Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9927-9 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23468 |
Resumo: | Maintaining pure cultures using preservation methods is of high importance for biotechnological purposes. However, preservation does not necessarily guarantee the genetic stability of these cultures. Therefore, preservation methods are currently needed to assure viability as well as genetic, physiological, and morphological integrity across storage periods. In this study, preservation of five isolates from the microalgae and cyanobacteria collection of the Plant Biology Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil was investigated via monthly analyses of cell viability, biomass recovery, and contaminant concentrations over a period of 120 days. Lyophilization was adequate for both heterocystous cyanobacteria and other strains that were able to differentiate hormogones or to synthesize thick layers of exopolysaccharides. Lyophilization was also able to maintain cultures with low levels of contaminants. Dimethyl sulfoxide was relatively efficient, though some of the strains were susceptible to its cytotoxic effects. Our results demonstrated that cryopreservation with glycerol was the most efficient method. The ability to routinely preserve cyanobacterial strains reduces costs associated with maintaining large culture collections and reduces the risks of losing particular strains or species through contamination and genetic drift. The results obtained in this study are therefore discussed in the context of the efficiency of the methods and the current need to develop suitable methods for maintenance of cyanobacterial collections. |
id |
UFV_6113e6650bd0a59bbd97f3bdf59c3da9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/23468 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV |
network_name_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository_id_str |
2145 |
spelling |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strainsCyanobacteriaPreservation methodsLyophilizationCryopreservationCyanobacterial collectionsMaintaining pure cultures using preservation methods is of high importance for biotechnological purposes. However, preservation does not necessarily guarantee the genetic stability of these cultures. Therefore, preservation methods are currently needed to assure viability as well as genetic, physiological, and morphological integrity across storage periods. In this study, preservation of five isolates from the microalgae and cyanobacteria collection of the Plant Biology Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil was investigated via monthly analyses of cell viability, biomass recovery, and contaminant concentrations over a period of 120 days. Lyophilization was adequate for both heterocystous cyanobacteria and other strains that were able to differentiate hormogones or to synthesize thick layers of exopolysaccharides. Lyophilization was also able to maintain cultures with low levels of contaminants. Dimethyl sulfoxide was relatively efficient, though some of the strains were susceptible to its cytotoxic effects. Our results demonstrated that cryopreservation with glycerol was the most efficient method. The ability to routinely preserve cyanobacterial strains reduces costs associated with maintaining large culture collections and reduces the risks of losing particular strains or species through contamination and genetic drift. The results obtained in this study are therefore discussed in the context of the efficiency of the methods and the current need to develop suitable methods for maintenance of cyanobacterial collections.Journal of Applied Phycology2019-02-11T12:44:28Z2019-02-11T12:44:28Z2013-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepdfapplication/pdf1573-5176https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9927-9http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23468engVolume 25, Issue 4, Pages 919– 929, August 2013Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsteves-Ferreira, Alberto A.Corrêa, Débora M.Carneiro, Antônio P. S.Rosa, Rinamara M.Loterio, RobsonAraújo, Wagner L.reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV2024-07-12T07:01:29Zoai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/23468Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452024-07-12T07:01:29LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains |
title |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains |
spellingShingle |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A. Cyanobacteria Preservation methods Lyophilization Cryopreservation Cyanobacterial collections |
title_short |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains |
title_full |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains |
title_fullStr |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains |
title_sort |
Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains |
author |
Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A. |
author_facet |
Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A. Corrêa, Débora M. Carneiro, Antônio P. S. Rosa, Rinamara M. Loterio, Robson Araújo, Wagner L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Corrêa, Débora M. Carneiro, Antônio P. S. Rosa, Rinamara M. Loterio, Robson Araújo, Wagner L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A. Corrêa, Débora M. Carneiro, Antônio P. S. Rosa, Rinamara M. Loterio, Robson Araújo, Wagner L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cyanobacteria Preservation methods Lyophilization Cryopreservation Cyanobacterial collections |
topic |
Cyanobacteria Preservation methods Lyophilization Cryopreservation Cyanobacterial collections |
description |
Maintaining pure cultures using preservation methods is of high importance for biotechnological purposes. However, preservation does not necessarily guarantee the genetic stability of these cultures. Therefore, preservation methods are currently needed to assure viability as well as genetic, physiological, and morphological integrity across storage periods. In this study, preservation of five isolates from the microalgae and cyanobacteria collection of the Plant Biology Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil was investigated via monthly analyses of cell viability, biomass recovery, and contaminant concentrations over a period of 120 days. Lyophilization was adequate for both heterocystous cyanobacteria and other strains that were able to differentiate hormogones or to synthesize thick layers of exopolysaccharides. Lyophilization was also able to maintain cultures with low levels of contaminants. Dimethyl sulfoxide was relatively efficient, though some of the strains were susceptible to its cytotoxic effects. Our results demonstrated that cryopreservation with glycerol was the most efficient method. The ability to routinely preserve cyanobacterial strains reduces costs associated with maintaining large culture collections and reduces the risks of losing particular strains or species through contamination and genetic drift. The results obtained in this study are therefore discussed in the context of the efficiency of the methods and the current need to develop suitable methods for maintenance of cyanobacterial collections. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08 2019-02-11T12:44:28Z 2019-02-11T12:44:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
1573-5176 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9927-9 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23468 |
identifier_str_mv |
1573-5176 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9927-9 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23468 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 919– 929, August 2013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Phycology |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Phycology |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
collection |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fabiojreis@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1822610595716792320 |