A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFU |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/15572 https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2012.338 |
Resumo: | This dissertation examines some points made by philosophers such as Peter Singer and Jeff McMahan about the morality of killing. Respectively, in the books Practical Ethics (2006) and Ethics in killing (2011), the authors delimit and justify the ethical to respect and / or the right to life, both of people as of non-human animals. According to Singer (2006), the only beings with selfawareness, self-control, sense of past and future, must have the right to life, thus including some non-human animals in the moral sphere. McMahan (2011) endorse the criticism of Singer about the notion of sanctity of life, but he does not include the moral sphere as does Singer. Peter Singer and McMahan elect respectively the principles of equal consideration of interests and approach of time-relative interest as guides for action to regulate morality in killing act. Notably the ethical approach of Singer enables us to reach the best consequences in a more clear and objective. McMahan, on the other hand, offer us an alternative relevant to judging not paradigmatic cases of killing. Finally, the authors' search is for arguments and principles that can answer the most pressing issues related to life, although we can identify theoretical differences between the three authors, in fact all are aimed at satisfying the interests of individuals and the search for the best consequences on issues related to abortion and euthanasia. It is the case to understand the relevance of the assumption of the sanctity of life to regulate ethical principles that can regulate actions related to such issues. |
id |
UFU_30ac7aeca56b3aa2fba804cffeaf8232 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufu.br:123456789/15572 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFU |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vidaSinger, Peter, 1946-McMahan, Jeff, 1954-BioéticaÉticaSingerMcMahanValor da vidaSantidadeValue of lifeSanctityCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAThis dissertation examines some points made by philosophers such as Peter Singer and Jeff McMahan about the morality of killing. Respectively, in the books Practical Ethics (2006) and Ethics in killing (2011), the authors delimit and justify the ethical to respect and / or the right to life, both of people as of non-human animals. According to Singer (2006), the only beings with selfawareness, self-control, sense of past and future, must have the right to life, thus including some non-human animals in the moral sphere. McMahan (2011) endorse the criticism of Singer about the notion of sanctity of life, but he does not include the moral sphere as does Singer. Peter Singer and McMahan elect respectively the principles of equal consideration of interests and approach of time-relative interest as guides for action to regulate morality in killing act. Notably the ethical approach of Singer enables us to reach the best consequences in a more clear and objective. McMahan, on the other hand, offer us an alternative relevant to judging not paradigmatic cases of killing. Finally, the authors' search is for arguments and principles that can answer the most pressing issues related to life, although we can identify theoretical differences between the three authors, in fact all are aimed at satisfying the interests of individuals and the search for the best consequences on issues related to abortion and euthanasia. It is the case to understand the relevance of the assumption of the sanctity of life to regulate ethical principles that can regulate actions related to such issues.Mestre em FilosofiaO presente trabalho de dissertação analisa algumas colocações feitas pelos filósofos como Peter Singer e Jeff McMahan a respeito da moralidade do ato de matar. Respectivamente, nos livros Ética Prática (2006) e A ética no ato de matar (2011), os autores delimitam e justificam os pressupostos éticos para o respeito e/ou direito à vida, tanto das pessoas quanto dos animais nãohumanos. Para Singer (2006), apenas os seres dotados de autoconsciência, autocontrole, senso de passado e futuro, possuem direito à vida, incluindo assim alguns animais não-humanos na esfera moral. McMahan (2011) endossa a crítica de Singer a respeito da noção de santidade da vida, contudo não incluindo os animais à esfera moral tal como faz Singer. Peter Singer e McMahan elegem respectivamente os princípios da igual consideração de interesses e abordagem do interesse temporalizado como guias de ação para regular a moralidade no ato matar. Notadamente a abordagem ética de Singer possibilita-nos chegar às melhores consequências de uma maneira mais clara e objetiva. Por outro lado, McMahan, por sua fez, oferece-nos uma alternativa pertinente para julgarmos os casos não paradigmáticos do ato de tirar a vida. Por fim, a busca dos autores é por argumentos e princípios que possam responder as questões mais urgentes relacionados à vida, embora possamos identificar divergências teóricas entre os autores, na verdade todos têm como finalidade a satisfação dos interesses dos indivíduos e a busca pelas melhores consequências para as questões relacionadas ao aborto e à eutanásia. Será o caso compreendermos a relevância do pressuposto da santidade da vida para regular princípios éticos capazes de regular ações que dizem respeito a tais questões.Universidade Federal de UberlândiaBRPrograma de Pós-graduação em FilosofiaCiências HumanasUFUBonella, Alcino Eduardohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4728789P4Agnol, DarleidallAlmada, Leonardo Ferreirahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4744294U8Rosa, Leila Cristina2016-06-22T18:42:48Z2013-11-062016-06-22T18:42:48Z2012-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfROSA, Leila Cristina. A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida. 2012. 92 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2012.338https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/15572https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2012.338porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFUinstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFU2022-11-09T18:45:02Zoai:repositorio.ufu.br:123456789/15572Repositório InstitucionalONGhttp://repositorio.ufu.br/oai/requestdiinf@dirbi.ufu.bropendoar:2022-11-09T18:45:02Repositório Institucional da UFU - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida |
title |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida |
spellingShingle |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida Rosa, Leila Cristina Singer, Peter, 1946- McMahan, Jeff, 1954- Bioética Ética Singer McMahan Valor da vida Santidade Value of life Sanctity CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida |
title_full |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida |
title_fullStr |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida |
title_full_unstemmed |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida |
title_sort |
A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida |
author |
Rosa, Leila Cristina |
author_facet |
Rosa, Leila Cristina |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Bonella, Alcino Eduardo http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4728789P4 Agnol, Darleidall Almada, Leonardo Ferreira http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4744294U8 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosa, Leila Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Singer, Peter, 1946- McMahan, Jeff, 1954- Bioética Ética Singer McMahan Valor da vida Santidade Value of life Sanctity CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
topic |
Singer, Peter, 1946- McMahan, Jeff, 1954- Bioética Ética Singer McMahan Valor da vida Santidade Value of life Sanctity CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
This dissertation examines some points made by philosophers such as Peter Singer and Jeff McMahan about the morality of killing. Respectively, in the books Practical Ethics (2006) and Ethics in killing (2011), the authors delimit and justify the ethical to respect and / or the right to life, both of people as of non-human animals. According to Singer (2006), the only beings with selfawareness, self-control, sense of past and future, must have the right to life, thus including some non-human animals in the moral sphere. McMahan (2011) endorse the criticism of Singer about the notion of sanctity of life, but he does not include the moral sphere as does Singer. Peter Singer and McMahan elect respectively the principles of equal consideration of interests and approach of time-relative interest as guides for action to regulate morality in killing act. Notably the ethical approach of Singer enables us to reach the best consequences in a more clear and objective. McMahan, on the other hand, offer us an alternative relevant to judging not paradigmatic cases of killing. Finally, the authors' search is for arguments and principles that can answer the most pressing issues related to life, although we can identify theoretical differences between the three authors, in fact all are aimed at satisfying the interests of individuals and the search for the best consequences on issues related to abortion and euthanasia. It is the case to understand the relevance of the assumption of the sanctity of life to regulate ethical principles that can regulate actions related to such issues. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-28 2013-11-06 2016-06-22T18:42:48Z 2016-06-22T18:42:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
ROSA, Leila Cristina. A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida. 2012. 92 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2012.338 https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/15572 https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2012.338 |
identifier_str_mv |
ROSA, Leila Cristina. A ética da terminação da vida e o valor da vida. 2012. 92 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2012.338 |
url |
https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/15572 https://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.di.2012.338 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia BR Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia Ciências Humanas UFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia BR Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia Ciências Humanas UFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFU instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFU |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFU |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFU - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
diinf@dirbi.ufu.br |
_version_ |
1813711437597507584 |