Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Guilherme Sousa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da, Landim, Thiago Nunes, Silva, Sérgio Macedo, Alves, Thales Cassemiro, Goulart, Caio Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47866
Resumo: Weed plants are one of main factors that affect the production of oilseed crops. Their management have been based on chemical control with herbicides, like glyphosate and 2,4-D, due to usefulness and efficiency of applications. However, their use must be managed correctly to mitigate the spray drift. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate efficacy and spray drift from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants. The drift evaluation of herbicide solutions was conducted in a split-plot arranged in a randomized block design with five replications. Main plots consisted of three herbicide solutions at 150 L ha-1 (glyphosate + 2,4-D, glyphosate + 2,4-D + sodium lauryl ether sulphate, and glyphosate + 2,4-D + fatty acid esters). Sub-plots consisted of five downwind distances (1 to 10 m) from the sprayed area. It was used a fluorecent tracer and drift colectors. The efficacy trial was performed in a randomized block design with four replications in a 3 x 2 factorial scheme, being the same herbicide solutions and two carrier volumes (75 and 150 L ha-1). Droplet spectrum and weed depositon were evaluated and physicochemical properties of the herbicide solutions were characterized. Glyphosate + 2,4-D with or without adjuvants, sprayed using 75 or 150 L ha-1, resulted in similar deposition of tracer on weeds and their control. Those herbicides associated or not with sodium lauryl ether sulphate and fatty acid esters produce similar droplet spectrum and deposition of tracer on drift collectors.
id UFU-14_fa48198f6402fcefb959e89626582688
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/47866
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvantsDeriva e eficácia de aplicações de glifosate e 2,4-D com adjuvantesAdditives.Herbicide.Application technology.Agricultural SciencesAdjuvantes.Herbicida.Tecnologia de aplicação.Weed plants are one of main factors that affect the production of oilseed crops. Their management have been based on chemical control with herbicides, like glyphosate and 2,4-D, due to usefulness and efficiency of applications. However, their use must be managed correctly to mitigate the spray drift. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate efficacy and spray drift from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants. The drift evaluation of herbicide solutions was conducted in a split-plot arranged in a randomized block design with five replications. Main plots consisted of three herbicide solutions at 150 L ha-1 (glyphosate + 2,4-D, glyphosate + 2,4-D + sodium lauryl ether sulphate, and glyphosate + 2,4-D + fatty acid esters). Sub-plots consisted of five downwind distances (1 to 10 m) from the sprayed area. It was used a fluorecent tracer and drift colectors. The efficacy trial was performed in a randomized block design with four replications in a 3 x 2 factorial scheme, being the same herbicide solutions and two carrier volumes (75 and 150 L ha-1). Droplet spectrum and weed depositon were evaluated and physicochemical properties of the herbicide solutions were characterized. Glyphosate + 2,4-D with or without adjuvants, sprayed using 75 or 150 L ha-1, resulted in similar deposition of tracer on weeds and their control. Those herbicides associated or not with sodium lauryl ether sulphate and fatty acid esters produce similar droplet spectrum and deposition of tracer on drift collectors.As plantas daninhas são um dos principais fatores que afetam a produção de oleaginosas. Seu manejo tem sido baseado no controle químico com herbicidas, como o glifosato e o 2,4-D, devido ao amplo espectro de controle e eficiência das aplicações. Contudo, seu uso deve ser feito corretamente para reduzir a deriva nas pulverizações. Portanto, este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia e a deriva da pulverização a partir de aplicações de glifosato e 2,4-D em mistura com adjuvantes. A avaliação de deriva foi realizada em parcelas subdivididas em delineamento de blocos casualizados com cinco repetições. As parcelas principais consistiram de três soluções herbicidas a 150 L ha-1 (glifosato + 2,4-D, glifosato + 2,4-D + lauril éter-sulfato de sódio e glifosato + 2,4-D + ésteres de ácidos graxos). As sub-parcelas consistiram em cinco distâncias a favor do vento (1 a 10 m) da área pulverizada. Utilizou-se um traçador para ser detectado por fluorimetria e coletores de deriva. O ensaio de eficácia foi conduzido em delineamento de blocos casualizados com quatro repetições, em esquema fatorial 3 x 2, sendo as mesmas soluções herbicidas e duas taxas de aplicação (75 e 150 L ha-1). O espectro de gotas e o depósito nas plantas daninhas foram avaliados e as propriedades físico-químicas das soluções herbicidas foram caracterizadas. Glifosato + 2,4-D, com ou sem adjuvantes, pulverizados com 75 ou 150 L ha-1, resultaram em deposição similar do traçador em plantas daninhas, bem como controles equivalentes. Esses herbicidas associados ou não ao lauril éter-sulfato de sódio e aos ésteres de ácidos graxos produziram espectro de gotas e deposição do traçador em coletores de deriva semelhantes.EDUFU2020-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/4786610.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-47866Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020): May/June; 876-885Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 3 (2020): Maio/Junho; 876-8851981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47866/28630Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2020 Guilherme Sousa Alves, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da Cunha, Thiago Nunes Landim, Sérgio Macedo Silva, Thales Cassemiro Alves, Caio Silva Goularthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Guilherme SousaCunha, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues daLandim, Thiago NunesSilva, Sérgio Macedo Alves, Thales CassemiroGoulart, Caio Silva2022-06-20T12:52:32Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/47866Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-06-20T12:52:32Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants
Deriva e eficácia de aplicações de glifosate e 2,4-D com adjuvantes
title Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants
spellingShingle Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants
Alves, Guilherme Sousa
Additives.
Herbicide.
Application technology.
Agricultural Sciences
Adjuvantes.
Herbicida.
Tecnologia de aplicação.
title_short Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants
title_full Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants
title_fullStr Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants
title_full_unstemmed Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants
title_sort Spray drift and efficacy from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants
author Alves, Guilherme Sousa
author_facet Alves, Guilherme Sousa
Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da
Landim, Thiago Nunes
Silva, Sérgio Macedo
Alves, Thales Cassemiro
Goulart, Caio Silva
author_role author
author2 Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da
Landim, Thiago Nunes
Silva, Sérgio Macedo
Alves, Thales Cassemiro
Goulart, Caio Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Guilherme Sousa
Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da
Landim, Thiago Nunes
Silva, Sérgio Macedo
Alves, Thales Cassemiro
Goulart, Caio Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Additives.
Herbicide.
Application technology.
Agricultural Sciences
Adjuvantes.
Herbicida.
Tecnologia de aplicação.
topic Additives.
Herbicide.
Application technology.
Agricultural Sciences
Adjuvantes.
Herbicida.
Tecnologia de aplicação.
description Weed plants are one of main factors that affect the production of oilseed crops. Their management have been based on chemical control with herbicides, like glyphosate and 2,4-D, due to usefulness and efficiency of applications. However, their use must be managed correctly to mitigate the spray drift. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate efficacy and spray drift from glyphosate and 2,4-D applications with adjuvants. The drift evaluation of herbicide solutions was conducted in a split-plot arranged in a randomized block design with five replications. Main plots consisted of three herbicide solutions at 150 L ha-1 (glyphosate + 2,4-D, glyphosate + 2,4-D + sodium lauryl ether sulphate, and glyphosate + 2,4-D + fatty acid esters). Sub-plots consisted of five downwind distances (1 to 10 m) from the sprayed area. It was used a fluorecent tracer and drift colectors. The efficacy trial was performed in a randomized block design with four replications in a 3 x 2 factorial scheme, being the same herbicide solutions and two carrier volumes (75 and 150 L ha-1). Droplet spectrum and weed depositon were evaluated and physicochemical properties of the herbicide solutions were characterized. Glyphosate + 2,4-D with or without adjuvants, sprayed using 75 or 150 L ha-1, resulted in similar deposition of tracer on weeds and their control. Those herbicides associated or not with sodium lauryl ether sulphate and fatty acid esters produce similar droplet spectrum and deposition of tracer on drift collectors.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47866
10.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-47866
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47866
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-47866
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/47866/28630
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020): May/June; 876-885
Bioscience Journal ; v. 36 n. 3 (2020): Maio/Junho; 876-885
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069081165168640