Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Branchi, Bruna Angela
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Sociedade & natureza (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/63868
Resumo: The need for efficient water resources management highlights the importance of discussing the watershed sustainability issue. This is a complex subject, which justifies the choice for multidimensional indexes. The aim of this paper is to discuss the assessment of watersheds’ sustainability through composite indices to detect this statistical instrument’s strengths and weaknesses. This is a descriptive, exploratory, and quantitative research. The literature review on sustainability indices and their application in hydrographic basins guided the selection of a watershed sustainability index (WSI). The dual approach that combines the criteria of the Pressure-State-Response (PER) model with the dimensions of the Hydrology-Environment-Life-Policy model (UNESCO HELP model) guided the selection of the fifteen indicators that were chosen. The WSI was used to assess the degree of sustainability of the Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí river basins during two periods in the 2010s. The analysis of the results detected a minor decrease in the index’s value, due to the Hydrology and Politics dimensions that recorded a setback in the second half of the decade under analysis. The result was not worse because of the remarkable improvement recorded in the Life dimension. This compensation is a weakness of the WSI that implicitly promotes the concept of weak sustainability. On the other hand, the selection of indicators guided by the dual approach is particularly interesting and challenging by connecting the PER criteria with the dimensions of sustainability well summarized in the HELP model.
id UFU-6_1dd61fdb1e3889b0fdddf0030028bbee
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/63868
network_acronym_str UFU-6
network_name_str Sociedade & natureza (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and ChallengesSostenibilidad de cuencas hidrográficas e índices compuestos: aplicación y retosSustentabilidade de Bacias Hidrográficas e Índices Compostos: Aplicação e DesafiosÍndices de sustentabilidade IndicadoresRecursos Hídricos Sustainability Indexes Indicators Water ResourcesThe need for efficient water resources management highlights the importance of discussing the watershed sustainability issue. This is a complex subject, which justifies the choice for multidimensional indexes. The aim of this paper is to discuss the assessment of watersheds’ sustainability through composite indices to detect this statistical instrument’s strengths and weaknesses. This is a descriptive, exploratory, and quantitative research. The literature review on sustainability indices and their application in hydrographic basins guided the selection of a watershed sustainability index (WSI). The dual approach that combines the criteria of the Pressure-State-Response (PER) model with the dimensions of the Hydrology-Environment-Life-Policy model (UNESCO HELP model) guided the selection of the fifteen indicators that were chosen. The WSI was used to assess the degree of sustainability of the Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí river basins during two periods in the 2010s. The analysis of the results detected a minor decrease in the index’s value, due to the Hydrology and Politics dimensions that recorded a setback in the second half of the decade under analysis. The result was not worse because of the remarkable improvement recorded in the Life dimension. This compensation is a weakness of the WSI that implicitly promotes the concept of weak sustainability. On the other hand, the selection of indicators guided by the dual approach is particularly interesting and challenging by connecting the PER criteria with the dimensions of sustainability well summarized in the HELP model.A necessidade de uma gestão eficiente dos recursos hídricos ressalta a importância de estudos que tratam da sustentabilidade de bacia hidrográficas. Ao mesmo tempo, a complexidade do assunto justifica a escolha de indicadores sintéticos multidimensionais. O objetivo do artigo é discutir a avaliação da sustentabilidade de bacias hidrográficas por meio de índices compostos visando identificar pontos fortes e fracos desse instrumento estatístico. Trata-se de uma pesquisa exploratória, descritiva, aplicada e com abordagem quantitativa. Por meio de uma revisão da literatura dos índices de sustentabilidade e de sua aplicação em bacias hidrográficas, foi selecionado um índice da sustentabilidade de bacias hidrográficas (WSI). A escolha dos quinze indicadores que o compõem foi orientada por uma dupla abordagem que associa os critérios do modelo Pressão-Estado-Resposta (PER) às dimensões do modelo Hidrologia-Ambiente-Vida-Política (Hidrology-Environment-Life-Policy ou modelo HELP da Unesco). O WSI foi aplicado para avaliar o grau de sustentabilidade das bacias dos rios Piracicaba, Capivari e Jundiaí, em dois intervalos da década de 2010. A análise dos resultados permite observar uma leve redução do valor do índice, imputável às dimensões Hidrologia e Política que registraram um retrocesso na segunda metade da década em análise. O resultado não foi pior pelo notável avanço registrado na dimensão Vida. Esta compensação de variações é um exemplo de fraqueza do índice que implicitamente se baseia no conceito de sustentabilidade fraca. Por outro lado, a seleção de indicadores orientados pela dupla abordagem demonstra-se particularmente interessante e desafiadora na busca de associar os critérios PER às dimensões da sustentabilidade bem resumidas no modelo HELP.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2022-05-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/6386810.14393/SN-v34-2022-63868Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2022): Sociedade & Natureza; v. 34 n. 1 (2022): 1982-45130103-1570reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUengporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/63868/33815https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/63868/33816Copyright (c) 2021 Bruna Angela Branchihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBranchi, Bruna Angela2023-04-06T20:32:29Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/63868Revistahttp://www.sociedadenatureza.ig.ufu.br/PUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/oai||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br1982-45130103-1570opendoar:2023-04-06T20:32:29Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges
Sostenibilidad de cuencas hidrográficas e índices compuestos: aplicación y retos
Sustentabilidade de Bacias Hidrográficas e Índices Compostos: Aplicação e Desafios
title Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges
spellingShingle Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges
Branchi, Bruna Angela
Índices de sustentabilidade
Indicadores
Recursos Hídricos
Sustainability Indexes
Indicators
Water Resources
title_short Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges
title_full Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges
title_fullStr Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges
title_sort Watershed Sustainability and Composite Index: Application and Challenges
author Branchi, Bruna Angela
author_facet Branchi, Bruna Angela
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Branchi, Bruna Angela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Índices de sustentabilidade
Indicadores
Recursos Hídricos
Sustainability Indexes
Indicators
Water Resources
topic Índices de sustentabilidade
Indicadores
Recursos Hídricos
Sustainability Indexes
Indicators
Water Resources
description The need for efficient water resources management highlights the importance of discussing the watershed sustainability issue. This is a complex subject, which justifies the choice for multidimensional indexes. The aim of this paper is to discuss the assessment of watersheds’ sustainability through composite indices to detect this statistical instrument’s strengths and weaknesses. This is a descriptive, exploratory, and quantitative research. The literature review on sustainability indices and their application in hydrographic basins guided the selection of a watershed sustainability index (WSI). The dual approach that combines the criteria of the Pressure-State-Response (PER) model with the dimensions of the Hydrology-Environment-Life-Policy model (UNESCO HELP model) guided the selection of the fifteen indicators that were chosen. The WSI was used to assess the degree of sustainability of the Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí river basins during two periods in the 2010s. The analysis of the results detected a minor decrease in the index’s value, due to the Hydrology and Politics dimensions that recorded a setback in the second half of the decade under analysis. The result was not worse because of the remarkable improvement recorded in the Life dimension. This compensation is a weakness of the WSI that implicitly promotes the concept of weak sustainability. On the other hand, the selection of indicators guided by the dual approach is particularly interesting and challenging by connecting the PER criteria with the dimensions of sustainability well summarized in the HELP model.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/63868
10.14393/SN-v34-2022-63868
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/63868
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/SN-v34-2022-63868
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/63868/33815
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/63868/33816
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Bruna Angela Branchi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Bruna Angela Branchi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2022):
Sociedade & Natureza; v. 34 n. 1 (2022):
1982-4513
0103-1570
reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Sociedade & natureza (Online)
collection Sociedade & natureza (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br
_version_ 1799943982913945600