ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/70437 |
Resumo: | The Ecological Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services for Biodiversity (ICMS-E) was created in 1991 as an initiative of the government of Paraná State. It is an important public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity in small municipalities that house Conservation Units. The aim of this article was to analyze whether resources from the ICMS-E, added to municipal tax revenues, improve sustainable development over time. As part of the methodological procedures, a descriptive-comparative analysis was conducted between municipalities that receive and do not receive ICMS-E. For this purpose, a sampling of the 399 municipalities that comprise Paraná State was conducted, involving 193 municipalities with a population of up to 50,000 inhabitants. The comparative analysis was based on the definition of two study groups, each constituted by 76 municipalities: one called the ICMS-E Recipient Group, municipalities that receive the ecological tax; and the Control Group, composed of those that do not receive it. The main results indicate that 19.80% of the municipalities are concentrated in the North Central mesoregion, while the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba is home to 33.45% of the population of Paraná. In relation to population loss, this factor represents 44.73% in the ICMS-E Recipient Group, while in the Control Group this number is 34.21%. In relation to the Environmental Management Function, 60.53% of the municipalities in the Recipient Group applied up to 75% of this tax to this function. It was concluded that the ICMS-E is an important incentive for the preservation of biodiversity and represents a significant increase in resources for the local governments of small municipalities. |
id |
UFU-6_d02fa21a3a687d1c87dc66aec0c9881e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/70437 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-6 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, BrazilO ICMS-Ecológico como instrumento de política pública para a preservação da biodiversidade: um estudo aplicado em pequenas cidades do Paraná, BrasilPequenas cidadesICMS-EcológicoIndicadoresDesenvolvimento SustentávelSmall citiesEcological ICMSIndicatorsSustainable DevelopmentThe Ecological Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services for Biodiversity (ICMS-E) was created in 1991 as an initiative of the government of Paraná State. It is an important public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity in small municipalities that house Conservation Units. The aim of this article was to analyze whether resources from the ICMS-E, added to municipal tax revenues, improve sustainable development over time. As part of the methodological procedures, a descriptive-comparative analysis was conducted between municipalities that receive and do not receive ICMS-E. For this purpose, a sampling of the 399 municipalities that comprise Paraná State was conducted, involving 193 municipalities with a population of up to 50,000 inhabitants. The comparative analysis was based on the definition of two study groups, each constituted by 76 municipalities: one called the ICMS-E Recipient Group, municipalities that receive the ecological tax; and the Control Group, composed of those that do not receive it. The main results indicate that 19.80% of the municipalities are concentrated in the North Central mesoregion, while the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba is home to 33.45% of the population of Paraná. In relation to population loss, this factor represents 44.73% in the ICMS-E Recipient Group, while in the Control Group this number is 34.21%. In relation to the Environmental Management Function, 60.53% of the municipalities in the Recipient Group applied up to 75% of this tax to this function. It was concluded that the ICMS-E is an important incentive for the preservation of biodiversity and represents a significant increase in resources for the local governments of small municipalities.O Imposto sobre a Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços por Biodiversidade (ICMS-E) foi criado em 1991 por iniciativa do governo do Estado do Paraná, o qual representa um importante instrumento de política pública para a preservação da Biodiversidade em pequenas cidades que abrigam Unidades de Conservação em seu território. Desta forma, o objetivo do artigo consistiu em analisar se os recursos provenientes do ICMS-Ecológico agregado às Receitas Tributárias dos Municípios incrementam o Desenvolvimento Sustentável ao longo do tempo. Como parte dos procedimentos metodológicos, foi realizada uma análise descritiva-comparativa entre os municípios que recebem e não recebem o ICMS-E. Para isto, realizou-se uma amostragem dos 399 municípios que compõem o Estado do Paraná, envolvendo 193 cidades com população de até 50.000 habitantes. A análise comparativa foi desenvolvida a partir da definição de dois grupos de estudo, um denominado Grupo Recebedores de ICMS-E formado por 76 municípios, que recebem o imposto ecológico, e o Grupo de Controle, composto por aqueles que não recebem o ICMS-E, com o mesmo quantitativo. Os principais resultados apontam que a mesorregião Norte Central concentra 19,80% dos municípios, enquanto a Região Metropolitana de Curitiba abriga 33,45% da população do Paraná. Em relação à perda populacional, esse fator representa 44,73% sobre o Grupo Recebedores de ICMS-E, enquanto no Grupo de Controle esse número é de 34,21%. Em relação à Função Gestão Ambiental, 60,53% dos municípios do Grupo Recebedores de ICMS-Ecológico aplicaram até 75% desse imposto nessa função. Concluiu-se que o ICMS-E é um importante incentivo à preservação da Biodiversidade e representa um significativo aumento de recursos para o governo loca de pequenos municípios.Universidade Federal de Uberlândia2023-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/7043710.14393/SN-v36-2024-70437Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2024): Sociedade & NaturezaSociedade & Natureza; v. 36 n. 1 (2024): Sociedade & Natureza1982-45130103-1570reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/70437/37309https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/70437/37310Copyright (c) 2023 Nelson Granados Moratta, Christian Luiz da Silva, Alain Hernández Santoyohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoratta, Nelson GranadosSilva, Christian Luiz daSantoyo, Alain Hernández2024-05-13T15:01:07Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/70437Revistahttp://www.sociedadenatureza.ig.ufu.br/PUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/oai||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br1982-45130103-1570opendoar:2024-05-13T15:01:07Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil O ICMS-Ecológico como instrumento de política pública para a preservação da biodiversidade: um estudo aplicado em pequenas cidades do Paraná, Brasil |
title |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil Moratta, Nelson Granados Pequenas cidades ICMS-Ecológico Indicadores Desenvolvimento Sustentável Small cities Ecological ICMS Indicators Sustainable Development |
title_short |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil |
title_full |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil |
title_sort |
ICMS-ecológico as a public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity: a study applied in small towns in Paraná, Brazil |
author |
Moratta, Nelson Granados |
author_facet |
Moratta, Nelson Granados Silva, Christian Luiz da Santoyo, Alain Hernández |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Christian Luiz da Santoyo, Alain Hernández |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moratta, Nelson Granados Silva, Christian Luiz da Santoyo, Alain Hernández |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pequenas cidades ICMS-Ecológico Indicadores Desenvolvimento Sustentável Small cities Ecological ICMS Indicators Sustainable Development |
topic |
Pequenas cidades ICMS-Ecológico Indicadores Desenvolvimento Sustentável Small cities Ecological ICMS Indicators Sustainable Development |
description |
The Ecological Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services for Biodiversity (ICMS-E) was created in 1991 as an initiative of the government of Paraná State. It is an important public policy instrument for the preservation of biodiversity in small municipalities that house Conservation Units. The aim of this article was to analyze whether resources from the ICMS-E, added to municipal tax revenues, improve sustainable development over time. As part of the methodological procedures, a descriptive-comparative analysis was conducted between municipalities that receive and do not receive ICMS-E. For this purpose, a sampling of the 399 municipalities that comprise Paraná State was conducted, involving 193 municipalities with a population of up to 50,000 inhabitants. The comparative analysis was based on the definition of two study groups, each constituted by 76 municipalities: one called the ICMS-E Recipient Group, municipalities that receive the ecological tax; and the Control Group, composed of those that do not receive it. The main results indicate that 19.80% of the municipalities are concentrated in the North Central mesoregion, while the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba is home to 33.45% of the population of Paraná. In relation to population loss, this factor represents 44.73% in the ICMS-E Recipient Group, while in the Control Group this number is 34.21%. In relation to the Environmental Management Function, 60.53% of the municipalities in the Recipient Group applied up to 75% of this tax to this function. It was concluded that the ICMS-E is an important incentive for the preservation of biodiversity and represents a significant increase in resources for the local governments of small municipalities. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/70437 10.14393/SN-v36-2024-70437 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/70437 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/SN-v36-2024-70437 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/70437/37309 https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/70437/37310 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Nelson Granados Moratta, Christian Luiz da Silva, Alain Hernández Santoyo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Nelson Granados Moratta, Christian Luiz da Silva, Alain Hernández Santoyo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade & Natureza; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2024): Sociedade & Natureza Sociedade & Natureza; v. 36 n. 1 (2024): Sociedade & Natureza 1982-4513 0103-1570 reponame:Sociedade & natureza (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
collection |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade & natureza (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sociedade.natureza.ufu@gmail.com|| lucianamelo@ufu.br |
_version_ |
1799943977471836160 |