Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
| Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8695 |
Resumo: | One of the debated topics about Plato’s Sophist is the distinction between original and image, more precisely, thedifference among the original, the true and the false image. It’sonly to justify this classification that the philosopher addressesto the demonstration of not”‘being and presents, right from thebeginning of the Dialogue, the dualism ‘reality”‘appearance’. Theaim of the present paper is creating a relationship between theconcepts of not”‘being and appearance, as they are presentedin the Sophist, to legitimize the existence of beings that are, although they are not real nor true, the phantasmata. This sort of beings is different from the other kind of image, because theyare essentially misleading. Keywords: Imagine (εἴδωλον), apparent image (φάντασμα), untruth, betrayal. |
| id |
UNB-18_2c8dc90ac68dfcb00315d8c5f2c51035 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8695 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
| network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platoneimmagine (εἴδωλον)immagine apparente (φάντασμα)falsità inganno - Imagine (εἴδωλον)apparent image (φάντασμα)untruthbetrayalOne of the debated topics about Plato’s Sophist is the distinction between original and image, more precisely, thedifference among the original, the true and the false image. It’sonly to justify this classification that the philosopher addressesto the demonstration of not”‘being and presents, right from thebeginning of the Dialogue, the dualism ‘reality”‘appearance’. Theaim of the present paper is creating a relationship between theconcepts of not”‘being and appearance, as they are presentedin the Sophist, to legitimize the existence of beings that are, although they are not real nor true, the phantasmata. This sort of beings is different from the other kind of image, because theyare essentially misleading. Keywords: Imagine (εἴδωλον), apparent image (φάντασμα), untruth, betrayal.Una delle questioni problematiche attorno alle quali ruota il dialogo Sofista di Platone è la distinzione fra originale e immagine, più precisamente, la distinzione fra originale, immagini vere e immagini false. È per giustificare questa classificazione che il filosofo si impegna nella dimostrazione del non”‘essere e gioca, sin dalle prime battute del dialogo, con il dualismo realtà ”‘apparenza. Scopo del presente articolo è di intrecciare le nozioni di non”‘essere e apparenza, tali quali sono definite nel Sofista, per giustificare l’esistenza di enti che sono, pur non essendo reali né veri, i phantasmata, i quali si distinguono da altre forme di immagine per il fatto di essere, per natura, ingannevoli. Parole chiave: immagine (εἴδωλον), immagine apparente(φάντασμα), falsità , inganno.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2016-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/869510.14195/1984-249X_18_3Revista Archai; No. 18 (2016): Revista Archai nº18 (setembro, 2016); 113Archai Journal; n. 18 (2016): Revista Archai nº18 (setembro, 2016); 1131984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_18reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8695/7375Botter, Barbarainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-08T14:00:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8695Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2018-06-08T14:00:40Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone |
| title |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone |
| spellingShingle |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone Botter, Barbara immagine (εἴδωλον) immagine apparente (φάντασμα) falsità inganno - Imagine (εἴδωλον) apparent image (φάντασμα) untruth betrayal |
| title_short |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone |
| title_full |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone |
| title_fullStr |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone |
| title_sort |
Enti Inesistenti:: phantasmata in Platone |
| author |
Botter, Barbara |
| author_facet |
Botter, Barbara |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Botter, Barbara |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
immagine (εἴδωλον) immagine apparente (φάντασμα) falsità inganno - Imagine (εἴδωλον) apparent image (φάντασμα) untruth betrayal |
| topic |
immagine (εἴδωλον) immagine apparente (φάντασμα) falsità inganno - Imagine (εἴδωλον) apparent image (φάντασμα) untruth betrayal |
| description |
One of the debated topics about Plato’s Sophist is the distinction between original and image, more precisely, thedifference among the original, the true and the false image. It’sonly to justify this classification that the philosopher addressesto the demonstration of not”‘being and presents, right from thebeginning of the Dialogue, the dualism ‘reality”‘appearance’. Theaim of the present paper is creating a relationship between theconcepts of not”‘being and appearance, as they are presentedin the Sophist, to legitimize the existence of beings that are, although they are not real nor true, the phantasmata. This sort of beings is different from the other kind of image, because theyare essentially misleading. Keywords: Imagine (εἴδωλον), apparent image (φάντασμα), untruth, betrayal. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-25 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles Artigos |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8695 10.14195/1984-249X_18_3 |
| url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8695 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.14195/1984-249X_18_3 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8695/7375 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 18 (2016): Revista Archai nº18 (setembro, 2016); 113 Archai Journal; n. 18 (2016): Revista Archai nº18 (setembro, 2016); 113 1984-249X 2179-4960 10.14195/1984-249X_18 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
| instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| instacron_str |
UNB |
| institution |
UNB |
| reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
| collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
| _version_ |
1798319944877735936 |