Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, João Pedro Silva
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFU
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/39683
Resumo: Brazilian beef cattle farming is mainly based on the pasture production system. Knowing that we have a productive seasonality of forage crops, and that it occurs during the dry period of the year, the use of food supplements for animals is necessary for us to have good animal productivity. The objective of this work was to evaluate profitability and costs, using extruded and/or crumbled multiple mixtures; in addition to the mineral mixture, for beef cattle grazing during the dry season. Three treatments were tested with eight animals each, two treatments using a single multiple mixture that went through one of the processes: extrusion (MME) or fine grinding (MMF), and a third control treatment being offered only mineral supplement (SM) to the animals. animals. The costs of supplementing the animals, the total profit and the net profit obtained in the activity were evaluated. When analyzing the data, no positive net margin and return on invested capital were found in any of the evaluated treatments. Total revenue was R$1,787.60 in the SM treatment, R$1,929.62 in the MME treatment and R$1,924.21 in the MMF treatment. The SM treatment had the lowest supplementation cost of R$32.50, 368.43 and 346.83% lower than the MME and MMF treatments, respectively, and the lowest cost per arroba produced in relation to the other treatments, of R$118,75. The net margin, of R$-79,94 and return of -4.33%, followed by the MMF treatment, which obtained a margin of R$-93.10 and a return of -5.67%, and by the MME treatment, with net margin of R$-94.71 and return of -5.74%. The latter being the one with the highest supplementation cost per animal, of R$152.24, and a daily rate of R$1.74, followed by MMF treatments, with a cost of R$145.22 and a daily rate of R$1.66, and by the SM with a cost of R$32.50 per animal and a daily rate of R$0.51. The total profit was R$-60,35 in the SM treatment, R$-93.10 in the MMF treatment and R$-94.71 in the MME treatment, although this has obtained the highest total revenue among the treatments. It is concluded that under the conditions evaluated, supplementation with multiple extruded or mashed mixtures and mineral supplements for cattle were not economically viable.
id UFU_ec2b12be69e03aaaf63f7815279c359f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufu.br:123456789/39683
network_acronym_str UFU
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFU
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da SecaBovinosCattleCustosCostsMargem líquidaNet marginProteinadoProteinSuplementaçãoSupplementationCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIASBrazilian beef cattle farming is mainly based on the pasture production system. Knowing that we have a productive seasonality of forage crops, and that it occurs during the dry period of the year, the use of food supplements for animals is necessary for us to have good animal productivity. The objective of this work was to evaluate profitability and costs, using extruded and/or crumbled multiple mixtures; in addition to the mineral mixture, for beef cattle grazing during the dry season. Three treatments were tested with eight animals each, two treatments using a single multiple mixture that went through one of the processes: extrusion (MME) or fine grinding (MMF), and a third control treatment being offered only mineral supplement (SM) to the animals. animals. The costs of supplementing the animals, the total profit and the net profit obtained in the activity were evaluated. When analyzing the data, no positive net margin and return on invested capital were found in any of the evaluated treatments. Total revenue was R$1,787.60 in the SM treatment, R$1,929.62 in the MME treatment and R$1,924.21 in the MMF treatment. The SM treatment had the lowest supplementation cost of R$32.50, 368.43 and 346.83% lower than the MME and MMF treatments, respectively, and the lowest cost per arroba produced in relation to the other treatments, of R$118,75. The net margin, of R$-79,94 and return of -4.33%, followed by the MMF treatment, which obtained a margin of R$-93.10 and a return of -5.67%, and by the MME treatment, with net margin of R$-94.71 and return of -5.74%. The latter being the one with the highest supplementation cost per animal, of R$152.24, and a daily rate of R$1.74, followed by MMF treatments, with a cost of R$145.22 and a daily rate of R$1.66, and by the SM with a cost of R$32.50 per animal and a daily rate of R$0.51. The total profit was R$-60,35 in the SM treatment, R$-93.10 in the MMF treatment and R$-94.71 in the MME treatment, although this has obtained the highest total revenue among the treatments. It is concluded that under the conditions evaluated, supplementation with multiple extruded or mashed mixtures and mineral supplements for cattle were not economically viable.Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação)A pecuária de corte brasileira é baseada principalmente no sistema de produção a pasto. Sabendo que temos uma estacionalidade produtiva das forrageiras, e que ela ocorre no período seco do ano, o uso de suplementos alimentares aos animais se faz necessário para que tenhamos boa produtividade animal. Objetivou-se com este trabalho avaliar a lucratividade e os custos, com o uso de mistura múltipla extrusada e/ou farelada; além da mistura mineral, para bovinos de corte em pastejo na época da seca. Foram testados três tratamentos com oito animais em cada, sendo dois tratamentos usando uma única mistura múltipla que passou por um dos processamentos: extrusão (MME) ou moagem fina (MMF), e um terceiro tratamento controle sendo ofertado apenas suplemento mineral (SM) aos animais. Foram avaliados os custos com a suplementação dos animais, o lucro total e o lucro líquido obtidos na atividade. Ao analisar os dados, não foi encontrado margem líquida e retorno sobre o capital investido positivos em nenhum dos tratamentos avaliados. A receita total foi de R$1.787,60 no tratamento SM, R$1.929,62 no tratamento MME e de R$1.924,21 no tratamento MMF. O tratamento SM apresentou o menor custo de suplementação de R$32,50, inferior 368,43 e 346,83% em relação aos tratamentos MME e MMF, respectivamente, e menor custo de arroba produzida em relação aos demais tratamentos, de R$118,75. A margem líquida, de R$-79,94 e retorno de -4,33%, seguido pelo tratamento MMF, que obteve margem de R$-93,10 e retorno de -5,67%, e pelo tratamento MME, com margem líquida de R$-94,71 e retorno de -5,74%. Sendo este último o que apresentou o maior custo de suplementação por animal, de R$152,24, e diária de R$1,74, seguido pelos tratamentos MMF, com custo de R$145,22 e diária de R$1,66 e pelo tratamento SM com custo de R$32,50 por animal e diária de R$0,51. O lucro total foi de R$-60,35 no tratamento SM, R$-93,10 no tratamento MMF e de R$-94,71 no tratamento MME, embora este tenho obtido a maior receita total entre os tratamentos. Conclui-se que nas condições avaliadas a suplementação com mistura múltipla extrusada ou farelada, e de suplemento mineral para bovinos não se fizeram viáveis economicamente.Universidade Federal de UberlândiaBrasilZootecniaMagalhães, Felipe Antuneshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7417512029889030Costa, Frederico Augusto de Alcântarahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0749255514528676Barbero, Leandro Martinshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5502475288691413Costa, João Pedro Silva2023-12-06T13:24:28Z2023-12-06T13:24:28Z2023-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisapplication/pdfCOSTA, João Pedro Silva. Avaliação econômica do uso de suplementos para novilhos de corte em pastejo no período da seca. 2023. 25 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2023.https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/39683porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFUinstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFU2023-12-07T06:18:46Zoai:repositorio.ufu.br:123456789/39683Repositório InstitucionalONGhttp://repositorio.ufu.br/oai/requestdiinf@dirbi.ufu.bropendoar:2023-12-07T06:18:46Repositório Institucional da UFU - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca
title Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca
spellingShingle Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca
Costa, João Pedro Silva
Bovinos
Cattle
Custos
Costs
Margem líquida
Net margin
Proteinado
Protein
Suplementação
Supplementation
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS
title_short Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca
title_full Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca
title_fullStr Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca
title_sort Avaliação Econômica do Uso de Suplementos Para Novilhos de corte em Pastejo no Período da Seca
author Costa, João Pedro Silva
author_facet Costa, João Pedro Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Magalhães, Felipe Antunes
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7417512029889030
Costa, Frederico Augusto de Alcântara
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0749255514528676
Barbero, Leandro Martins
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5502475288691413
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, João Pedro Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bovinos
Cattle
Custos
Costs
Margem líquida
Net margin
Proteinado
Protein
Suplementação
Supplementation
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS
topic Bovinos
Cattle
Custos
Costs
Margem líquida
Net margin
Proteinado
Protein
Suplementação
Supplementation
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS
description Brazilian beef cattle farming is mainly based on the pasture production system. Knowing that we have a productive seasonality of forage crops, and that it occurs during the dry period of the year, the use of food supplements for animals is necessary for us to have good animal productivity. The objective of this work was to evaluate profitability and costs, using extruded and/or crumbled multiple mixtures; in addition to the mineral mixture, for beef cattle grazing during the dry season. Three treatments were tested with eight animals each, two treatments using a single multiple mixture that went through one of the processes: extrusion (MME) or fine grinding (MMF), and a third control treatment being offered only mineral supplement (SM) to the animals. animals. The costs of supplementing the animals, the total profit and the net profit obtained in the activity were evaluated. When analyzing the data, no positive net margin and return on invested capital were found in any of the evaluated treatments. Total revenue was R$1,787.60 in the SM treatment, R$1,929.62 in the MME treatment and R$1,924.21 in the MMF treatment. The SM treatment had the lowest supplementation cost of R$32.50, 368.43 and 346.83% lower than the MME and MMF treatments, respectively, and the lowest cost per arroba produced in relation to the other treatments, of R$118,75. The net margin, of R$-79,94 and return of -4.33%, followed by the MMF treatment, which obtained a margin of R$-93.10 and a return of -5.67%, and by the MME treatment, with net margin of R$-94.71 and return of -5.74%. The latter being the one with the highest supplementation cost per animal, of R$152.24, and a daily rate of R$1.74, followed by MMF treatments, with a cost of R$145.22 and a daily rate of R$1.66, and by the SM with a cost of R$32.50 per animal and a daily rate of R$0.51. The total profit was R$-60,35 in the SM treatment, R$-93.10 in the MMF treatment and R$-94.71 in the MME treatment, although this has obtained the highest total revenue among the treatments. It is concluded that under the conditions evaluated, supplementation with multiple extruded or mashed mixtures and mineral supplements for cattle were not economically viable.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-06T13:24:28Z
2023-12-06T13:24:28Z
2023-11-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv COSTA, João Pedro Silva. Avaliação econômica do uso de suplementos para novilhos de corte em pastejo no período da seca. 2023. 25 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2023.
https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/39683
identifier_str_mv COSTA, João Pedro Silva. Avaliação econômica do uso de suplementos para novilhos de corte em pastejo no período da seca. 2023. 25 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, 2023.
url https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/39683
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Brasil
Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Brasil
Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFU
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFU
collection Repositório Institucional da UFU
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFU - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv diinf@dirbi.ufu.br
_version_ 1805569669971574784