Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23225 |
Resumo: | Underreporting of food intake has been commonly observed. We hypothesized that experience with recording dietary information might increase the accuracy of the records. To test this hypothesis, we compared energy intake and energy expenditure in dietitians—who are experienced in recording food intake—with those of non-dietitians, whose only exposure to training to record food was in the context of this trial. Subjects for this study were 10 female registered dietitians and 10 women of comparable age and weight who were not dietitians. This study compared the energy intake obtained from 7-day food records with energy expenditure measured over the corresponding 7-day period using doubly labeled water. Data were compared by an analysis of variance. All subjects were trained to provide a 7-day weighed food intake record. Energy expenditure was measured with doubly labeled water over the 7 days when the weighed food intake record was obtained. A total of 10 dietitians and a control of group of 10 women of similar age and weight were recruited for this study. Participants were told that the goal was to record food intake as accurately as possible, because it would be compared with the simultaneous measurement of energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled water. The energy expenditure of the dietitians and controls were not different (2,154±105 [mean±standard error of the mean] kcal/day for dietitians and 2,315±90 kcal/ day for controls). The dietitians underreported their energy intake obtained from the food records by an average of 223±116 kcal/day, which was not different from their energy expenditure. Participants in the control group, as hypothesized, significantly underreported their energy intake (429±142 kcal/day, P<.05).Dietitians estimated their energy intake more accurately than non-dietitians, suggesting that familiarity with and interest in keeping food records may lead to more reliable estimates of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102:1428-1432. |
id |
UFV_c3175de224356b10b37cc34106af81c7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/23225 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV |
network_name_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository_id_str |
2145 |
spelling |
Monteiro, Josefina Bressan ResendeChampagne, Catherine M.Bray, George A.Kurtz, April A.Tucker, Elizabeth W.Volaufová, JúliaJames P. Delany2019-01-28T19:31:31Z2019-01-28T19:31:31Z2002-100002-8223https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23225Underreporting of food intake has been commonly observed. We hypothesized that experience with recording dietary information might increase the accuracy of the records. To test this hypothesis, we compared energy intake and energy expenditure in dietitians—who are experienced in recording food intake—with those of non-dietitians, whose only exposure to training to record food was in the context of this trial. Subjects for this study were 10 female registered dietitians and 10 women of comparable age and weight who were not dietitians. This study compared the energy intake obtained from 7-day food records with energy expenditure measured over the corresponding 7-day period using doubly labeled water. Data were compared by an analysis of variance. All subjects were trained to provide a 7-day weighed food intake record. Energy expenditure was measured with doubly labeled water over the 7 days when the weighed food intake record was obtained. A total of 10 dietitians and a control of group of 10 women of similar age and weight were recruited for this study. Participants were told that the goal was to record food intake as accurately as possible, because it would be compared with the simultaneous measurement of energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled water. The energy expenditure of the dietitians and controls were not different (2,154±105 [mean±standard error of the mean] kcal/day for dietitians and 2,315±90 kcal/ day for controls). The dietitians underreported their energy intake obtained from the food records by an average of 223±116 kcal/day, which was not different from their energy expenditure. Participants in the control group, as hypothesized, significantly underreported their energy intake (429±142 kcal/day, P<.05).Dietitians estimated their energy intake more accurately than non-dietitians, suggesting that familiarity with and interest in keeping food records may lead to more reliable estimates of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102:1428-1432.engJournal of the American Dietetic AssociationVolume 102, Issue 10, Pages 1428-1432, October 2002Energy expenditureEnergy intakeComparing Dietitians and Non-dietitiansEnergy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitiansinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINALartigo.pdfartigo.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf506564https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23225/1/artigo.pdfd156e96f13b8ef8d87a24f918cb43529MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23225/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52123456789/232252019-01-28 16:32:34.441oai:locus.ufv.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452019-01-28T19:32:34LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians |
title |
Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians |
spellingShingle |
Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende Energy expenditure Energy intake Comparing Dietitians and Non-dietitians |
title_short |
Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians |
title_full |
Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians |
title_fullStr |
Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians |
title_full_unstemmed |
Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians |
title_sort |
Energy intake and energy expenditure: a controlled study comparing dietitians and non-dietitians |
author |
Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende |
author_facet |
Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende Champagne, Catherine M. Bray, George A. Kurtz, April A. Tucker, Elizabeth W. Volaufová, Júlia James P. Delany |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Champagne, Catherine M. Bray, George A. Kurtz, April A. Tucker, Elizabeth W. Volaufová, Júlia James P. Delany |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro, Josefina Bressan Resende Champagne, Catherine M. Bray, George A. Kurtz, April A. Tucker, Elizabeth W. Volaufová, Júlia James P. Delany |
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
Energy expenditure Energy intake Comparing Dietitians and Non-dietitians |
topic |
Energy expenditure Energy intake Comparing Dietitians and Non-dietitians |
description |
Underreporting of food intake has been commonly observed. We hypothesized that experience with recording dietary information might increase the accuracy of the records. To test this hypothesis, we compared energy intake and energy expenditure in dietitians—who are experienced in recording food intake—with those of non-dietitians, whose only exposure to training to record food was in the context of this trial. Subjects for this study were 10 female registered dietitians and 10 women of comparable age and weight who were not dietitians. This study compared the energy intake obtained from 7-day food records with energy expenditure measured over the corresponding 7-day period using doubly labeled water. Data were compared by an analysis of variance. All subjects were trained to provide a 7-day weighed food intake record. Energy expenditure was measured with doubly labeled water over the 7 days when the weighed food intake record was obtained. A total of 10 dietitians and a control of group of 10 women of similar age and weight were recruited for this study. Participants were told that the goal was to record food intake as accurately as possible, because it would be compared with the simultaneous measurement of energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled water. The energy expenditure of the dietitians and controls were not different (2,154±105 [mean±standard error of the mean] kcal/day for dietitians and 2,315±90 kcal/ day for controls). The dietitians underreported their energy intake obtained from the food records by an average of 223±116 kcal/day, which was not different from their energy expenditure. Participants in the control group, as hypothesized, significantly underreported their energy intake (429±142 kcal/day, P<.05).Dietitians estimated their energy intake more accurately than non-dietitians, suggesting that familiarity with and interest in keeping food records may lead to more reliable estimates of energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102:1428-1432. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2002-10 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-28T19:31:31Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-28T19:31:31Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23225 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0002-8223 |
identifier_str_mv |
0002-8223 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90316-0 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23225 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 102, Issue 10, Pages 1428-1432, October 2002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the American Dietetic Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the American Dietetic Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
collection |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23225/1/artigo.pdf https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23225/2/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d156e96f13b8ef8d87a24f918cb43529 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fabiojreis@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1801213136581165056 |