Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Dávila Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Maia, Gretha Leite
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/14942
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the arguments regarding body cavity search’s constitutionality brought to trial at the STF (Brazilian Supreme Court). To this end, the federal and state norms that regulate the body cavity search were systematized in comparison with the restrictions of fundamental rights caused by this method of inspection, mainly when it comes to the dignity of the human person, the prohibition of torture, the secondary liability, and family assistance to the prisoner. The disputed positions in ARE nº 959.620/RS at the STF and the reasons for the vote of the rapporteur minister were analyzed. It was concluded that the materials seized in body cavity search represent illegal evidence in criminal proceedings. Furthermore, there is no proportionality relationship between the argument of promoting security and public order in order to defend the constitutionality of this procedure at the expense of the restriction to numerous fundamental rights.
id UFV-7_d573f21862756380c2c1e508edfb7e1e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/14942
network_acronym_str UFV-7
network_name_str Revista de Direito
repository_id_str
spelling Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionalityA revista íntima no sistema prisional brasileiro: uma análise sobre a inconstitucionalidade do procedimentoBody cavity searchPrison systemHuman dignityIllicit proofPublic securityRevista íntimaSistema carcerárioDignidade humanaProva ilícitaSegurança públicaThis article aims to analyze the arguments regarding body cavity search’s constitutionality brought to trial at the STF (Brazilian Supreme Court). To this end, the federal and state norms that regulate the body cavity search were systematized in comparison with the restrictions of fundamental rights caused by this method of inspection, mainly when it comes to the dignity of the human person, the prohibition of torture, the secondary liability, and family assistance to the prisoner. The disputed positions in ARE nº 959.620/RS at the STF and the reasons for the vote of the rapporteur minister were analyzed. It was concluded that the materials seized in body cavity search represent illegal evidence in criminal proceedings. Furthermore, there is no proportionality relationship between the argument of promoting security and public order in order to defend the constitutionality of this procedure at the expense of the restriction to numerous fundamental rights.O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar os argumentos trazidos em julgamento, com sede no STF, quanto à constitucionalidade da revista íntima. Para tanto, foram sistematizadas as normas federais e estaduais que regulamentam a revista íntima em cotejo com as restrições de direitos fundamentais acarretadas por esse método de inspeção, especialmente em afronte à dignidade da pessoa humana, à proibição da tortura, à intranscendência da pena e à assistência familiar ao preso. Foram analisadas as posições em disputa no ARE nº 959.620/RS no STF e os fundamentos do voto do ministro relator. Concluiu-se que os materiais apreendidos na realização de revista íntima constituem meio ilícito de prova no processo penal e que não há relação de proporcionalidade entre o argumento da promoção de segurança e ordem pública para defender a constitucionalidade do procedimento diante da constatação de restrição a tantos direitos fundamentais.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2022-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1494210.32361/2022140214942Revista de Direito; Vol. 14 No. 02 (2022); 01-30Revista de Direito; Vol. 14 Núm. 02 (2022); 01-30Revista de Direito; v. 14 n. 02 (2022); 01-302527-03891806-8790reponame:Revista de Direitoinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/14942/7685Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Dávila FerreiraMaia, Gretha Leite2022-12-09T12:53:17Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/14942Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/oairevistadir@ufv.br2527-03891806-8790opendoar:2022-12-09T12:53:17Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality
A revista íntima no sistema prisional brasileiro: uma análise sobre a inconstitucionalidade do procedimento
title Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality
spellingShingle Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality
Ribeiro, Dávila Ferreira
Body cavity search
Prison system
Human dignity
Illicit proof
Public security
Revista íntima
Sistema carcerário
Dignidade humana
Prova ilícita
Segurança pública
title_short Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality
title_full Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality
title_fullStr Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality
title_full_unstemmed Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality
title_sort Body cavity search in the brazilian prison system: an analysis of this procedure’s unconstitutionality
author Ribeiro, Dávila Ferreira
author_facet Ribeiro, Dávila Ferreira
Maia, Gretha Leite
author_role author
author2 Maia, Gretha Leite
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Dávila Ferreira
Maia, Gretha Leite
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Body cavity search
Prison system
Human dignity
Illicit proof
Public security
Revista íntima
Sistema carcerário
Dignidade humana
Prova ilícita
Segurança pública
topic Body cavity search
Prison system
Human dignity
Illicit proof
Public security
Revista íntima
Sistema carcerário
Dignidade humana
Prova ilícita
Segurança pública
description This article aims to analyze the arguments regarding body cavity search’s constitutionality brought to trial at the STF (Brazilian Supreme Court). To this end, the federal and state norms that regulate the body cavity search were systematized in comparison with the restrictions of fundamental rights caused by this method of inspection, mainly when it comes to the dignity of the human person, the prohibition of torture, the secondary liability, and family assistance to the prisoner. The disputed positions in ARE nº 959.620/RS at the STF and the reasons for the vote of the rapporteur minister were analyzed. It was concluded that the materials seized in body cavity search represent illegal evidence in criminal proceedings. Furthermore, there is no proportionality relationship between the argument of promoting security and public order in order to defend the constitutionality of this procedure at the expense of the restriction to numerous fundamental rights.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/14942
10.32361/2022140214942
url https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/14942
identifier_str_mv 10.32361/2022140214942
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/14942/7685
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito; Vol. 14 No. 02 (2022); 01-30
Revista de Direito; Vol. 14 Núm. 02 (2022); 01-30
Revista de Direito; v. 14 n. 02 (2022); 01-30
2527-0389
1806-8790
reponame:Revista de Direito
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Revista de Direito
collection Revista de Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadir@ufv.br
_version_ 1809279554438561792

Registros relacionados