Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
Texto Completo: | http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/526 |
Resumo: | In considering the development of forest harvesting in the country, it is observed that the progress was very big. Since the 60's until the present day there were many changes occurred in this sector, with the operations evolved from a manual process for the semimechanized, became in recent decades a significant aspect in terms of mechanization. Thus, becomes of great importance research that comes to diagnosis the impact profile inserted in the process of technological innovation on forest harvesting. The objective of this work was to evaluate the environment impact of the technological progress on forest harvesting. It was used a knowing to evaluate the environment impact of technological innovation in farm and agriculture (AGRO- AMBITEC), developed by EMBRAPA. This methodology evaluate the environment development of a specific technology in relation to that previously established one. The AMBITEC system was directed to an assessment of environmental impacts from the technological advances in forest harvesting. It was evaluated the environmental impacts in the following subsystems: chainsaw + cable skidding (before the innovation) in relation chainsaw + Track Skidder (after innovation); chainsaw + Forwarder (before the innovation) in relation Feller Buncher + Clambunk Skidder (after innovation); chainsaw + Forwarder (before the innovation) in relation Harvester + Forwarder (after innovation) and chainsaw + manual rolling (before the innovation) in relation chainsaw + yarding (after innovation). It were elaborate nine weighting matrices, being three related to the physical aspect (indicators: air, soil and water), two related to biotic aspect (indicators: flora and fauna) and four to the antropic aspect (indicators: landscaping, management, health and employment). This matrices were met by a training technical in forest harvesting, being one with technical formation in environment, one wich postgraduate studies in environmental management and one (1) with training in Forest Engineering, with graduate studies in forest science. Each representative completed nine matrices for each of the processes of innovation assessed (Table 1). The matrices was considered in relation to the scale of occurrence and factor of importance. The coefficient of environmental impact resulted from the product of the weighting factors for the coefficient of alteration (Table 2). The weighting factors was restricted to a scale of -15 to +15, capturing the positive and negative changes offered by technological diversification in sub evaluated. The indicators were also considered for determining the rate of overall impact. The average balance of the environmental impact of the change when the subsystem chainsaw cut + Forwarder to Feller Buncher + Clambunk Skidder, was negative for 66.67% of the indicators analyzed. For the subsystem chainsaw cut + manual rolling in relation chainsaw cut + yarding, the average balance of the environmental impact resulting from the process of innovation, was positive for 55.55% of the indicators. The replacement of cable skidding to Track Skidder in the drag provided, on average, environmental improvements in relation to 77.78% of the indicators. The change of forwarding to drag (replacing the Forwarder by Clambunk Skidder) provided significant damage on some components of the indicator flora (shrubs and planted vegetation). The index of overall impact, although not very expressive, was positive for the four processes of innovation in the study, thus indicating that the adoption of technological progress has proportionate improvements in the ambient context. |
id |
UFV_ea51e9369f03b5cbd44e906b2c5e35d8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/526 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV |
network_name_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository_id_str |
2145 |
spelling |
Freitas, Luís Carlos dehttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4761195P3Silva, Eliashttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4798029H5Silva, Márcio Lopes dahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784225D6Machado, Carlos Cardosohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4787052D7Leite, ângelo Márcio Pintohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784862D2Fernandes, Haroldo Carloshttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4761460E62015-03-26T12:26:59Z2009-06-162015-03-26T12:26:59Z2008-12-18FREITAS, Luís Carlos de. Evaluation of environment impact of the technological innovation on forest harvesting. 2008. 130 f. Tese (Doutorado em Manejo Florestal; Meio Ambiente e Conservação da Natureza; Silvicultura; Tecnologia e Utilização de) - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 2008.http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/526In considering the development of forest harvesting in the country, it is observed that the progress was very big. Since the 60's until the present day there were many changes occurred in this sector, with the operations evolved from a manual process for the semimechanized, became in recent decades a significant aspect in terms of mechanization. Thus, becomes of great importance research that comes to diagnosis the impact profile inserted in the process of technological innovation on forest harvesting. The objective of this work was to evaluate the environment impact of the technological progress on forest harvesting. It was used a knowing to evaluate the environment impact of technological innovation in farm and agriculture (AGRO- AMBITEC), developed by EMBRAPA. This methodology evaluate the environment development of a specific technology in relation to that previously established one. The AMBITEC system was directed to an assessment of environmental impacts from the technological advances in forest harvesting. It was evaluated the environmental impacts in the following subsystems: chainsaw + cable skidding (before the innovation) in relation chainsaw + Track Skidder (after innovation); chainsaw + Forwarder (before the innovation) in relation Feller Buncher + Clambunk Skidder (after innovation); chainsaw + Forwarder (before the innovation) in relation Harvester + Forwarder (after innovation) and chainsaw + manual rolling (before the innovation) in relation chainsaw + yarding (after innovation). It were elaborate nine weighting matrices, being three related to the physical aspect (indicators: air, soil and water), two related to biotic aspect (indicators: flora and fauna) and four to the antropic aspect (indicators: landscaping, management, health and employment). This matrices were met by a training technical in forest harvesting, being one with technical formation in environment, one wich postgraduate studies in environmental management and one (1) with training in Forest Engineering, with graduate studies in forest science. Each representative completed nine matrices for each of the processes of innovation assessed (Table 1). The matrices was considered in relation to the scale of occurrence and factor of importance. The coefficient of environmental impact resulted from the product of the weighting factors for the coefficient of alteration (Table 2). The weighting factors was restricted to a scale of -15 to +15, capturing the positive and negative changes offered by technological diversification in sub evaluated. The indicators were also considered for determining the rate of overall impact. The average balance of the environmental impact of the change when the subsystem chainsaw cut + Forwarder to Feller Buncher + Clambunk Skidder, was negative for 66.67% of the indicators analyzed. For the subsystem chainsaw cut + manual rolling in relation chainsaw cut + yarding, the average balance of the environmental impact resulting from the process of innovation, was positive for 55.55% of the indicators. The replacement of cable skidding to Track Skidder in the drag provided, on average, environmental improvements in relation to 77.78% of the indicators. The change of forwarding to drag (replacing the Forwarder by Clambunk Skidder) provided significant damage on some components of the indicator flora (shrubs and planted vegetation). The index of overall impact, although not very expressive, was positive for the four processes of innovation in the study, thus indicating that the adoption of technological progress has proportionate improvements in the ambient context.Ao analisar o desenvolvimento da colheita florestal no país, observa-se que o progresso foi muito grande. Da década de 60 até os dias atuais muitas mudanças ocorreram no setor, com as operações evoluindo de um processo manual para o semimecanizado, adquirindo nas últimas décadas um aspecto expressivo em termos de mecanização. Assim, torna-se de grande importância um estudo que venha diagnosticar o perfil impactante inserido no processo de inovação tecnológica da colheita florestal. O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar os impactos ambientais decorrentes do progresso tecnológico nesta atividade. Trabalhou-se com uma metodologia consolidada para avaliação de impacto ambiental da inovação tecnológica na agropecuária (AMBITEC-AGRO), desenvolvido pela Embrapa Meio-Ambiente, que avalia o desempenho ambiental de uma dada tecnologia ou metodologia em relação àquela previamente estabelecida. O sistema AMBITEC foi direcionado para uma avaliação de impactos ambientais oriundos dos avanços tecnológicos na colheita florestal. Avaliou-se portanto os impactos ambientais nos seguintes subsistemas de colheita: Motosserra + Guincho arrastador (antes da inovação) em relação Motosserra + Track Skidder (após inovação); Motosserra + Forwarder (antes da inovação) em relação Feller Buncher + Clambunk Skidder (após inovação); Motosserra + Forwarder (antes da inovação) em relação Harvester + Forwarder (após inovação) e Motosserra + Tombo Manual (antes da inovação) em relação Motosserra + Cabo Aéreo (após inovação). Foram elaboradas nove matrizes de ponderação, sendo três relacionadas ao aspecto físico (indicadores: atmosfera, solo e água); duas ao aspecto biótico (indicadores: flora e fauna) e quatro ao aspecto antrópico (indicadores: paisagismo, gestão, saúde e emprego). Estas foram preenchidas por técnicos da área florestal (3), sendo 1 (um) com formação técnica em meio ambiente; 1 (um) com especialização, a nível de pós- graduação, em gestão ambiental e 1 (um) com formação em engenharia florestal, com pós-graduação em ciência florestal. Cada representante preencheu nove matrizes, para cada um dos processos de inovação avaliado (Quadro 1). As matrizes foram ponderadas em relação à escala de ocorrência e fator de importância. O coeficiente de impacto ambiental resultou do produto dos fatores de ponderação pelo coeficiente de alteração (Quadro 2). Este ficou restrito a uma escala de -15 a +15, captando assim as alterações positivas e negativas proporcionadas pela diversificação tecnológica nos subsistemas avaliados. Os indicadores foram também ponderados em relação ao fator de importância para determinação do índice geral de impacto. O saldo médio de impacto ambiental, quando da mudança do subsistema Motosserra + Forwarder para Feller Buncher + Clambunk Skidder, mostrou-se negativo para 66,67% dos indicadores analisados. No caso do subsistema Motosserra + Tombo manual em relação Motosserra + Cabo Aéreo, o saldo médio de impacto ambiental, resultante do processo de inovação, mostrou-se positivo para 55,55% dos indicadores. A substituição do Guincho Arrastador pelo Track Skidder no processo de arraste proporcionou, em termos médios, melhorias ambientais em relação a 77,78% dos indicadores. A mudança do baldeio para o arraste (substituição do Forwarder pelo Clambunk Skidder), proporcionou danos expressivos em relação a alguns componentes do indicador flora (vegetação de sub-bosque e vegetação plantada). O índice geral de impacto, embora não muito expressivo, mostrou-se positivo para os quatro processos de inovação em estudo, indicando portanto, que a adoção do progresso tecnológico proporcionou melhorias no contexto ambiental.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicoapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de ViçosaDoutorado em Ciência FlorestalUFVBRManejo Florestal; Meio Ambiente e Conservação da Natureza; Silvicultura; Tecnologia e Utilização deColheita florestalInovação tecnológicaImpactos ambientaisForest harvestingTechnological innovationEnvironmental impactCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL::MANEJO FLORESTALAvaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestalEvaluation of environment impact of the technological innovation on forest harvestinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINALtexto completo.pdfapplication/pdf1257994https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/526/1/texto%20completo.pdf291bda07092af92be9dadfa581f82efeMD51TEXTtexto completo.pdf.txttexto completo.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain282110https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/526/2/texto%20completo.pdf.txteb1d6da2d716b745345d8b8a32ab046bMD52THUMBNAILtexto completo.pdf.jpgtexto completo.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg3522https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/526/3/texto%20completo.pdf.jpg9575cc07b907fbe0cb5b1a660cd61356MD53123456789/5262016-04-06 23:05:25.312oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/526Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452016-04-07T02:05:25LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of environment impact of the technological innovation on forest harvesting |
title |
Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal Freitas, Luís Carlos de Colheita florestal Inovação tecnológica Impactos ambientais Forest harvesting Technological innovation Environmental impact CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL::MANEJO FLORESTAL |
title_short |
Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal |
title_full |
Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal |
title_sort |
Avaliação de impactos ambientais da inovação tecnológica na colheita florestal |
author |
Freitas, Luís Carlos de |
author_facet |
Freitas, Luís Carlos de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4761195P3 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Freitas, Luís Carlos de |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Elias |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4798029H5 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co2.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Márcio Lopes da |
dc.contributor.advisor-co2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784225D6 |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Machado, Carlos Cardoso |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4787052D7 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Leite, ângelo Márcio Pinto |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784862D2 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Haroldo Carlos |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4761460E6 |
contributor_str_mv |
Silva, Elias Silva, Márcio Lopes da Machado, Carlos Cardoso Leite, ângelo Márcio Pinto Fernandes, Haroldo Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Colheita florestal Inovação tecnológica Impactos ambientais |
topic |
Colheita florestal Inovação tecnológica Impactos ambientais Forest harvesting Technological innovation Environmental impact CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL::MANEJO FLORESTAL |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Forest harvesting Technological innovation Environmental impact |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL::MANEJO FLORESTAL |
description |
In considering the development of forest harvesting in the country, it is observed that the progress was very big. Since the 60's until the present day there were many changes occurred in this sector, with the operations evolved from a manual process for the semimechanized, became in recent decades a significant aspect in terms of mechanization. Thus, becomes of great importance research that comes to diagnosis the impact profile inserted in the process of technological innovation on forest harvesting. The objective of this work was to evaluate the environment impact of the technological progress on forest harvesting. It was used a knowing to evaluate the environment impact of technological innovation in farm and agriculture (AGRO- AMBITEC), developed by EMBRAPA. This methodology evaluate the environment development of a specific technology in relation to that previously established one. The AMBITEC system was directed to an assessment of environmental impacts from the technological advances in forest harvesting. It was evaluated the environmental impacts in the following subsystems: chainsaw + cable skidding (before the innovation) in relation chainsaw + Track Skidder (after innovation); chainsaw + Forwarder (before the innovation) in relation Feller Buncher + Clambunk Skidder (after innovation); chainsaw + Forwarder (before the innovation) in relation Harvester + Forwarder (after innovation) and chainsaw + manual rolling (before the innovation) in relation chainsaw + yarding (after innovation). It were elaborate nine weighting matrices, being three related to the physical aspect (indicators: air, soil and water), two related to biotic aspect (indicators: flora and fauna) and four to the antropic aspect (indicators: landscaping, management, health and employment). This matrices were met by a training technical in forest harvesting, being one with technical formation in environment, one wich postgraduate studies in environmental management and one (1) with training in Forest Engineering, with graduate studies in forest science. Each representative completed nine matrices for each of the processes of innovation assessed (Table 1). The matrices was considered in relation to the scale of occurrence and factor of importance. The coefficient of environmental impact resulted from the product of the weighting factors for the coefficient of alteration (Table 2). The weighting factors was restricted to a scale of -15 to +15, capturing the positive and negative changes offered by technological diversification in sub evaluated. The indicators were also considered for determining the rate of overall impact. The average balance of the environmental impact of the change when the subsystem chainsaw cut + Forwarder to Feller Buncher + Clambunk Skidder, was negative for 66.67% of the indicators analyzed. For the subsystem chainsaw cut + manual rolling in relation chainsaw cut + yarding, the average balance of the environmental impact resulting from the process of innovation, was positive for 55.55% of the indicators. The replacement of cable skidding to Track Skidder in the drag provided, on average, environmental improvements in relation to 77.78% of the indicators. The change of forwarding to drag (replacing the Forwarder by Clambunk Skidder) provided significant damage on some components of the indicator flora (shrubs and planted vegetation). The index of overall impact, although not very expressive, was positive for the four processes of innovation in the study, thus indicating that the adoption of technological progress has proportionate improvements in the ambient context. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2008-12-18 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2009-06-16 2015-03-26T12:26:59Z |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2015-03-26T12:26:59Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
FREITAS, Luís Carlos de. Evaluation of environment impact of the technological innovation on forest harvesting. 2008. 130 f. Tese (Doutorado em Manejo Florestal; Meio Ambiente e Conservação da Natureza; Silvicultura; Tecnologia e Utilização de) - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 2008. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/526 |
identifier_str_mv |
FREITAS, Luís Carlos de. Evaluation of environment impact of the technological innovation on forest harvesting. 2008. 130 f. Tese (Doutorado em Manejo Florestal; Meio Ambiente e Conservação da Natureza; Silvicultura; Tecnologia e Utilização de) - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 2008. |
url |
http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/526 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Doutorado em Ciência Florestal |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFV |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Manejo Florestal; Meio Ambiente e Conservação da Natureza; Silvicultura; Tecnologia e Utilização de |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
collection |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/526/1/texto%20completo.pdf https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/526/2/texto%20completo.pdf.txt https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/526/3/texto%20completo.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
291bda07092af92be9dadfa581f82efe eb1d6da2d716b745345d8b8a32ab046b 9575cc07b907fbe0cb5b1a660cd61356 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fabiojreis@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1801213111975280640 |