Legislative vulnerability of minority groups
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320172212.24842017 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16520 |
Resumo: | Minorities are in an inferior position in society and therefore vulnerable in many aspects. This study analyzes legislative vulnerability and aims to categorize as “weak” or “strong” the protection conferred by law to the following minorities: elderly, disabled, LGBT, Indians, women, children/ adolescents and black people. In order to do so, it was developed a documental research in 30 federal laws in which legal provisions were searched to protect minorities. Next, the articles were organized in the following categories: civil, criminal, administrative, labor and procedural, to be analyzed afterwards. Legal protection was considered “strong” when there were legal provisions that observed the five categories and “weak” when it did not meet this criterion. It was noted that six groups have “strong” legislative protection, which elides the assertion that minorities are outside the law. The exception is the LGBT group, whose legislative protection is weak. In addition, consecrating rights through laws strengthens the institutional channels for minorities to demand their rights. Finally, it was observed that the legislative protection granted tominorities is not homogeneous but rather discriminatory, and there is an interference by the majority group in the rights regulation of vulnerable groups. |
id |
UFV_7760718701b9b057d63ff6af665b593e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/16520 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV |
network_name_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository_id_str |
2145 |
spelling |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groupsVulnerability analysisLegislation as topicMinorities are in an inferior position in society and therefore vulnerable in many aspects. This study analyzes legislative vulnerability and aims to categorize as “weak” or “strong” the protection conferred by law to the following minorities: elderly, disabled, LGBT, Indians, women, children/ adolescents and black people. In order to do so, it was developed a documental research in 30 federal laws in which legal provisions were searched to protect minorities. Next, the articles were organized in the following categories: civil, criminal, administrative, labor and procedural, to be analyzed afterwards. Legal protection was considered “strong” when there were legal provisions that observed the five categories and “weak” when it did not meet this criterion. It was noted that six groups have “strong” legislative protection, which elides the assertion that minorities are outside the law. The exception is the LGBT group, whose legislative protection is weak. In addition, consecrating rights through laws strengthens the institutional channels for minorities to demand their rights. Finally, it was observed that the legislative protection granted tominorities is not homogeneous but rather discriminatory, and there is an interference by the majority group in the rights regulation of vulnerable groups.Ciência & Saúde Coletiva2018-01-19T09:21:29Z2018-01-19T09:21:29Z2017-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepdfapplication/pdf1678-4561http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320172212.24842017http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16520eng22(12), p.3841-3848, Dec. 2017Paula, Carlos Eduardo ArtiagaSilva, Ana Paula daBittar, Cléria Maria Lôboinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV2024-07-12T07:25:50Zoai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/16520Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452024-07-12T07:25:50LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groups |
title |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groups |
spellingShingle |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groups Paula, Carlos Eduardo Artiaga Vulnerability analysis Legislation as topic |
title_short |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groups |
title_full |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groups |
title_fullStr |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groups |
title_full_unstemmed |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groups |
title_sort |
Legislative vulnerability of minority groups |
author |
Paula, Carlos Eduardo Artiaga |
author_facet |
Paula, Carlos Eduardo Artiaga Silva, Ana Paula da Bittar, Cléria Maria Lôbo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Ana Paula da Bittar, Cléria Maria Lôbo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paula, Carlos Eduardo Artiaga Silva, Ana Paula da Bittar, Cléria Maria Lôbo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vulnerability analysis Legislation as topic |
topic |
Vulnerability analysis Legislation as topic |
description |
Minorities are in an inferior position in society and therefore vulnerable in many aspects. This study analyzes legislative vulnerability and aims to categorize as “weak” or “strong” the protection conferred by law to the following minorities: elderly, disabled, LGBT, Indians, women, children/ adolescents and black people. In order to do so, it was developed a documental research in 30 federal laws in which legal provisions were searched to protect minorities. Next, the articles were organized in the following categories: civil, criminal, administrative, labor and procedural, to be analyzed afterwards. Legal protection was considered “strong” when there were legal provisions that observed the five categories and “weak” when it did not meet this criterion. It was noted that six groups have “strong” legislative protection, which elides the assertion that minorities are outside the law. The exception is the LGBT group, whose legislative protection is weak. In addition, consecrating rights through laws strengthens the institutional channels for minorities to demand their rights. Finally, it was observed that the legislative protection granted tominorities is not homogeneous but rather discriminatory, and there is an interference by the majority group in the rights regulation of vulnerable groups. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-02 2018-01-19T09:21:29Z 2018-01-19T09:21:29Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
1678-4561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320172212.24842017 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16520 |
identifier_str_mv |
1678-4561 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320172212.24842017 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16520 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
22(12), p.3841-3848, Dec. 2017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
collection |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fabiojreis@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1817559928917721088 |