Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Meira, Renata Maria Strozi Alves, Ferreira, Francisco Affonso, Sant’Anna-Santos, Bruno Francisco, Ferreira, Lino Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.09.010
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/22180
Resumo: This work aimed to evaluate the effects of simulated glyphosate drift on leaf growth and micromorphology of Eucalyptus spp. clones, using subdoses. A factorial scheme consisting of three clones, Eucalyptus urophylla, E. grandis and the hybrid E. urophylla × E. grandis (E. urograndis) and five sub-rates (0; 43.2; 86.4; 172.8 and 345.6 g e.a. ha^−1 of glyphosate) were used in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The herbicide was applied on the plants so as not to reach the superior third, 23 days after seedling planting. At 7 and 15 days after application (DAA), the leaves collected from the first basal branch of the plants were processed according to the conventional methodology used for micromorphological studies. The effects of glyphosate drift were proportional to the rates tested, with E. urophylla being more tolerant to the herbicide than E. grandis and E. urograndis. Glyphosate symptoms were the same for the different clones tested, being characterized by wilting, chlorosis and leaf curling, and, at higher rates, by necrosis, foliar senescence and death of the eucalypt plants. Plants submitted to 172.8 and 345.6 g ha^−1 of glyphosate had severe injuries in the aerial part, affecting their development, resulting in reduced height, stem diameter and dry mass at 50 DAA. The micromorphological damages occurred prior to the appearance of visible symptoms, with erosion of the epicuticular waxes and fungal hypha infestation in plants exposed to glyphosate drift being observed in the three clones. No marked difference in leaf micromorphology was observed that could explain the differential tolerance among the three clones studied. The results show that further studies on wax and cuticle constitution of Eucalyptus spp. are needed for the elucidation of the mechanisms of differential tolerance of eucalypt species and clones to glyphosate.
id UFV_88d77ecbae4d264d4102b0c75ec11c7c
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/22180
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str 2145
spelling Santos, Leonardo David TuffiMeira, Renata Maria Strozi AlvesFerreira, Francisco AffonsoSant’Anna-Santos, Bruno FranciscoFerreira, Lino Roberto2018-10-08T01:19:20Z2018-10-08T01:19:20Z2007-0100988472https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.09.010http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/22180This work aimed to evaluate the effects of simulated glyphosate drift on leaf growth and micromorphology of Eucalyptus spp. clones, using subdoses. A factorial scheme consisting of three clones, Eucalyptus urophylla, E. grandis and the hybrid E. urophylla × E. grandis (E. urograndis) and five sub-rates (0; 43.2; 86.4; 172.8 and 345.6 g e.a. ha^−1 of glyphosate) were used in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The herbicide was applied on the plants so as not to reach the superior third, 23 days after seedling planting. At 7 and 15 days after application (DAA), the leaves collected from the first basal branch of the plants were processed according to the conventional methodology used for micromorphological studies. The effects of glyphosate drift were proportional to the rates tested, with E. urophylla being more tolerant to the herbicide than E. grandis and E. urograndis. Glyphosate symptoms were the same for the different clones tested, being characterized by wilting, chlorosis and leaf curling, and, at higher rates, by necrosis, foliar senescence and death of the eucalypt plants. Plants submitted to 172.8 and 345.6 g ha^−1 of glyphosate had severe injuries in the aerial part, affecting their development, resulting in reduced height, stem diameter and dry mass at 50 DAA. The micromorphological damages occurred prior to the appearance of visible symptoms, with erosion of the epicuticular waxes and fungal hypha infestation in plants exposed to glyphosate drift being observed in the three clones. No marked difference in leaf micromorphology was observed that could explain the differential tolerance among the three clones studied. The results show that further studies on wax and cuticle constitution of Eucalyptus spp. are needed for the elucidation of the mechanisms of differential tolerance of eucalypt species and clones to glyphosate.engEnvironmental and Experimental Botanyv. 59, n. 1, p. 11- 20, jan. 2007Elsevier B.V.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEucalyptus spp.Scanning electron microscopyHerbicideEpicuticular waxPhytotoxicityMorphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate driftinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINALartigo.pdfartigo.pdftexto completoapplication/pdf4859538https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/22180/1/artigo.pdfdde33378df7423684cf146b5192b1425MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/22180/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52123456789/221802018-10-07 22:25:45.951oai:locus.ufv.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452018-10-08T01:25:45LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift
title Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift
spellingShingle Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift
Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi
Eucalyptus spp.
Scanning electron microscopy
Herbicide
Epicuticular wax
Phytotoxicity
title_short Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift
title_full Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift
title_fullStr Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift
title_full_unstemmed Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift
title_sort Morphological responses of different eucalypt clones submitted to glyphosate drift
author Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi
author_facet Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi
Meira, Renata Maria Strozi Alves
Ferreira, Francisco Affonso
Sant’Anna-Santos, Bruno Francisco
Ferreira, Lino Roberto
author_role author
author2 Meira, Renata Maria Strozi Alves
Ferreira, Francisco Affonso
Sant’Anna-Santos, Bruno Francisco
Ferreira, Lino Roberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Leonardo David Tuffi
Meira, Renata Maria Strozi Alves
Ferreira, Francisco Affonso
Sant’Anna-Santos, Bruno Francisco
Ferreira, Lino Roberto
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Eucalyptus spp.
Scanning electron microscopy
Herbicide
Epicuticular wax
Phytotoxicity
topic Eucalyptus spp.
Scanning electron microscopy
Herbicide
Epicuticular wax
Phytotoxicity
description This work aimed to evaluate the effects of simulated glyphosate drift on leaf growth and micromorphology of Eucalyptus spp. clones, using subdoses. A factorial scheme consisting of three clones, Eucalyptus urophylla, E. grandis and the hybrid E. urophylla × E. grandis (E. urograndis) and five sub-rates (0; 43.2; 86.4; 172.8 and 345.6 g e.a. ha^−1 of glyphosate) were used in a randomized block design, with four repetitions. The herbicide was applied on the plants so as not to reach the superior third, 23 days after seedling planting. At 7 and 15 days after application (DAA), the leaves collected from the first basal branch of the plants were processed according to the conventional methodology used for micromorphological studies. The effects of glyphosate drift were proportional to the rates tested, with E. urophylla being more tolerant to the herbicide than E. grandis and E. urograndis. Glyphosate symptoms were the same for the different clones tested, being characterized by wilting, chlorosis and leaf curling, and, at higher rates, by necrosis, foliar senescence and death of the eucalypt plants. Plants submitted to 172.8 and 345.6 g ha^−1 of glyphosate had severe injuries in the aerial part, affecting their development, resulting in reduced height, stem diameter and dry mass at 50 DAA. The micromorphological damages occurred prior to the appearance of visible symptoms, with erosion of the epicuticular waxes and fungal hypha infestation in plants exposed to glyphosate drift being observed in the three clones. No marked difference in leaf micromorphology was observed that could explain the differential tolerance among the three clones studied. The results show that further studies on wax and cuticle constitution of Eucalyptus spp. are needed for the elucidation of the mechanisms of differential tolerance of eucalypt species and clones to glyphosate.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2007-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-10-08T01:19:20Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-10-08T01:19:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.09.010
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/22180
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 00988472
identifier_str_mv 00988472
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.09.010
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/22180
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.pt-BR.fl_str_mv v. 59, n. 1, p. 11- 20, jan. 2007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Environmental and Experimental Botany
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Environmental and Experimental Botany
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/22180/1/artigo.pdf
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/22180/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv dde33378df7423684cf146b5192b1425
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1801212997089099776