Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia na Agricultura |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/7320 |
Resumo: | The soil hydro-physical characteristics are very important for studies about soil water dynamics. The soil water retention curve it is a soil characteristic sometimes expensive and time consuming to be done and could be a problem for farmers. The numbers of points and its tension evaluated are normally choose arbitrarily. This study aimed to define the fewest pairs of soil moisture and water soil potential points which result in a reliable water retention curve in two different soils (sandy and clay). Using different tensions by suction table and Richards’ pressure chamber, nine replications were adjusted by van Genuchten's equation. Curves with 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13 points were studied and the curve with 13 points was adopted as standard. The obtained parameters for different pairs of soil moisture and their corresponding soil water potential were compared to the equivalent standard curve and submitted to analysis of variance (F test), and their values were compared by the Scott-Knott test (5% of probability). The curve with 7 points, using the tensions of 0; 40; 100; 300; 1,000; 5,000 e 15,000 hPa, was the lower number of points that did not showed statistical difference in any parameters of the model and the point with 15,000 hPa shown to be important and should be used on the combination of points to obtain a good adjustment. |
id |
UFV-2_fabc788ed0cbaa87853d062099c026c4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/7320 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV-2 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamberirrigation managementsoil physicssoil moistureThe soil hydro-physical characteristics are very important for studies about soil water dynamics. The soil water retention curve it is a soil characteristic sometimes expensive and time consuming to be done and could be a problem for farmers. The numbers of points and its tension evaluated are normally choose arbitrarily. This study aimed to define the fewest pairs of soil moisture and water soil potential points which result in a reliable water retention curve in two different soils (sandy and clay). Using different tensions by suction table and Richards’ pressure chamber, nine replications were adjusted by van Genuchten's equation. Curves with 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13 points were studied and the curve with 13 points was adopted as standard. The obtained parameters for different pairs of soil moisture and their corresponding soil water potential were compared to the equivalent standard curve and submitted to analysis of variance (F test), and their values were compared by the Scott-Knott test (5% of probability). The curve with 7 points, using the tensions of 0; 40; 100; 300; 1,000; 5,000 e 15,000 hPa, was the lower number of points that did not showed statistical difference in any parameters of the model and the point with 15,000 hPa shown to be important and should be used on the combination of points to obtain a good adjustment.Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV2020-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/732010.13083/reveng.v29i1.7320Engineering in Agriculture; Vol. 28 No. Contínua (2020); 477-487Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG; v. 28 n. Contínua (2020); 477-4872175-68131414-3984reponame:Engenharia na Agriculturainstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVenghttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/7320/6294Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA ENGENHARIA NA AGRICULTURA - REVENGhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrigolon, Gilmar BatistaDiotto, Adriano ValentimLima, Carlos José Gonçalves de SouzaFrancisco, João PauloFolegatti, Marcos Vinícius2023-01-19T13:39:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/7320Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revengPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/oairevistaengenharianagricultura@gmail.com||andrerosa@ufv.br||tramitacao.reveng@gmail.com|| reveng@ufv.br2175-68131414-3984opendoar:2023-01-19T13:39:06Engenharia na Agricultura - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber |
title |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber |
spellingShingle |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber Grigolon, Gilmar Batista irrigation management soil physics soil moisture |
title_short |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber |
title_full |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber |
title_fullStr |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber |
title_sort |
Minimum number of points for a reliable soil water retention curve using Richards’ pressure chamber |
author |
Grigolon, Gilmar Batista |
author_facet |
Grigolon, Gilmar Batista Diotto, Adriano Valentim Lima, Carlos José Gonçalves de Souza Francisco, João Paulo Folegatti, Marcos Vinícius |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Diotto, Adriano Valentim Lima, Carlos José Gonçalves de Souza Francisco, João Paulo Folegatti, Marcos Vinícius |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grigolon, Gilmar Batista Diotto, Adriano Valentim Lima, Carlos José Gonçalves de Souza Francisco, João Paulo Folegatti, Marcos Vinícius |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
irrigation management soil physics soil moisture |
topic |
irrigation management soil physics soil moisture |
description |
The soil hydro-physical characteristics are very important for studies about soil water dynamics. The soil water retention curve it is a soil characteristic sometimes expensive and time consuming to be done and could be a problem for farmers. The numbers of points and its tension evaluated are normally choose arbitrarily. This study aimed to define the fewest pairs of soil moisture and water soil potential points which result in a reliable water retention curve in two different soils (sandy and clay). Using different tensions by suction table and Richards’ pressure chamber, nine replications were adjusted by van Genuchten's equation. Curves with 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13 points were studied and the curve with 13 points was adopted as standard. The obtained parameters for different pairs of soil moisture and their corresponding soil water potential were compared to the equivalent standard curve and submitted to analysis of variance (F test), and their values were compared by the Scott-Knott test (5% of probability). The curve with 7 points, using the tensions of 0; 40; 100; 300; 1,000; 5,000 e 15,000 hPa, was the lower number of points that did not showed statistical difference in any parameters of the model and the point with 15,000 hPa shown to be important and should be used on the combination of points to obtain a good adjustment. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/7320 10.13083/reveng.v29i1.7320 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/7320 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.13083/reveng.v29i1.7320 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/7320/6294 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA ENGENHARIA NA AGRICULTURA - REVENG https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA ENGENHARIA NA AGRICULTURA - REVENG https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engineering in Agriculture; Vol. 28 No. Contínua (2020); 477-487 Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG; v. 28 n. Contínua (2020); 477-487 2175-6813 1414-3984 reponame:Engenharia na Agricultura instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
collection |
Engenharia na Agricultura |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia na Agricultura - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaengenharianagricultura@gmail.com||andrerosa@ufv.br||tramitacao.reveng@gmail.com|| reveng@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1800211146956865536 |