Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Champagne, Catherine M., Bray, George A., Kurtz, April A., Tucker, Elizabeth W., Volaufová, Júlia, James P. Delany
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23225
Resumo: Underreporting of food intake has been commonly observed. We hypothesized that experience with recording dietary information might increase the accuracy of the records. To test this hypothesis, we compared energy intake and energy expenditure in dietitians—who are experienced in recording food intake—with those of non-dietitians, whose only exposure to training to record food was in the context of this trial. Subjects for this study were 10 female registered dietitians and 10 women of comparable age and weight who were not dietitians. This study compared the energy intake obtained from 7-day food records with energy expenditure measured over the corresponding 7-day period using doubly labeled water. Data were compared by an analysis of variance. All subjects were trained to provide a 7-day weighed food intake record. Energy expenditure was measured with doubly labeled water over the 7 days when the weighed food intake record was obtained. A total of 10 dietitians and a control of group of 10 women of similar age and weight were recruited for this study. Participants were told that the goal was to record food intake as accurately as possible, because it would be compared with the simultaneous measurement of energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled water. The energy expenditure of the dietitians and controls were not different (2,154±105 [mean±standard error of the mean] kcal/day for dietitians and 2,315±90 kcal/ day for controls). The dietitians underreported their energy intake obtained from the food records by an average of 223±116 kcal/day, which was not different from their energy expenditure. Participants in the control group, as hypothesized, significantly underreported their energy intake (429±142 kcal/day, P<.05).Dietitians estimated their energy intake more accurately than non-dietitians, suggesting that familiarity with and interest in keeping food records may lead to more reliable estimates of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102:1428-1432.
id UFV_c3175de224356b10b37cc34106af81c7
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/23225
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str 2145
spelling Monteiro, Josefina Bressan ResendeChampagne, Catherine M.Bray, George A.Kurtz, April A.Tucker, Elizabeth W.Volaufová, JúliaJames P. Delany2019-01-28T19:31:31Z2019-01-28T19:31:31Z2002-100002-8223https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23225Underreporting of food intake has been commonly observed. We hypothesized that experience with recording dietary information might increase the accuracy of the records. To test this hypothesis, we compared energy intake and energy expenditure in dietitians—who are experienced in recording food intake—with those of non-dietitians, whose only exposure to training to record food was in the context of this trial. Subjects for this study were 10 female registered dietitians and 10 women of comparable age and weight who were not dietitians. This study compared the energy intake obtained from 7-day food records with energy expenditure measured over the corresponding 7-day period using doubly labeled water. Data were compared by an analysis of variance. All subjects were trained to provide a 7-day weighed food intake record. Energy expenditure was measured with doubly labeled water over the 7 days when the weighed food intake record was obtained. A total of 10 dietitians and a control of group of 10 women of similar age and weight were recruited for this study. Participants were told that the goal was to record food intake as accurately as possible, because it would be compared with the simultaneous measurement of energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled water. The energy expenditure of the dietitians and controls were not different (2,154±105 [mean±standard error of the mean] kcal/day for dietitians and 2,315±90 kcal/ day for controls). The dietitians underreported their energy intake obtained from the food records by an average of 223±116 kcal/day, which was not different from their energy expenditure. Participants in the control group, as hypothesized, significantly underreported their energy intake (429±142 kcal/day, P<.05).Dietitians estimated their energy intake more accurately than non-dietitians, suggesting that familiarity with and interest in keeping food records may lead to more reliable estimates of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102:1428-1432.engJournal of the American Dietetic AssociationVolume 102, Issue 10, Pages 1428-1432, October 2002Energy expenditureEnergy intakeComparing Dietitians and Non-dietitiansEnergy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitiansinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINALartigo.pdfartigo.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf506564https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23225/1/artigo.pdfd156e96f13b8ef8d87a24f918cb43529MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23225/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52123456789/232252019-01-28 16:32:34.441oai:locus.ufv.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452019-01-28T19:32:34LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
title Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
spellingShingle Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende
Energy expenditure
Energy intake
Comparing Dietitians and Non-dietitians
title_short Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
title_full Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
title_fullStr Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
title_full_unstemmed Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
title_sort Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
author Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende
author_facet Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende
Champagne, Catherine M.
Bray, George A.
Kurtz, April A.
Tucker, Elizabeth W.
Volaufová, Júlia
James P. Delany
author_role author
author2 Champagne, Catherine M.
Bray, George A.
Kurtz, April A.
Tucker, Elizabeth W.
Volaufová, Júlia
James P. Delany
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende
Champagne, Catherine M.
Bray, George A.
Kurtz, April A.
Tucker, Elizabeth W.
Volaufová, Júlia
James P. Delany
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Energy expenditure
Energy intake
Comparing Dietitians and Non-dietitians
topic Energy expenditure
Energy intake
Comparing Dietitians and Non-dietitians
description Underreporting of food intake has been commonly observed. We hypothesized that experience with recording dietary information might increase the accuracy of the records. To test this hypothesis, we compared energy intake and energy expenditure in dietitians—who are experienced in recording food intake—with those of non-dietitians, whose only exposure to training to record food was in the context of this trial. Subjects for this study were 10 female registered dietitians and 10 women of comparable age and weight who were not dietitians. This study compared the energy intake obtained from 7-day food records with energy expenditure measured over the corresponding 7-day period using doubly labeled water. Data were compared by an analysis of variance. All subjects were trained to provide a 7-day weighed food intake record. Energy expenditure was measured with doubly labeled water over the 7 days when the weighed food intake record was obtained. A total of 10 dietitians and a control of group of 10 women of similar age and weight were recruited for this study. Participants were told that the goal was to record food intake as accurately as possible, because it would be compared with the simultaneous measurement of energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled water. The energy expenditure of the dietitians and controls were not different (2,154±105 [mean±standard error of the mean] kcal/day for dietitians and 2,315±90 kcal/ day for controls). The dietitians underreported their energy intake obtained from the food records by an average of 223±116 kcal/day, which was not different from their energy expenditure. Participants in the control group, as hypothesized, significantly underreported their energy intake (429±142 kcal/day, P<.05).Dietitians estimated their energy intake more accurately than non-dietitians, suggesting that familiarity with and interest in keeping food records may lead to more reliable estimates of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102:1428-1432.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2002-10
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-01-28T19:31:31Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-01-28T19:31:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23225
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0002-8223
identifier_str_mv 0002-8223
url https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Volume 102, Issue 10, Pages 1428-1432, October 2002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the American Dietetic Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the American Dietetic Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23225/1/artigo.pdf
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23225/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d156e96f13b8ef8d87a24f918cb43529
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1801213136581165056