ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Administração Pública e Gestão Social |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufv.br/apgs/article/view/3999 |
Resumo: | The objective of this article is to investigate, briefly, the epistemological and ontological bases of political administration. The work started in the administration’s point of view and showed a counterpoint about the one-dimensional market vision through the work of Alberto Guerreiro Ramos. It reaffirms society’s multidimensional character and, consequently, recovers the interdisciplinary bias of the Social Administrator, that is gradually disappearing at the expense of the “market rules”. It is understood that the market is important, but is not the only legitimate social enclave, as it is presented nowadays. Using a methodology based on a bibliographic research and, after, the epistemology analysis of administration and its economic base, it is concluded that the market extreme influence destroys the interdisciplinary character of this science. Guerreiro Ramos develops a theoretician set with social systems theories that believe that the market is one of the enclaves in society, but not the only one. This theoretician set called paraeconomy provides the administration science a new horizon, where the Administrator’s role will be reconfigured and will cease being strategical (focused on market’s one-dimensional logic) for being Social (dialogical and multidimensional).Key-Words: Political Administration; Epistemology of Administration; Theory of Transaction Costs; Paraeconomy. |
id |
UFV-3_344b608aa23e150a3c2b32a71bd550ee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/3999 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV-3 |
network_name_str |
Administração Pública e Gestão Social |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMYREFLEXÕES ONTOLÓGICAS E EPISTEMOLÓGICAS SOBRE O FUTURO DA ADMINISTRAÇÃO: ECONOMIA VERSUS PARAECONOMIAAdministração PolíticaEpistemologia da AdministraçãoTeoria dos Custos de TransaçãoParaeconomiaThe objective of this article is to investigate, briefly, the epistemological and ontological bases of political administration. The work started in the administration’s point of view and showed a counterpoint about the one-dimensional market vision through the work of Alberto Guerreiro Ramos. It reaffirms society’s multidimensional character and, consequently, recovers the interdisciplinary bias of the Social Administrator, that is gradually disappearing at the expense of the “market rules”. It is understood that the market is important, but is not the only legitimate social enclave, as it is presented nowadays. Using a methodology based on a bibliographic research and, after, the epistemology analysis of administration and its economic base, it is concluded that the market extreme influence destroys the interdisciplinary character of this science. Guerreiro Ramos develops a theoretician set with social systems theories that believe that the market is one of the enclaves in society, but not the only one. This theoretician set called paraeconomy provides the administration science a new horizon, where the Administrator’s role will be reconfigured and will cease being strategical (focused on market’s one-dimensional logic) for being Social (dialogical and multidimensional).Key-Words: Political Administration; Epistemology of Administration; Theory of Transaction Costs; Paraeconomy. O objetivo deste trabalho é investigar, brevemente, as raízes epistemológicas e ontológicas da administração política. Partindo do ponto de vista da própria administração, é apresentada uma idéia contrária à visão mercadológica unidimensional através do trabalho de Alberto Guerreiro Ramos. Reafirma-se o caráter multidimensional da sociedade e, conseqüentemente, recupera-se o viés interdisciplinar do Administrador Social, que vem aos poucos desaparecendo em detrimento das “regras do mercado”. Entende-se que este é importante, mas não é o único entrave social legítimo, como é apresentado na atualidade. Parte-se de uma metodologia de pesquisa bibliográfica e, após a análise a epistemológica da administração e de sua raiz econômica, conclui-se que a influência excessiva do mercado desgasta o caráter interdisciplinar desta ciência. Guerreiro Ramos desenvolve a estrutura analítica com uma teoria de sistemas sociais que considera o mercado um dos problemas na sociedade, porém não o único. Este conjunto, chamado paraeconomia, fornece à ciência da administração uma nova perspectiva, na qual o papel do Administrador será reconfigurado e deixará de ser Estratégico (voltado para a lógica unidimensional do mercado) para ser Social (dialógico e multidimensional).Universidade Federal de Viçosa2010-07-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/apgs/article/view/399910.21118/apgs.v1i1.3999Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; Bd. 1 Nr. 1 (2009); 88-100Administração Pública e Gestão Social; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2009); 88-100Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2009); 88-100Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2009); 88-100Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; V. 1 N. 1 (2009); 88-100Administração Pública e Gestão Social; v. 1 n. 1 (2009); 88-100Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; 卷 1 编号 1 (2009); 88-1002175-5787reponame:Administração Pública e Gestão Socialinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/apgs/article/view/3999/2230Cesar Andrade de Abreu, JúlioReis Armond-de-Melo, Danielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-06-25T19:50:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/3999Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/apgsPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/apgs/oaiapgs.ufv@gmail.com||wescleysxavier@yahoo.com.br2175-57872175-5787opendoar:2019-06-25T19:50:41Administração Pública e Gestão Social - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY REFLEXÕES ONTOLÓGICAS E EPISTEMOLÓGICAS SOBRE O FUTURO DA ADMINISTRAÇÃO: ECONOMIA VERSUS PARAECONOMIA |
title |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY |
spellingShingle |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY Cesar Andrade de Abreu, Júlio Administração Política Epistemologia da Administração Teoria dos Custos de Transação Paraeconomia |
title_short |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY |
title_full |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY |
title_fullStr |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY |
title_full_unstemmed |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY |
title_sort |
ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL REFLECTION ON THE FUTURE OF ADMINISTRATION: ECONOMY VERSUS PARAECONOMY |
author |
Cesar Andrade de Abreu, Júlio |
author_facet |
Cesar Andrade de Abreu, Júlio Reis Armond-de-Melo, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Reis Armond-de-Melo, Daniel |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cesar Andrade de Abreu, Júlio Reis Armond-de-Melo, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Administração Política Epistemologia da Administração Teoria dos Custos de Transação Paraeconomia |
topic |
Administração Política Epistemologia da Administração Teoria dos Custos de Transação Paraeconomia |
description |
The objective of this article is to investigate, briefly, the epistemological and ontological bases of political administration. The work started in the administration’s point of view and showed a counterpoint about the one-dimensional market vision through the work of Alberto Guerreiro Ramos. It reaffirms society’s multidimensional character and, consequently, recovers the interdisciplinary bias of the Social Administrator, that is gradually disappearing at the expense of the “market rules”. It is understood that the market is important, but is not the only legitimate social enclave, as it is presented nowadays. Using a methodology based on a bibliographic research and, after, the epistemology analysis of administration and its economic base, it is concluded that the market extreme influence destroys the interdisciplinary character of this science. Guerreiro Ramos develops a theoretician set with social systems theories that believe that the market is one of the enclaves in society, but not the only one. This theoretician set called paraeconomy provides the administration science a new horizon, where the Administrator’s role will be reconfigured and will cease being strategical (focused on market’s one-dimensional logic) for being Social (dialogical and multidimensional).Key-Words: Political Administration; Epistemology of Administration; Theory of Transaction Costs; Paraeconomy. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-07-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/apgs/article/view/3999 10.21118/apgs.v1i1.3999 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/apgs/article/view/3999 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21118/apgs.v1i1.3999 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufv.br/apgs/article/view/3999/2230 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; Bd. 1 Nr. 1 (2009); 88-100 Administração Pública e Gestão Social; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2009); 88-100 Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2009); 88-100 Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2009); 88-100 Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; V. 1 N. 1 (2009); 88-100 Administração Pública e Gestão Social; v. 1 n. 1 (2009); 88-100 Revista de Administração Pública e Gestão Social; 卷 1 编号 1 (2009); 88-100 2175-5787 reponame:Administração Pública e Gestão Social instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
Administração Pública e Gestão Social |
collection |
Administração Pública e Gestão Social |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Administração Pública e Gestão Social - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
apgs.ufv@gmail.com||wescleysxavier@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1800211102564352000 |