Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000300018 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/14828 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to assess the bionutritional efficiency of crossbred F1 Red Angus × Nellore (½ RA ½ N) and F1 Blonde D'Aquitaine × Nellore (½ BA ½ N) young bulls finished on feedlot and slaughtered at 480, 520 and 560 kg body weight. A completely randomized experimental design in a 2 × 3 (genetic group × slaughter weight) factorial arrangement with six replicates was used. The ½ BA ½ N young bulls showed higher kidney, pelvic and inguinal fat (KPIF, kg and % BW) and lower multivariate biological nutritional index (MBNI) and residual feed intake than ½ RA ½ N young bulls. The young bulls slaughtered at heavier weight had larger ribeye area (cm2), fat thickness over the 12-13th rib, fat thickness over the rump, KPIF (kg and % BW), dry matter intake (DMI, kg/d), net energy intake (MJ/d) and metabolizable protein intake (g/d), and MBNI compared to young bulls slaughtered at lighter weight. Furthermore, the ½ BA ½ N young bulls slaughtered at 480 kg had lower feed conversion than the others. On the other hand, the average daily weight gain (kg/d), DMI (% BW and g/BW0.75), feed efficiency and Kleiber ratio did not differ between genetic group, slaughter weight and genetic group versus slaughter weight interaction. Therefore, crossbred F1 Blonde D'Aquitaine × Nellore young bulls and animals slaughtered at lighter weights are more bionutritionally efficient in the finishing phase on feedlot. |
id |
UFV_3c2767347d89a53cfc8b626b0239ed48 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/14828 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV |
network_name_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository_id_str |
2145 |
spelling |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weightsAnimal performanceFeed efficiencyFeed conversionKleiber ratioMultivariate biological nutritional indexResidual feed intakeThe objective of this study was to assess the bionutritional efficiency of crossbred F1 Red Angus × Nellore (½ RA ½ N) and F1 Blonde D'Aquitaine × Nellore (½ BA ½ N) young bulls finished on feedlot and slaughtered at 480, 520 and 560 kg body weight. A completely randomized experimental design in a 2 × 3 (genetic group × slaughter weight) factorial arrangement with six replicates was used. The ½ BA ½ N young bulls showed higher kidney, pelvic and inguinal fat (KPIF, kg and % BW) and lower multivariate biological nutritional index (MBNI) and residual feed intake than ½ RA ½ N young bulls. The young bulls slaughtered at heavier weight had larger ribeye area (cm2), fat thickness over the 12-13th rib, fat thickness over the rump, KPIF (kg and % BW), dry matter intake (DMI, kg/d), net energy intake (MJ/d) and metabolizable protein intake (g/d), and MBNI compared to young bulls slaughtered at lighter weight. Furthermore, the ½ BA ½ N young bulls slaughtered at 480 kg had lower feed conversion than the others. On the other hand, the average daily weight gain (kg/d), DMI (% BW and g/BW0.75), feed efficiency and Kleiber ratio did not differ between genetic group, slaughter weight and genetic group versus slaughter weight interaction. Therefore, crossbred F1 Blonde D'Aquitaine × Nellore young bulls and animals slaughtered at lighter weights are more bionutritionally efficient in the finishing phase on feedlot.Objetivou-se avaliar a eficiência bionutricional de tourinhos mestiços F1 Red Angus × Nelore (½ RA ½ N) e F1 Blonde D'Aquitane × Nelore (½ BA ½ N) terminados em confinamento e abatidos com 480, 520 e 560 kg de peso corporal. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado em arranjo fatorial 2 × 3 (grupo genético × peso de abate) com seis repetições. Os tourinhos ½ BA ½ N tiveram maior gordura renal, pélvica e inguinal (GRPI, kg e % PV); e menor índice nutricional multivariado biológico (INMB) e consumo alimentar residual em comparação aos tourinhos ½ RA ½ N. Os tourinhos abatidos com maior peso apresentaram maior área de olho-de-lombo (cm2), espessura de gordura subcutânea, gordura de cobertura na garupa, GRPI (kg e % PV), consumo de matéria seca (CMS, kg/d), consumo de energia líquida (MJ/d) e proteína metabolizável (g/dia), e INMB em relação aos abatidos mais leves. Além disso, os tourinhos ½ BA ½ N abatidos com 480 kg tiveram a menor conversão alimentar. Por outro lado, o ganho médio diário de peso (kg/dia), o consumo de matéria seca (% PV e g/UTM), a eficiência alimentar e a relação de Kleiber não diferiram entre os grupos genéticos, os pesos de abate e a interação grupo genético versus peso de abate. Tourinhos F1 Blonde D'Aquitaine × Nelore e os animais abatidos mais leves são bionutricionalmente mais eficientes na fase de terminação em confinamento.Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia2017-12-12T12:21:10Z2017-12-12T12:21:10Z2009-06-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepdfapplication/pdf18069290http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000300018http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/14828engv. 39, n. 3, p. 582-593, Mar. 2010Mello, ReniusQueiroz, Augusto César deResende, Flávio Dutra deFaria, Marcelo Henrique deHenrique, Douglas SampaioMaldonado, Fabianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV2024-07-12T07:50:54Zoai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/14828Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452024-07-12T07:50:54LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights |
title |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights |
spellingShingle |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights Mello, Renius Animal performance Feed efficiency Feed conversion Kleiber ratio Multivariate biological nutritional index Residual feed intake |
title_short |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights |
title_full |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights |
title_fullStr |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights |
title_sort |
Bionutritional efficiency of crossbred beef cattle finished on feedlot andslaughtered at different body weights |
author |
Mello, Renius |
author_facet |
Mello, Renius Queiroz, Augusto César de Resende, Flávio Dutra de Faria, Marcelo Henrique de Henrique, Douglas Sampaio Maldonado, Fabiana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Queiroz, Augusto César de Resende, Flávio Dutra de Faria, Marcelo Henrique de Henrique, Douglas Sampaio Maldonado, Fabiana |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mello, Renius Queiroz, Augusto César de Resende, Flávio Dutra de Faria, Marcelo Henrique de Henrique, Douglas Sampaio Maldonado, Fabiana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal performance Feed efficiency Feed conversion Kleiber ratio Multivariate biological nutritional index Residual feed intake |
topic |
Animal performance Feed efficiency Feed conversion Kleiber ratio Multivariate biological nutritional index Residual feed intake |
description |
The objective of this study was to assess the bionutritional efficiency of crossbred F1 Red Angus × Nellore (½ RA ½ N) and F1 Blonde D'Aquitaine × Nellore (½ BA ½ N) young bulls finished on feedlot and slaughtered at 480, 520 and 560 kg body weight. A completely randomized experimental design in a 2 × 3 (genetic group × slaughter weight) factorial arrangement with six replicates was used. The ½ BA ½ N young bulls showed higher kidney, pelvic and inguinal fat (KPIF, kg and % BW) and lower multivariate biological nutritional index (MBNI) and residual feed intake than ½ RA ½ N young bulls. The young bulls slaughtered at heavier weight had larger ribeye area (cm2), fat thickness over the 12-13th rib, fat thickness over the rump, KPIF (kg and % BW), dry matter intake (DMI, kg/d), net energy intake (MJ/d) and metabolizable protein intake (g/d), and MBNI compared to young bulls slaughtered at lighter weight. Furthermore, the ½ BA ½ N young bulls slaughtered at 480 kg had lower feed conversion than the others. On the other hand, the average daily weight gain (kg/d), DMI (% BW and g/BW0.75), feed efficiency and Kleiber ratio did not differ between genetic group, slaughter weight and genetic group versus slaughter weight interaction. Therefore, crossbred F1 Blonde D'Aquitaine × Nellore young bulls and animals slaughtered at lighter weights are more bionutritionally efficient in the finishing phase on feedlot. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-06-16 2017-12-12T12:21:10Z 2017-12-12T12:21:10Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
18069290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000300018 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/14828 |
identifier_str_mv |
18069290 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000300018 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/14828 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
v. 39, n. 3, p. 582-593, Mar. 2010 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
collection |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fabiojreis@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1822610665484845056 |