The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Paulo Fernando Soares
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11226
Resumo: The article discusses how "heritage inventions" take place, as possibilities of rights, and, through this, the racialization when making these choices. With the nomination characteristic of the Law in mind, we defy its role in cultural systems that interact with patrimonialization, which usually make a distinction of the cultural heritage and practices of the hegemonic groups. In this context, the use of the law, through its nomination power, contained in the legal protection of heritage, has been one of the means used to racialize the issue and, consequently, the nation's identity and representation. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the Federal Constitution of 1988 broke with the hegemonic tradition when it allowed indigenous, Afro-Brazilians and other groups to participate in the national civilization process, by opening cracks in the monolith of the monocultural representation of the Nation in the Luso-Brazilian tradition. The methodology used was a critical review of literature.
id UFV-7_13cbc96537c8c6ccad0b15b2e93defb8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/11226
network_acronym_str UFV-7
network_name_str Revista de Direito
repository_id_str
spelling The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolithA invenção dos direitos e a racialização dos patrimônios: a Constituição de 1988 e a desconstrução do monolito monocultural da naçãoPatrimônioInvençãoRacismoConstituiçãoRepresentaçãoHeritageInventioRacismConstitutionRepresentationThe article discusses how "heritage inventions" take place, as possibilities of rights, and, through this, the racialization when making these choices. With the nomination characteristic of the Law in mind, we defy its role in cultural systems that interact with patrimonialization, which usually make a distinction of the cultural heritage and practices of the hegemonic groups. In this context, the use of the law, through its nomination power, contained in the legal protection of heritage, has been one of the means used to racialize the issue and, consequently, the nation's identity and representation. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the Federal Constitution of 1988 broke with the hegemonic tradition when it allowed indigenous, Afro-Brazilians and other groups to participate in the national civilization process, by opening cracks in the monolith of the monocultural representation of the Nation in the Luso-Brazilian tradition. The methodology used was a critical review of literature.O artigo objetiva discutir como se dão as invenções dos patrimônios como hipóteses de direitos e demonstrar como, através disso, promove-se a racialização da distinção dessas escolhas. Questiona-se aqui a sua função em sistemas culturais que interagem com a patrimonialização, a qual costuma dar distinção às práticas e bens culturais dos grupos hegemônicos. Nesse contexto, o uso do Direito, através do seu poder de nomeação contido nas práticas patrimoniais, tem sido um dos artifícios utilizados para se racializar o patrimônio e, consequentemente, a imagem e a representação da Nação. Como conclusão, demonstra-se que a Constituição Federal de 1988 rompeu com a lógica hegemônica quando permitiu que exemplares das culturas indígenas, afro-brasileiras e de outros grupos participantes do processo civilizatório pátrio abrissem fissuras no monolito da representação monocultural da Nação de tradição luso-brasileira. A metodologia utilizada foi a revisão crítica de literatura.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1122610.32361/2021130211226Revista de Direito; Vol. 13 No. 02 (2021); 01-33Revista de Direito; Vol. 13 Núm. 02 (2021); 01-33Revista de Direito; v. 13 n. 02 (2021); 01-332527-03891806-8790reponame:Revista de Direitoinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11226/6638Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Paulo Fernando Soares2021-06-01T12:25:39Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/11226Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/oairevistadir@ufv.br2527-03891806-8790opendoar:2021-06-01T12:25:39Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith
A invenção dos direitos e a racialização dos patrimônios: a Constituição de 1988 e a desconstrução do monolito monocultural da nação
title The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith
spellingShingle The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith
Pereira, Paulo Fernando Soares
Patrimônio
Invenção
Racismo
Constituição
Representação
Heritage
Inventio
Racism
Constitution
Representation
title_short The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith
title_full The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith
title_fullStr The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith
title_full_unstemmed The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith
title_sort The invention of rights and the racialization of heritage: the 1988 constitution and the deconstruction of the nation's monocultural monolith
author Pereira, Paulo Fernando Soares
author_facet Pereira, Paulo Fernando Soares
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Paulo Fernando Soares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Patrimônio
Invenção
Racismo
Constituição
Representação
Heritage
Inventio
Racism
Constitution
Representation
topic Patrimônio
Invenção
Racismo
Constituição
Representação
Heritage
Inventio
Racism
Constitution
Representation
description The article discusses how "heritage inventions" take place, as possibilities of rights, and, through this, the racialization when making these choices. With the nomination characteristic of the Law in mind, we defy its role in cultural systems that interact with patrimonialization, which usually make a distinction of the cultural heritage and practices of the hegemonic groups. In this context, the use of the law, through its nomination power, contained in the legal protection of heritage, has been one of the means used to racialize the issue and, consequently, the nation's identity and representation. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the Federal Constitution of 1988 broke with the hegemonic tradition when it allowed indigenous, Afro-Brazilians and other groups to participate in the national civilization process, by opening cracks in the monolith of the monocultural representation of the Nation in the Luso-Brazilian tradition. The methodology used was a critical review of literature.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11226
10.32361/2021130211226
url https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11226
identifier_str_mv 10.32361/2021130211226
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/11226/6638
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito; Vol. 13 No. 02 (2021); 01-33
Revista de Direito; Vol. 13 Núm. 02 (2021); 01-33
Revista de Direito; v. 13 n. 02 (2021); 01-33
2527-0389
1806-8790
reponame:Revista de Direito
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Revista de Direito
collection Revista de Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadir@ufv.br
_version_ 1809279553888059392