Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Application technology Spray Pesticide. Agricultural Sciences |
topic |
Application technology Spray Pesticide. Agricultural Sciences |
description |
Among the pests that attack the maize, the maize leafhopper, which causes direct damages by sap-sucking and indirect ones, stands out as being a vector of pathogens and viruses, and can cause losses of up to 100% of the production. An alternative to improve the chemical control of this pest is the use of electrostatic spraying technology. However, there is no research support. This study aimed to evaluate the deposition of spray in the maize crop and the effectiveness in the chemical control of the maize leafhopper, using the electrostatic spraying system, at different application rates, compared to the conventional spraying system. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with five treatments, in a 2x2 + 2 factorial scheme: presence or absence of electrostatic spraying system, two application rates (35 and 50 L ha-1), an additional treatment using a hydraulic spray nozzle and a rate of 100 L ha-1, and other additional treatment without the application of insecticide, in order to support the study of pest infestation. Each treatment consisted of eight replicates, in which the spray deposition in the maize canopy and the efficiency in the control were evaluated. For the insecticide applications, a boom sprayer with induction electrostatic spraying system was used with indirect electrification. To evaluate the deposition, the Brilliant Blue FCF marker was added to the spray to be detected by absorbance in spectrophotometry. For the biological efficacy of the maize leafhopper, the insecticide composed of thiamethoxam and lambda-cyhalothrin was used compared with the control without the application. There was a significant increase in the spray deposition, both in the upper and lower maize leaves, with the use of electrostatic spray technology compared to the conventional spray system. The control of the maize leafhopper was also superior. The electrostatic spraying also made it possible to reduce the application rate by approximately three times in relation to that used in conventional hydraulic spraying. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42088 10.14393/BJ-v35n6a2019-42088 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42088 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/BJ-v35n6a2019-42088 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/42088/27457 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 35 No. 6 (2019): Nov./Dec.; 1780-1788 Bioscience Journal ; v. 35 n. 6 (2019): Nov./Dec.; 1780-1788 1981-3163 reponame:Bioscience journal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
collection |
Bioscience journal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biosciencej@ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069079732813824 |