Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, H. R.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lourenco, D. A. L., Masuda, Y., Misztal, I., Tsuruta, S., Jamrozik, J., Brito, L. F., Silva, F. F., Schenkel, F. S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15466
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23944
Resumo: Test-day traits are important for genetic evaluation in dairy cattle and are better modeled by multiple-trait random regression models (RRM). The reliability and bias of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) predicted using multiple-trait RRM via single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) were investigated in the 3 major dairy cattle breeds in Canada (i.e., Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey). Individual additive genomic random regression coefficients for the test-day traits were predicted using 2 multiple-trait RRM: (1) one for milk, fat, and protein yields in the first, second, and third lactations, and (2) one for somatic cell score in the first, second, and third lactations. The predicted coefficients were used to derive GEBV for each lactation day and, subsequently, the daily GEBV were compared with traditional daily parent averages obtained by BLUP. To ensure compatibility between pedigree and genomic information for genotyped animals, different scaling factors for combining the inverse of genomic (G−1) and pedigree (A−122) relationship matrices were tested. In addition, the inclusion of only genotypes from animals with accurate breeding values (defined in preliminary analysis) was compared with the inclusion of all available genotypes in the analyzes. The ssGBLUP model led to considerably larger validation reliabilities than the BLUP model without genomic information. In general, scaling factors used to combine the G−1 and A−122 matrices had small influence on the validation reliabilities. However, a greater effect was observed in the inflation of GEBV. Less inflated GEBV were obtained by the ssGBLUP compared with the parent average from traditional BLUP when using optimal scaling factors to combine the G−1 and A−122 matrices. Similar results were observed when including either all available genotypes or only genotypes from animals with accurate breeding values. These findings indicate that ssGBLUP using multiple-trait RRM increases reliability and reduces bias of breeding values of young animals when compared with parent average from traditional BLUP in the Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds.
id UFV_2caf51db8fbf5829bbb55f267cd6683d
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/23944
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str 2145
spelling Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattleAyrshireHolsteinJerseylongitudinal traitTest-day traits are important for genetic evaluation in dairy cattle and are better modeled by multiple-trait random regression models (RRM). The reliability and bias of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) predicted using multiple-trait RRM via single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) were investigated in the 3 major dairy cattle breeds in Canada (i.e., Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey). Individual additive genomic random regression coefficients for the test-day traits were predicted using 2 multiple-trait RRM: (1) one for milk, fat, and protein yields in the first, second, and third lactations, and (2) one for somatic cell score in the first, second, and third lactations. The predicted coefficients were used to derive GEBV for each lactation day and, subsequently, the daily GEBV were compared with traditional daily parent averages obtained by BLUP. To ensure compatibility between pedigree and genomic information for genotyped animals, different scaling factors for combining the inverse of genomic (G−1) and pedigree (A−122) relationship matrices were tested. In addition, the inclusion of only genotypes from animals with accurate breeding values (defined in preliminary analysis) was compared with the inclusion of all available genotypes in the analyzes. The ssGBLUP model led to considerably larger validation reliabilities than the BLUP model without genomic information. In general, scaling factors used to combine the G−1 and A−122 matrices had small influence on the validation reliabilities. However, a greater effect was observed in the inflation of GEBV. Less inflated GEBV were obtained by the ssGBLUP compared with the parent average from traditional BLUP when using optimal scaling factors to combine the G−1 and A−122 matrices. Similar results were observed when including either all available genotypes or only genotypes from animals with accurate breeding values. These findings indicate that ssGBLUP using multiple-trait RRM increases reliability and reduces bias of breeding values of young animals when compared with parent average from traditional BLUP in the Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds.Journal of Dairy Science2019-03-14T17:32:03Z2019-03-14T17:32:03Z2019-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepdfapplication/pdf0022-0302https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15466http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23944engVolume 102, Issue 3, Pages 2365-2377, March 2019American Dairy Science Associationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, H. R.Lourenco, D. A. L.Masuda, Y.Misztal, I.Tsuruta, S.Jamrozik, J.Brito, L. F.Silva, F. F.Schenkel, F. S.reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV2024-07-12T07:14:16Zoai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/23944Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452024-07-12T07:14:16LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle
title Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle
spellingShingle Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle
Oliveira, H. R.
Ayrshire
Holstein
Jersey
longitudinal trait
title_short Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle
title_full Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle
title_fullStr Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle
title_full_unstemmed Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle
title_sort Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle
author Oliveira, H. R.
author_facet Oliveira, H. R.
Lourenco, D. A. L.
Masuda, Y.
Misztal, I.
Tsuruta, S.
Jamrozik, J.
Brito, L. F.
Silva, F. F.
Schenkel, F. S.
author_role author
author2 Lourenco, D. A. L.
Masuda, Y.
Misztal, I.
Tsuruta, S.
Jamrozik, J.
Brito, L. F.
Silva, F. F.
Schenkel, F. S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, H. R.
Lourenco, D. A. L.
Masuda, Y.
Misztal, I.
Tsuruta, S.
Jamrozik, J.
Brito, L. F.
Silva, F. F.
Schenkel, F. S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ayrshire
Holstein
Jersey
longitudinal trait
topic Ayrshire
Holstein
Jersey
longitudinal trait
description Test-day traits are important for genetic evaluation in dairy cattle and are better modeled by multiple-trait random regression models (RRM). The reliability and bias of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) predicted using multiple-trait RRM via single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) were investigated in the 3 major dairy cattle breeds in Canada (i.e., Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey). Individual additive genomic random regression coefficients for the test-day traits were predicted using 2 multiple-trait RRM: (1) one for milk, fat, and protein yields in the first, second, and third lactations, and (2) one for somatic cell score in the first, second, and third lactations. The predicted coefficients were used to derive GEBV for each lactation day and, subsequently, the daily GEBV were compared with traditional daily parent averages obtained by BLUP. To ensure compatibility between pedigree and genomic information for genotyped animals, different scaling factors for combining the inverse of genomic (G−1) and pedigree (A−122) relationship matrices were tested. In addition, the inclusion of only genotypes from animals with accurate breeding values (defined in preliminary analysis) was compared with the inclusion of all available genotypes in the analyzes. The ssGBLUP model led to considerably larger validation reliabilities than the BLUP model without genomic information. In general, scaling factors used to combine the G−1 and A−122 matrices had small influence on the validation reliabilities. However, a greater effect was observed in the inflation of GEBV. Less inflated GEBV were obtained by the ssGBLUP compared with the parent average from traditional BLUP when using optimal scaling factors to combine the G−1 and A−122 matrices. Similar results were observed when including either all available genotypes or only genotypes from animals with accurate breeding values. These findings indicate that ssGBLUP using multiple-trait RRM increases reliability and reduces bias of breeding values of young animals when compared with parent average from traditional BLUP in the Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-14T17:32:03Z
2019-03-14T17:32:03Z
2019-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 0022-0302
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15466
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23944
identifier_str_mv 0022-0302
url https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15466
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23944
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 2365-2377, March 2019
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv American Dairy Science Association
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv American Dairy Science Association
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Dairy Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Dairy Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1817559911248166912