Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Camila Soares
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Marcondes, Marcos Inácio, Silva, Alex Lopes da, Gionbelli, Tathyane Ramalho Santos, Novaes, Marco Aurélio Schiavo, Knupp, Leonardo Sidney, Virginio Júnior, Gercino Ferreira, Veloso, Cristina Mattos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259
https://locus.ufv.br//handle/123456789/31667
Resumo: This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.
id UFV_3e03713d24c1f954ddd844ce165b95b2
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/31667
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str 2145
spelling Cunha, Camila SoaresMarcondes, Marcos InácioSilva, Alex Lopes daGionbelli, Tathyane Ramalho SantosNovaes, Marco Aurélio SchiavoKnupp, Leonardo SidneyVirginio Júnior, Gercino FerreiraVeloso, Cristina Mattos2023-10-20T14:59:57Z2023-10-20T14:59:57Z2019-07-15CUNHA, C. S.; MARCONDES, M. I.; SILVA, A. L.; GIONBELLI, T. R. S.; NOVAES, M. A. S.; KNUPP, L. S.; VIRGINIO JÚNIOR, G. F.; VELOSO, C. M. Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 48, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/rbz48201802591806-9290https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259https://locus.ufv.br//handle/123456789/3166710.1590/rbz4820180259This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.engBrazilian Journal of Animal Sciencev. 48, p. 01-10, 2019Creative Commons Attribution Licenseinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDigestibilityFeed additiveIntakePHRuminal ammoniaVolatile fatty acidsDo live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINAL1806-9290-rbz-48-e20180259.pdf1806-9290-rbz-48-e20180259.pdfartigoapplication/pdf319638https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/31667/1/1806-9290-rbz-48-e20180259.pdfad4b6362d4c04e837d4f807981534ff4MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/31667/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52123456789/316672023-10-20 11:59:57.989oai:locus.ufv.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452023-10-20T14:59:57LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
spellingShingle Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
Cunha, Camila Soares
Digestibility
Feed additive
Intake
PH
Ruminal ammonia
Volatile fatty acids
title_short Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_full Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_fullStr Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_full_unstemmed Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_sort Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
author Cunha, Camila Soares
author_facet Cunha, Camila Soares
Marcondes, Marcos Inácio
Silva, Alex Lopes da
Gionbelli, Tathyane Ramalho Santos
Novaes, Marco Aurélio Schiavo
Knupp, Leonardo Sidney
Virginio Júnior, Gercino Ferreira
Veloso, Cristina Mattos
author_role author
author2 Marcondes, Marcos Inácio
Silva, Alex Lopes da
Gionbelli, Tathyane Ramalho Santos
Novaes, Marco Aurélio Schiavo
Knupp, Leonardo Sidney
Virginio Júnior, Gercino Ferreira
Veloso, Cristina Mattos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Camila Soares
Marcondes, Marcos Inácio
Silva, Alex Lopes da
Gionbelli, Tathyane Ramalho Santos
Novaes, Marco Aurélio Schiavo
Knupp, Leonardo Sidney
Virginio Júnior, Gercino Ferreira
Veloso, Cristina Mattos
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Digestibility
Feed additive
Intake
PH
Ruminal ammonia
Volatile fatty acids
topic Digestibility
Feed additive
Intake
PH
Ruminal ammonia
Volatile fatty acids
description This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-07-15
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-10-20T14:59:57Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-10-20T14:59:57Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv CUNHA, C. S.; MARCONDES, M. I.; SILVA, A. L.; GIONBELLI, T. R. S.; NOVAES, M. A. S.; KNUPP, L. S.; VIRGINIO JÚNIOR, G. F.; VELOSO, C. M. Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 48, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/rbz4820180259
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259
https://locus.ufv.br//handle/123456789/31667
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1806-9290
dc.identifier.doi.pt-BR.fl_str_mv 10.1590/rbz4820180259
identifier_str_mv CUNHA, C. S.; MARCONDES, M. I.; SILVA, A. L.; GIONBELLI, T. R. S.; NOVAES, M. A. S.; KNUPP, L. S.; VIRGINIO JÚNIOR, G. F.; VELOSO, C. M. Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 48, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/rbz4820180259
1806-9290
10.1590/rbz4820180259
url https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259
https://locus.ufv.br//handle/123456789/31667
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.pt-BR.fl_str_mv v. 48, p. 01-10, 2019
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Creative Commons Attribution License
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Creative Commons Attribution License
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Animal Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Animal Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/31667/1/1806-9290-rbz-48-e20180259.pdf
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/31667/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ad4b6362d4c04e837d4f807981534ff4
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1801213030512459776