Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000400011 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16164 |
Resumo: | Forest plantation costs can be reduced by the income from annual crops that are intercropped with trees. An experiment was carried out over two years to assess the viability of agroforestry systems including sabiá (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia), gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) and maize (cultivar AG 1051). In 2010, the legumes were grown both as monocrops and intercropped (taungya system) with maize in randomized blocks with five replications. Three rows of maize were planted between two rows of each legume (at a spacing of 4.0 m x 4.0 m). In 2011, the legumes were cut down, and the young branches and leaves were added to the areas of intercropped cultivation (alley cropping system). Gliricidia had lower plant height than sabiá. Moreover, while not affecting for gliricidia, intercropping increased plant height for sabiá. Intercropping reduced green ear yield but not grain yield and reduced the cost of introducing reforestation. Intercropping using the alley system reduced the total number and mass of green ears, as well as grain yield, but did not influence the yield of marketable green ears. Finally, producing green ears was more profitable than producing grain and maize monocropping provided a higher net income than intercropping. |
id |
UFV_9060295b4df659682469f4b957d562b0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/16164 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV |
network_name_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository_id_str |
2145 |
spelling |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systemsMimosa caesalpiniifoliaGliricidia sepiumZea maysForest plantation costs can be reduced by the income from annual crops that are intercropped with trees. An experiment was carried out over two years to assess the viability of agroforestry systems including sabiá (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia), gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) and maize (cultivar AG 1051). In 2010, the legumes were grown both as monocrops and intercropped (taungya system) with maize in randomized blocks with five replications. Three rows of maize were planted between two rows of each legume (at a spacing of 4.0 m x 4.0 m). In 2011, the legumes were cut down, and the young branches and leaves were added to the areas of intercropped cultivation (alley cropping system). Gliricidia had lower plant height than sabiá. Moreover, while not affecting for gliricidia, intercropping increased plant height for sabiá. Intercropping reduced green ear yield but not grain yield and reduced the cost of introducing reforestation. Intercropping using the alley system reduced the total number and mass of green ears, as well as grain yield, but did not influence the yield of marketable green ears. Finally, producing green ears was more profitable than producing grain and maize monocropping provided a higher net income than intercropping.Os custos de plantios florestais podem ser reduzidos com a renda de culturas consorciadas com as espécies arbóreas. Um experimento foi realizado nos anos 2010 e 2011 para avaliar a viabilidade de dois sistemas agroflorestais envolvendo leguminosas (sabiá e gliricídia) e milho (cultivar AG 1051). Em 2010, as leguminosas foram cultivadas em monocultivo e em consorciação (sistema taungya) com o milho, em blocos ao acaso com cinco repetições. Três fileiras de milho foram plantadas entre duas fileiras das leguminosas (espaçamento 4,0 m x 4,0 m). Em 2011, as leguminosas foram cortadas a 0,5 m do nível do solo, e os ramos jovens e folhas foram incorporados nas áreas cultivadas em consórcio (sistema aléias). A consorciação aumenta a altura da planta (AP) na sabiá, mas não na gliricídia. A gliricídia tem menor AP do que a sabiá. A consorciação reduz o rendimento de espigas verdes, mas não o rendimento de grãos. A consorciação com milho reduz os custos de implantação do reflorestamento, especialmente com a venda de espigas verdes. Em aleias, a consorciação reduz o número e a massa totais de espigas verdes e o rendimento de grãos, mas não influencia o rendimento de espigas verdes comercializáveis. Produzir espigas verdes é mais vantajoso do que produzir grãos. O monocultivo do milho proporciona maior renda do que a consorciação.Revista Árvore2018-01-09T09:36:34Z2018-01-09T09:36:34Z2016-05-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepdfapplication/pdf1806-9088http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000400011http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16164engv. 40, n. 4, p. 679-688, Jul./Ago. 2016Oliveira, Vianney Reinaldo deSilva, Paulo Sérgio Lima ePaiva, Haroldo Nogueira dePontes, Frederico Silva ThéAntonio, Rafaela Priscilainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV2024-07-12T08:47:05Zoai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/16164Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452024-07-12T08:47:05LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems |
title |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems |
spellingShingle |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems Oliveira, Vianney Reinaldo de Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Gliricidia sepium Zea mays |
title_short |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems |
title_full |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems |
title_fullStr |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems |
title_sort |
Growth of arboreal leguminous plants and maize yield in agroforestry systems |
author |
Oliveira, Vianney Reinaldo de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Vianney Reinaldo de Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lima e Paiva, Haroldo Nogueira de Pontes, Frederico Silva Thé Antonio, Rafaela Priscila |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lima e Paiva, Haroldo Nogueira de Pontes, Frederico Silva Thé Antonio, Rafaela Priscila |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Vianney Reinaldo de Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lima e Paiva, Haroldo Nogueira de Pontes, Frederico Silva Thé Antonio, Rafaela Priscila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Gliricidia sepium Zea mays |
topic |
Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Gliricidia sepium Zea mays |
description |
Forest plantation costs can be reduced by the income from annual crops that are intercropped with trees. An experiment was carried out over two years to assess the viability of agroforestry systems including sabiá (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia), gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) and maize (cultivar AG 1051). In 2010, the legumes were grown both as monocrops and intercropped (taungya system) with maize in randomized blocks with five replications. Three rows of maize were planted between two rows of each legume (at a spacing of 4.0 m x 4.0 m). In 2011, the legumes were cut down, and the young branches and leaves were added to the areas of intercropped cultivation (alley cropping system). Gliricidia had lower plant height than sabiá. Moreover, while not affecting for gliricidia, intercropping increased plant height for sabiá. Intercropping reduced green ear yield but not grain yield and reduced the cost of introducing reforestation. Intercropping using the alley system reduced the total number and mass of green ears, as well as grain yield, but did not influence the yield of marketable green ears. Finally, producing green ears was more profitable than producing grain and maize monocropping provided a higher net income than intercropping. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-20 2018-01-09T09:36:34Z 2018-01-09T09:36:34Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
1806-9088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000400011 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16164 |
identifier_str_mv |
1806-9088 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622016000400011 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16164 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
v. 40, n. 4, p. 679-688, Jul./Ago. 2016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Árvore |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Árvore |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
collection |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fabiojreis@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1817560043248156672 |