Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, F. C. Esteves de
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Cruz, A. C. de Mello, Oliveira, C. Gonçalves, Cruz, A. C. Rodrigues Ferreira, Nakajima, V. Mayumi, Bressan, J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
Texto Completo: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112008000800006
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/12529
Resumo: There are many available methods to measure the human energy consumption. Due to the high cost and small number of laboratories able to perform it, the direct calorimetry and doubly labeled water technique are rarely used to measure the energy expenditure. As consequence, there is an increase use of the indirect calorimetry and bioelectrical impedance analysis methods by researchers and predictive equations by physicians to calculate the total energy requirements in research and in clinic. Objective: To evaluate the basal energy expenditure (GEB) and total energy expenditure (GET) of healthy subjects comparing results of indirect calorimetry (CI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and predictive equations such as estimated energy requirements (EER), Fleish, FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001. Material and methods: It was evaluated the energy expenditure in 81 subjects of both gender by CI and BIA. Of these, the GEB by predictive equations FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001 and the GET by EER, Fleisch and FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001 were calculated. The data was analyzed with the software Sigma Stat for Windows version 2.03 and Dunn's test was used for comparison of mean obtained with methods and equations (p < 0.05). Results: It was verified that 60.5% of the participants were men. The majority of subjects were eutrofic. BIA showed significant differences between men and women. The differences between the values of GEB, obtained by BIA and CI, were statistically significant only for women (p < 0.05) with an underestimation of the GEB results obtained by BIA in relation to those obtained by CI. Significant difference was found between the predictive equations and CI for both sexes, also demonstrating an underestimation of the equations in relation to CI. It was observed an overestimation of GET with the predictive equations of FAO/WHO/UNU/85 and 2001 in relation to EER and Fleisch for both sexes. The estimation of GEB can be carried out by both BIA and CI, although BIA must be used with criteria since it underestimates in a significant way for women. In relation to the predictive equations, overestimation can develop positive energy balance in populations with risks for overweight and obesity. Thus, it is necessary comparisons to identify the limitations of each method.
id UFV_3a4b188a70a2ac25c7fa7d75d7cca1e6
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/12529
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str 2145
spelling Oliveira, F. C. Esteves deCruz, A. C. de MelloOliveira, C. GonçalvesCruz, A. C. Rodrigues FerreiraNakajima, V. MayumiBressan, J.2017-10-30T15:53:31Z2017-10-30T15:53:31Z2008-05-151699-5198http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112008000800006http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/12529There are many available methods to measure the human energy consumption. Due to the high cost and small number of laboratories able to perform it, the direct calorimetry and doubly labeled water technique are rarely used to measure the energy expenditure. As consequence, there is an increase use of the indirect calorimetry and bioelectrical impedance analysis methods by researchers and predictive equations by physicians to calculate the total energy requirements in research and in clinic. Objective: To evaluate the basal energy expenditure (GEB) and total energy expenditure (GET) of healthy subjects comparing results of indirect calorimetry (CI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and predictive equations such as estimated energy requirements (EER), Fleish, FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001. Material and methods: It was evaluated the energy expenditure in 81 subjects of both gender by CI and BIA. Of these, the GEB by predictive equations FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001 and the GET by EER, Fleisch and FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001 were calculated. The data was analyzed with the software Sigma Stat for Windows version 2.03 and Dunn's test was used for comparison of mean obtained with methods and equations (p < 0.05). Results: It was verified that 60.5% of the participants were men. The majority of subjects were eutrofic. BIA showed significant differences between men and women. The differences between the values of GEB, obtained by BIA and CI, were statistically significant only for women (p < 0.05) with an underestimation of the GEB results obtained by BIA in relation to those obtained by CI. Significant difference was found between the predictive equations and CI for both sexes, also demonstrating an underestimation of the equations in relation to CI. It was observed an overestimation of GET with the predictive equations of FAO/WHO/UNU/85 and 2001 in relation to EER and Fleisch for both sexes. The estimation of GEB can be carried out by both BIA and CI, although BIA must be used with criteria since it underestimates in a significant way for women. In relation to the predictive equations, overestimation can develop positive energy balance in populations with risks for overweight and obesity. Thus, it is necessary comparisons to identify the limitations of each method.Hay diversos métodos disponibles para medir el consumo de energía en el ser humano. Debido al alto costo y pequeño número de laboratorios capaces de utilizar la calorimetría directa y la técnica del agua doblemente marcada, se ha realizado un número relativamente pequeño de mediciones del gasto energético utilizándose estos métodos. Así, cada día más, los investigadores se atienen en alto grado a los métodos de calorimetría indirecta (CI) y bioimpedancia eléctrica (BIA) y los clínicos a las ecuaciones de predicción para calcular los requerimientos de energía total en sus estudios y pacientes respectivamente. Evaluar el Gasto Energético Basal (GEB) y el Gasto Energético Total (GET) de individuos saludables comparando los resultados de CI, BIA y ecuaciones predictivas con los de requerimiento estimado de energía (EER), Fleisch, FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 y 2001. Se evaluó el gasto energético en 81 individuos de ambos sexos por CI y BIA. De estos, fueron calculados el GEB por las ecuaciones FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 y 2001 y el GET por EER, Fleisch y FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 y 2001. Los datos se analizaron con el programa Sigma Stat for Windows versión 2.03 y se utilizó eltest de Dunn's para la comparación de las medianas obtenidas por los métodos y ecuaciones (p < 0,05). Resultados: Se verificó que el 60,5% de los participantes eran hombres. Los individuos en su mayoría eran eutróficos. La BIA mostró diferencias significativas entre los sexos. Las medianas de GEB, obtenidas por BIA y CI, presentaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas solamente para mujeres (p < 0,05) con una subestimación de los resultados del GEB obtenidos por la BIA en relación a los obtenidos por CI. Diferencias significativas fueron encontradas entre las fórmulas predictivas y la CI para ambos sexos, demostrando también una subestimación de esas en relación a la CI. Se observó una sobreestimación de GET con las fórmulas predictivas de la FAO/WHO/UNU/85 y 2001 en relación a la EER y Fleisch, para ambos sexos. La estimación del GEB puede ser realizada tanto por BIA como por CI, pero la BIA debe ser usada con criterios, ya que subestima de forma significativa para mujeres. En relación a las ecuaciones predictivas se puede observar que la sobreestimación puede desarrollar un balance energético positivo en poblaciones con riesgos para el sobrepeso y obesidad. Así son necesarias comparaciones para identificar las limitaciones de cada método.spaNutrición Hospitalaria23(6): p. 554-561, Nov./Dec. 2008Calorimetría indirectaBioimpedanciaGasto energético totalGasto energético basalEcuaciones predictivasGasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINALoriginal3.pdforiginal3.pdftexto completoapplication/pdf86744https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/12529/1/original3.pdfbe1df2d0125d6044b4745035fb45e417MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/12529/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52THUMBNAILoriginal3.pdf.jpgoriginal3.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4509https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/12529/3/original3.pdf.jpgd5f9c21c873d1194e41f064b3f48d06dMD53123456789/125292017-10-30 22:00:30.209oai:locus.ufv.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452017-10-31T01:00:30LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.es.fl_str_mv Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos
title Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos
spellingShingle Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos
Oliveira, F. C. Esteves de
Calorimetría indirecta
Bioimpedancia
Gasto energético total
Gasto energético basal
Ecuaciones predictivas
title_short Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos
title_full Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos
title_fullStr Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos
title_full_unstemmed Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos
title_sort Gasto energético de adultos brasileños saludables: una comparación de métodos
author Oliveira, F. C. Esteves de
author_facet Oliveira, F. C. Esteves de
Cruz, A. C. de Mello
Oliveira, C. Gonçalves
Cruz, A. C. Rodrigues Ferreira
Nakajima, V. Mayumi
Bressan, J.
author_role author
author2 Cruz, A. C. de Mello
Oliveira, C. Gonçalves
Cruz, A. C. Rodrigues Ferreira
Nakajima, V. Mayumi
Bressan, J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, F. C. Esteves de
Cruz, A. C. de Mello
Oliveira, C. Gonçalves
Cruz, A. C. Rodrigues Ferreira
Nakajima, V. Mayumi
Bressan, J.
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Calorimetría indirecta
Bioimpedancia
Gasto energético total
Gasto energético basal
Ecuaciones predictivas
topic Calorimetría indirecta
Bioimpedancia
Gasto energético total
Gasto energético basal
Ecuaciones predictivas
description There are many available methods to measure the human energy consumption. Due to the high cost and small number of laboratories able to perform it, the direct calorimetry and doubly labeled water technique are rarely used to measure the energy expenditure. As consequence, there is an increase use of the indirect calorimetry and bioelectrical impedance analysis methods by researchers and predictive equations by physicians to calculate the total energy requirements in research and in clinic. Objective: To evaluate the basal energy expenditure (GEB) and total energy expenditure (GET) of healthy subjects comparing results of indirect calorimetry (CI), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and predictive equations such as estimated energy requirements (EER), Fleish, FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001. Material and methods: It was evaluated the energy expenditure in 81 subjects of both gender by CI and BIA. Of these, the GEB by predictive equations FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001 and the GET by EER, Fleisch and FAO/WHO/UNU 1985 and 2001 were calculated. The data was analyzed with the software Sigma Stat for Windows version 2.03 and Dunn's test was used for comparison of mean obtained with methods and equations (p < 0.05). Results: It was verified that 60.5% of the participants were men. The majority of subjects were eutrofic. BIA showed significant differences between men and women. The differences between the values of GEB, obtained by BIA and CI, were statistically significant only for women (p < 0.05) with an underestimation of the GEB results obtained by BIA in relation to those obtained by CI. Significant difference was found between the predictive equations and CI for both sexes, also demonstrating an underestimation of the equations in relation to CI. It was observed an overestimation of GET with the predictive equations of FAO/WHO/UNU/85 and 2001 in relation to EER and Fleisch for both sexes. The estimation of GEB can be carried out by both BIA and CI, although BIA must be used with criteria since it underestimates in a significant way for women. In relation to the predictive equations, overestimation can develop positive energy balance in populations with risks for overweight and obesity. Thus, it is necessary comparisons to identify the limitations of each method.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2008-05-15
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-10-30T15:53:31Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-10-30T15:53:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112008000800006
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/12529
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1699-5198
identifier_str_mv 1699-5198
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-16112008000800006
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/12529
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartofseries.pt-BR.fl_str_mv 23(6): p. 554-561, Nov./Dec. 2008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nutrición Hospitalaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nutrición Hospitalaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/12529/1/original3.pdf
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/12529/2/license.txt
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/12529/3/original3.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv be1df2d0125d6044b4745035fb45e417
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
d5f9c21c873d1194e41f064b3f48d06d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1801212949967142912