“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Linhas Críticas (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/3920 |
Resumo: | This paper is aimed at revisiting Aristotle, Kant and Piaget, in order to identify in such authors contributions to bring to the floor a problematic which is crucial to the sphere of moral education, namely, “becoming the master of yourself”. Despite the temporal distance and theoretical differences among those three authors, we consider that their approaches converge to defend the need to develop in individuals the ability to master themselves. Such mastering allows the subject to contest the immediacy of his wishes and is a condition to reach a satisfactory level of coherence between moral judgment and action. Ultimately, when related to the field of moral education, this problematic points to the need to educate subjects, so as to create the conditions for them to regulate themselves morally. |
id |
UNB - 28_c5eec31610cb4f6798b5e27524bee74a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3920 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB - 28 |
network_name_str |
Linhas Críticas (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge“Convertirse en maestro de uno mismo”: sobre la actualidad ético-educativa de un desafío clásico“Tornar-se mestre de si”: sobre a atualidade ético-educativa de um desafio clássicoDomínio de siCaráterDescentraçãoVontadeAutorregulaçãoDominio de uno mismoCarácterDescentraciónVoluntadAutorregulaciónMastering oneselfCharacterDecentralizationWillSelf-regulationThis paper is aimed at revisiting Aristotle, Kant and Piaget, in order to identify in such authors contributions to bring to the floor a problematic which is crucial to the sphere of moral education, namely, “becoming the master of yourself”. Despite the temporal distance and theoretical differences among those three authors, we consider that their approaches converge to defend the need to develop in individuals the ability to master themselves. Such mastering allows the subject to contest the immediacy of his wishes and is a condition to reach a satisfactory level of coherence between moral judgment and action. Ultimately, when related to the field of moral education, this problematic points to the need to educate subjects, so as to create the conditions for them to regulate themselves morally.Este texto se propone visitar nuevamente a Aristóteles, Kant y Piaget con el objetivo de identificar, en estos autores, contribuciones para convertir en tema una problemática central en la esfera de la educación moral, a saber, el “convertirse en maestro de uno mismo”. A pesar de la distancia de tiempo y de las diferencias teóricas que existen entre los tres autores, se defiende la posición de que sus abordajes afluyen en la defensa de la necesidad del desarrollo, en el individuo y de la capacidad del dominio de uno mismo. Tal dominio posibilita al sujeto hacer frente al inmediatismo de los anhelos y se constituye como condición para alcanzar un nivel satisfactorio de coherencia entre el juez moral y la acción. En última instancia, cuando es vinculada al campo de formación moral, esa problemática sugiere la necesidad de dar educación a los sujetos como manera de crear condiciones para que se autorregulen moralmente.O presente texto propõe-se a revisitar Aristóteles, Kant e Piaget com o propósito de identificar, em tais autores, contribuições para tematizar uma problemática central à esfera da educação moral, a saber, o “tornar-se mestre de si”. Apesar da distância temporal e das diferenças teóricas existentes entre os três autores, defende-se a posição de que as suas abordagens convergem na defesa da necessidade do desenvolvimento, no indivíduo, da capacidade de domínio de si. Tal domínio possibilita ao sujeito fazer frente à imediatez dos desejos e constitui-se como condição para alcançar um nível satisfatório de coerência entre o juízo moral e a ação. Em última instância, quando vinculada ao campo da formação moral, essa problemática indica a necessidade de educar os sujeitos de modo a criar condições para se autorregularem moralmente.Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília2012-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/392010.26512/lc.v18i36.3920Linhas Críticas; Vol. 18 No. 36 (2012); 265-282Linhas Críticas; Vol. 18 Núm. 36 (2012); 265-282Linhas Críticas; v. 18 n. 36 (2012); 265-2821981-04311516-489610.26512/lc.v18i36reponame:Linhas Críticas (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UnBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/3920/3593Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCenci, Angelo Vitório2022-08-08T20:37:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3920Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/PUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/oairvlinhas@unb.br||1981-04311516-4896opendoar:2022-08-08T20:37:31Linhas Críticas (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge “Convertirse en maestro de uno mismo”: sobre la actualidad ético-educativa de un desafío clásico “Tornar-se mestre de si”: sobre a atualidade ético-educativa de um desafio clássico |
title |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge |
spellingShingle |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge Cenci, Angelo Vitório Domínio de si Caráter Descentração Vontade Autorregulação Dominio de uno mismo Carácter Descentración Voluntad Autorregulación Mastering oneself Character Decentralization Will Self-regulation |
title_short |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge |
title_full |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge |
title_fullStr |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge |
title_sort |
“Becoming the master of yourself”: on the current ethical-educational relevance of a classical challenge |
author |
Cenci, Angelo Vitório |
author_facet |
Cenci, Angelo Vitório |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cenci, Angelo Vitório |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Domínio de si Caráter Descentração Vontade Autorregulação Dominio de uno mismo Carácter Descentración Voluntad Autorregulación Mastering oneself Character Decentralization Will Self-regulation |
topic |
Domínio de si Caráter Descentração Vontade Autorregulação Dominio de uno mismo Carácter Descentración Voluntad Autorregulación Mastering oneself Character Decentralization Will Self-regulation |
description |
This paper is aimed at revisiting Aristotle, Kant and Piaget, in order to identify in such authors contributions to bring to the floor a problematic which is crucial to the sphere of moral education, namely, “becoming the master of yourself”. Despite the temporal distance and theoretical differences among those three authors, we consider that their approaches converge to defend the need to develop in individuals the ability to master themselves. Such mastering allows the subject to contest the immediacy of his wishes and is a condition to reach a satisfactory level of coherence between moral judgment and action. Ultimately, when related to the field of moral education, this problematic points to the need to educate subjects, so as to create the conditions for them to regulate themselves morally. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/3920 10.26512/lc.v18i36.3920 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/3920 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26512/lc.v18i36.3920 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/linhascriticas/article/view/3920/3593 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Educação - Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Linhas Críticas; Vol. 18 No. 36 (2012); 265-282 Linhas Críticas; Vol. 18 Núm. 36 (2012); 265-282 Linhas Críticas; v. 18 n. 36 (2012); 265-282 1981-0431 1516-4896 10.26512/lc.v18i36 reponame:Linhas Críticas (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UnB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UnB |
institution |
UnB |
reponame_str |
Linhas Críticas (Online) |
collection |
Linhas Críticas (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Linhas Críticas (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rvlinhas@unb.br|| |
_version_ |
1797053651101941760 |