Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia na Agricultura |
DOI: | 10.13083/reveng.v29i1.11575 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/11575 |
Resumo: | Anaerobic digestion for treatment of swine wastewater is an attractive alternative, among other aspects, for the generation of biogas. This gas is composed predominantly of methane and can be converted into electrical and thermal energy. However, the knowledge of the biogas composition is of paramount importance, especially regarding the methane content due to its energetic properties. The alternatives for this determination usually require high cost and specialized technicians. Therefore, the search for simple and low cost alternative solutions and techniques can improve the biogas use as an energy source and favor energy sustainability in pig farming. The present study aimed to compare the results of the methane composition of a portable analyzer with that of a Gasboard gas analyzer. The biogas was collected and characterized in a full cycle swine farm from January to December 2019 in the municipality of Teixeiras (MG), Brazil. The methane composition values did not differ statistically for a 5% significance level between the evaluated methods. The use of the portable kit is a simple and low cost alternative in determining the methane content in biogas and can be used reliably. |
id |
UFV-2_3fc203c16caa975c50bc7830676b265c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/11575 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV-2 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
spelling |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization?Covered lagoon biodigestersBiogasAnaerobic digestionMethanePig farmingAnaerobic digestion for treatment of swine wastewater is an attractive alternative, among other aspects, for the generation of biogas. This gas is composed predominantly of methane and can be converted into electrical and thermal energy. However, the knowledge of the biogas composition is of paramount importance, especially regarding the methane content due to its energetic properties. The alternatives for this determination usually require high cost and specialized technicians. Therefore, the search for simple and low cost alternative solutions and techniques can improve the biogas use as an energy source and favor energy sustainability in pig farming. The present study aimed to compare the results of the methane composition of a portable analyzer with that of a Gasboard gas analyzer. The biogas was collected and characterized in a full cycle swine farm from January to December 2019 in the municipality of Teixeiras (MG), Brazil. The methane composition values did not differ statistically for a 5% significance level between the evaluated methods. The use of the portable kit is a simple and low cost alternative in determining the methane content in biogas and can be used reliably.Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV2021-04-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/1157510.13083/reveng.v29i1.11575Engineering in Agriculture; Vol. 29 No. Contínua (2021); 36-40Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG; v. 29 n. Contínua (2021); 36-402175-68131414-3984reponame:Engenharia na Agriculturainstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVenghttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/11575/6580Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - Revenghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Oliveira, Nathalia Rosa, André PereiraSousa, Izabelle de PaulaOliveira Lopes, JuciaraCarraro Borges, Alisson Perez, Ronaldo2023-01-23T14:06:01Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/11575Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revengPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/oairevistaengenharianagricultura@gmail.com||andrerosa@ufv.br||tramitacao.reveng@gmail.com|| reveng@ufv.br2175-68131414-3984opendoar:2023-01-23T14:06:01Engenharia na Agricultura - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? |
title |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? |
spellingShingle |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? Silva Oliveira, Nathalia Covered lagoon biodigesters Biogas Anaerobic digestion Methane Pig farming Silva Oliveira, Nathalia Covered lagoon biodigesters Biogas Anaerobic digestion Methane Pig farming |
title_short |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? |
title_full |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? |
title_fullStr |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? |
title_sort |
Can portable analyzers be reliable for biogas characterization? |
author |
Silva Oliveira, Nathalia |
author_facet |
Silva Oliveira, Nathalia Silva Oliveira, Nathalia Rosa, André Pereira Sousa, Izabelle de Paula Oliveira Lopes, Juciara Carraro Borges, Alisson Perez, Ronaldo Rosa, André Pereira Sousa, Izabelle de Paula Oliveira Lopes, Juciara Carraro Borges, Alisson Perez, Ronaldo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rosa, André Pereira Sousa, Izabelle de Paula Oliveira Lopes, Juciara Carraro Borges, Alisson Perez, Ronaldo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva Oliveira, Nathalia Rosa, André Pereira Sousa, Izabelle de Paula Oliveira Lopes, Juciara Carraro Borges, Alisson Perez, Ronaldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Covered lagoon biodigesters Biogas Anaerobic digestion Methane Pig farming |
topic |
Covered lagoon biodigesters Biogas Anaerobic digestion Methane Pig farming |
description |
Anaerobic digestion for treatment of swine wastewater is an attractive alternative, among other aspects, for the generation of biogas. This gas is composed predominantly of methane and can be converted into electrical and thermal energy. However, the knowledge of the biogas composition is of paramount importance, especially regarding the methane content due to its energetic properties. The alternatives for this determination usually require high cost and specialized technicians. Therefore, the search for simple and low cost alternative solutions and techniques can improve the biogas use as an energy source and favor energy sustainability in pig farming. The present study aimed to compare the results of the methane composition of a portable analyzer with that of a Gasboard gas analyzer. The biogas was collected and characterized in a full cycle swine farm from January to December 2019 in the municipality of Teixeiras (MG), Brazil. The methane composition values did not differ statistically for a 5% significance level between the evaluated methods. The use of the portable kit is a simple and low cost alternative in determining the methane content in biogas and can be used reliably. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/11575 10.13083/reveng.v29i1.11575 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/11575 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.13083/reveng.v29i1.11575 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/11575/6580 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - Reveng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - Reveng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engineering in Agriculture; Vol. 29 No. Contínua (2021); 36-40 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG; v. 29 n. Contínua (2021); 36-40 2175-6813 1414-3984 reponame:Engenharia na Agricultura instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
collection |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia na Agricultura - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaengenharianagricultura@gmail.com||andrerosa@ufv.br||tramitacao.reveng@gmail.com|| reveng@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1822179074896822272 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.13083/reveng.v29i1.11575 |