Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia na Agricultura |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/10573 |
Resumo: | The variety of forage harvester models available on Brazilian market demand practical tools for selecting and ranking these equipments. The present study aimed at the elaboration of an algorithm capable of providing simple and objective criteria that assist in the decision making. The communication channel of the companies was used to obtain technical specifications and price of the equipment, which were tabulated in spreadsheets. The instructions for the manipulation of the obtained data were elaborated in the software R, being calculated ranks for the following requirements considering simulated information about a farm: price (COT), productivity and price relation (PROD.COT), fuel consumption (CONS), operational comfort (CONF), versatility (VERS) and overall (GERAL). We obtained information from 45 models belonging to 8 companies. The best machine in the overall rank got similar rank in the COT, PROD.COT and CONS ranks and worst rank for CONF. The algorithm established allowed the selection and ranking of the forage harvesters analyzed, providing simple, objective and easily interpreted criteria for the use of the farmers and the technicians who assist them. |
id |
UFV-2_6266c4956a38a76a83adc32a817f5548 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/10573 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV-2 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvestersComputational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvestersAgricultural machineryAlgorithmForage harvestComparisonRankingSelectionAgricultural machinery Algorithm Forage harvest Comparison Ranking SelectionThe variety of forage harvester models available on Brazilian market demand practical tools for selecting and ranking these equipments. The present study aimed at the elaboration of an algorithm capable of providing simple and objective criteria that assist in the decision making. The communication channel of the companies was used to obtain technical specifications and price of the equipment, which were tabulated in spreadsheets. The instructions for the manipulation of the obtained data were elaborated in the software R, being calculated ranks for the following requirements considering simulated information about a farm: price (COT), productivity and price relation (PROD.COT), fuel consumption (CONS), operational comfort (CONF), versatility (VERS) and overall (GERAL). We obtained information from 45 models belonging to 8 companies. The best machine in the overall rank got similar rank in the COT, PROD.COT and CONS ranks and worst rank for CONF. The algorithm established allowed the selection and ranking of the forage harvesters analyzed, providing simple, objective and easily interpreted criteria for the use of the farmers and the technicians who assist them.The variety of forage harvester models available in the Brazilian market demands practical tools for selecting and ranking this equipment. The present study aimed to develop an algorithm capable of providing simple and objective criteria that assist in decision-making for purchase. The communication channel of the companies was used to obtain technical specifications and the price of the equipment, which were tabulated in spreadsheets. The instructions for the manipulation of the obtained data were elaborated in the software R, with calculated ranks for the following requirements based on simulated information about a farm: price (PR), productivity and price relation (PROD.PR), fuel consumption (FC), operational comfort (OC), versatility (VERS), and overall (ALL). We obtained information from 45 models belonging to eight companies. The best machine in the overall rank (Cremasco Custom 950 C-III) was similar in the PR, PROD.PR, and FC ranks and the worst rank for OC. The algorithm established allowed the selection and ranking of the analyzed forage harvesters, providing simple, objective, and easily interpreted criteria for farmers’ use and the technicians who assist them.Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV2021-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/1057310.13083/reveng.v29i1.10573Engineering in Agriculture; Vol. 29 No. Contínua (2021); 129-137Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG; v. 29 n. Contínua (2021); 129-1372175-68131414-3984reponame:Engenharia na Agriculturainstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVenghttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/10573/6796Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - Revenghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilveira, Daniel Duarte da Sigales, Marlon Soares Centurion, Ramón Justiniano Benítez Reis, Ângelo Vieira dosFerreira, Mauro Fernando2023-01-23T14:06:01Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/10573Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revengPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/oairevistaengenharianagricultura@gmail.com||andrerosa@ufv.br||tramitacao.reveng@gmail.com|| reveng@ufv.br2175-68131414-3984opendoar:2023-01-23T14:06:01Engenharia na Agricultura - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters |
title |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters |
spellingShingle |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters Silveira, Daniel Duarte da Agricultural machinery Algorithm Forage harvest Comparison Ranking Selection Agricultural machinery Algorithm Forage harvest Comparison Ranking Selection |
title_short |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters |
title_full |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters |
title_fullStr |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters |
title_sort |
Computational tool for selection and ranking of pull-type forage harvesters |
author |
Silveira, Daniel Duarte da |
author_facet |
Silveira, Daniel Duarte da Sigales, Marlon Soares Centurion, Ramón Justiniano Benítez Reis, Ângelo Vieira dos Ferreira, Mauro Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sigales, Marlon Soares Centurion, Ramón Justiniano Benítez Reis, Ângelo Vieira dos Ferreira, Mauro Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silveira, Daniel Duarte da Sigales, Marlon Soares Centurion, Ramón Justiniano Benítez Reis, Ângelo Vieira dos Ferreira, Mauro Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Agricultural machinery Algorithm Forage harvest Comparison Ranking Selection Agricultural machinery Algorithm Forage harvest Comparison Ranking Selection |
topic |
Agricultural machinery Algorithm Forage harvest Comparison Ranking Selection Agricultural machinery Algorithm Forage harvest Comparison Ranking Selection |
description |
The variety of forage harvester models available on Brazilian market demand practical tools for selecting and ranking these equipments. The present study aimed at the elaboration of an algorithm capable of providing simple and objective criteria that assist in the decision making. The communication channel of the companies was used to obtain technical specifications and price of the equipment, which were tabulated in spreadsheets. The instructions for the manipulation of the obtained data were elaborated in the software R, being calculated ranks for the following requirements considering simulated information about a farm: price (COT), productivity and price relation (PROD.COT), fuel consumption (CONS), operational comfort (CONF), versatility (VERS) and overall (GERAL). We obtained information from 45 models belonging to 8 companies. The best machine in the overall rank got similar rank in the COT, PROD.COT and CONS ranks and worst rank for CONF. The algorithm established allowed the selection and ranking of the forage harvesters analyzed, providing simple, objective and easily interpreted criteria for the use of the farmers and the technicians who assist them. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/10573 10.13083/reveng.v29i1.10573 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/10573 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.13083/reveng.v29i1.10573 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/10573/6796 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - Reveng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - Reveng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engineering in Agriculture; Vol. 29 No. Contínua (2021); 129-137 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG; v. 29 n. Contínua (2021); 129-137 2175-6813 1414-3984 reponame:Engenharia na Agricultura instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
collection |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia na Agricultura - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaengenharianagricultura@gmail.com||andrerosa@ufv.br||tramitacao.reveng@gmail.com|| reveng@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1800211147050188800 |