MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistaeducaopoliticas/article/view/54014 |
Resumo: | The main objective is to reflect on whether the proposal for self-assessment (look at yourself) made through the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem) finds resonance with the reality of the students. It is based on the documental and bibliographic approach, having as its core the works of Zanchet (2003), Locco (2005), Almeida (2019) and documents related to Enem. Among the findings, it is noted that there is no curricular policy disseminated by the government in order to support the teacher and the student about the dissemination of self-analysis. Such practice, coupled with the aforementioned examination, is conducted (when there is a conduct) uncritically. It is also noted that self-assessment needs a more humanized and personal context, in contrast to the competitive and meritocratic scenario triggered by other Enem attributions. |
id |
UFU-4_6cd85d33400654cc00d7a291768eace9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/54014 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried outLa proposition de MEC pour Enem de déclencher une auto-évaluation: un projet non réaliséO Enem como instrumento de autoavaliação: um projeto não efetivado / MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried outAutoavaliaçãoEnemestudantesSelf-evaluationEnemStudentsAuto-évaluationEnemÉtudiantsThe main objective is to reflect on whether the proposal for self-assessment (look at yourself) made through the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem) finds resonance with the reality of the students. It is based on the documental and bibliographic approach, having as its core the works of Zanchet (2003), Locco (2005), Almeida (2019) and documents related to Enem. Among the findings, it is noted that there is no curricular policy disseminated by the government in order to support the teacher and the student about the dissemination of self-analysis. Such practice, coupled with the aforementioned examination, is conducted (when there is a conduct) uncritically. It is also noted that self-assessment needs a more humanized and personal context, in contrast to the competitive and meritocratic scenario triggered by other Enem attributions.L'objectif principal est de déterminer si la proposition d'auto-évaluation (regardez-vous) faite par le biais de le Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem) trouve une résonance avec la réalité des élèves. Il est basé sur l'approche documentaire et bibliographique, ayant pour noyau les travaux de Zanchet (2003), Locco (2005), Almeida (2019) et les documents liés à Enem. Parmi les constatations, il est noté qu'il n'y a pas de politique curriculaire diffusée par le gouvernement afin de soutenir l'enseignant et l'élève dans la diffusion de l'auto-analyse. Une telle pratique, associée à l'examen susmentionné, est menée (lorsqu'il y a une conduite) sans esprit critique. Il est également noté que l'auto-évaluation a besoin d'un contexte plus humanisé et personnel, contrairement au scénario compétitif et méritocratique déclenché par d'autres attributions Enem. O objetivo central visa refletir se a proposta de autoavaliação (olhar para si) feita por meio do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem) encontra ressonância com a realidade dos discentes. Apega-se ao enfoque documental e bibliográfico, tendo como cerne os trabalhos de Zanchet (2003), Locco (2005), Almeida (2019) e documentos relativos ao Enem. Dentre os achados, nota-se que não há uma política curricular difundida pelo governo a fim de embasar o professor e o aluno acerca da disseminação da autoanálise. Tal prática, aliada ao referido exame, é conduzida (quando existe condução) de modo acrítico. Constata-se também que a autoavaliação necessita de um contexto mais humanizado e pessoal, ao contrário do cenário competitivo e meritocrático desencadeado por outras atribuições do Enem. Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2020-07-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistaeducaopoliticas/article/view/5401410.14393/REPOD-v9n2a2020-54014Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020); 406-419Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2020); 406-419Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020); 406-419Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate; v. 9 n. 2 (2020); 406-4192238-8346reponame:Revista Educação e Políticas em Debateinstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistaeducaopoliticas/article/view/54014/29375Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Educação e Políticas em Debateinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Vitor Sergio2022-07-21T14:06:58Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/54014Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistaeducaopoliticasPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistaeducaopoliticas/oairevistaedupoliticas@faced.ufu.br||mvs@ufu.br|| mvieirufu@gmail.com10.143932238-83462238-8346opendoar:2022-07-21T14:06:58Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out La proposition de MEC pour Enem de déclencher une auto-évaluation: un projet non réalisé O Enem como instrumento de autoavaliação: um projeto não efetivado / MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out |
title |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out |
spellingShingle |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out Almeida, Vitor Sergio Autoavaliação Enem estudantes Self-evaluation Enem Students Auto-évaluation Enem Étudiants |
title_short |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out |
title_full |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out |
title_fullStr |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out |
title_full_unstemmed |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out |
title_sort |
MEC's proposal for Enem to trigger a self-assessment: a project not carried out |
author |
Almeida, Vitor Sergio |
author_facet |
Almeida, Vitor Sergio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Vitor Sergio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autoavaliação Enem estudantes Self-evaluation Enem Students Auto-évaluation Enem Étudiants |
topic |
Autoavaliação Enem estudantes Self-evaluation Enem Students Auto-évaluation Enem Étudiants |
description |
The main objective is to reflect on whether the proposal for self-assessment (look at yourself) made through the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem) finds resonance with the reality of the students. It is based on the documental and bibliographic approach, having as its core the works of Zanchet (2003), Locco (2005), Almeida (2019) and documents related to Enem. Among the findings, it is noted that there is no curricular policy disseminated by the government in order to support the teacher and the student about the dissemination of self-analysis. Such practice, coupled with the aforementioned examination, is conducted (when there is a conduct) uncritically. It is also noted that self-assessment needs a more humanized and personal context, in contrast to the competitive and meritocratic scenario triggered by other Enem attributions. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistaeducaopoliticas/article/view/54014 10.14393/REPOD-v9n2a2020-54014 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistaeducaopoliticas/article/view/54014 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/REPOD-v9n2a2020-54014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistaeducaopoliticas/article/view/54014/29375 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020); 406-419 Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2020); 406-419 Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020); 406-419 Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate; v. 9 n. 2 (2020); 406-419 2238-8346 reponame:Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate |
collection |
Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Educação e Políticas em Debate - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaedupoliticas@faced.ufu.br||mvs@ufu.br|| mvieirufu@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1788536118371680256 |